- Report Post
- Posted: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 00:02:03 +0000
As for those people, I'm not sure. I think there was a lot of psychology involved with it, and they were pushed into extenuating circumstances (ie, prosecute Jews and other minorities or be jailed/die), but Hitler was the one who perpetuated it all and had more of a choice (or, well, a better set of options). So I think that's where the difference might be.
Jail isn't a threat if there's no jailers; Hitler couldn't have perpetuated it all alone.
That's very true. But he could still kill them. biggrin
A single person can only kill so many against their will.