nouveau sereph
[...]control them so they don't proliferate needlessly - there's no reason why a private citizen should be allowed to own an extensive and dangerous firearm collection without jumping through many hoops or having legitimate reasons (farming, sport, etc), for example, and the structure of our gun control laws makes sure that doesn't happen.
I really do wish that this worked here, then maybe it would be worth considering, but it's been borne out repeatedly that when they try increasing the controls here it doesn't actually do anything to the difficulty of criminals to get guns.
The other thing is that "legitimate reason" is really too subjective to government application. In may-issue states for carry permits (like CA), just as a running example (it's not a perfect comparison), it ends up being a de-facto no. The folks in law enforcement are often against any citizens owning or carrying guns, because they (illogically, as above) think that they'll eventually be facing down those guns. The net result is that the only people that can get permits to carry are ex/current law enforcement and personal/political friends of the police. They simply dismiss everyone else as "not really needing it." So now you're at the whim of the sheriff for your local area, rather than the legitimacy of your need/request.
People that have extensive firearm collections are in fact the exact opposite of dangerous. The guy with thousands and thousands of dollars to blow on a hobby? He's not robbing people. It's an easy knee-jerk to think more guns = more danger, but that's not really the case. They don't check the home of guy that knocked off the gas station and find a cache of legally acquired guns.
Same thing with the laws here surrounding "assault riles" (which is to say scary black rifles). If it's got black plastic instead of wood, suddenly the same functional rifle needs extra background checks and you need to be 21 (vs only 18 if it's wood). Something like % 1 of crimes are committed with rifles, it's almost always handguns. So what's the real goal of regulating black plastic on rifles? What criminals is that law that effective against?
Lanackse-Kanvae
I'd probably prefer to own a crossbow or composite bow since the recoil from a rifle could probably do some damage to my shoulder.
Depends on what you get. A heavier gun with a lower caliber will have less felt recoil. Like a .22LR in a big long bull barrel you can barely even feel. Something like .223 in a heavier rifle isn't bad either, probably about on par with the recoil of a crossbow.
Lanackse-Kanvae
Besides which, guns require some serious care and often special ammo to avoid jamming. I live in an area where 80% humidity is considered low (yay for living on a peninsula) and that may not do a gun much favours. I know that chrome suffers a lot in high humidity.
Well, cleaning is really all you need to avoid jamming in a properly built gun. The humidity sucks, I have a similar issue here, you just have to keep it wiped with oil when you put it away. Chrome (usually hard-chrome, which isn't shiny, like on tools) is actually one of the best anti-corrosion finishes. There's lots of finishes out there though to fight corrosion anyway though.