Rotsab M. Hyolf
I'm very late with this, but I'm curious to hear your idea behind the big bang! Doubly so, with the mention of time. I had been told that 'time' actually didn't exist in physics because it was a unit of measurement/perception, and not an actual existing force on its own (the way gravity, sound, so on are). Hence why time 'ceases' to move in the center of a black hole -- there is no way to percieve it. It also throws a kink in the whole going back in time thing, haha.
But I mean, that's probably just one theory, and I'm sure people thought that light/sound/gravity were things that didn't really exist unto themselves as well. That something can affect time (gravity, I think it is?) certainly points to its objective existence.
Time absolutely exists in physics... I don't know who told you that, but that person deserves a swift kick in the a**. The time travel thing gets the kink thrown in it because we really don't get what time is -- at least not in the same sense that we get space. When people ask me, "How do you time travel?" I respond, "Well, when you can tell me what time is, then I'll try to travel through it."
Now, the big bang thing is extremely hand wavy, and by hand wavy I mean problematic and bogus for several reasons. However, those reasons can somewhat be ironed out. Nonetheless, it leads to an interesting exercise in quantum mechanics.
People get their panties in a wad when it comes to extra dimensions of space. Theorists love them because they create magic. For example: why are the weak nuclear force and gravity so ******** weak compared to the strong and electromagnetic forces? Well, gee Pa, it's because the weak and gravitational forces extend into multiple dimensions of space. My statement here is why don't we consider multiple dimensions of time?
There really is no reason not to -- aside of course from the obvious fact that we'd have no concrete way to observe it. This is the first point that makes the whole construct somewhat bogus. If you can't observe it, then what could does it do? However, it leads to some cool s**t.
Consider a 1D box in which a there is an equal probability for a particle to exist at a point x. I liken this to the result of a Higgs field coupling to generate an observable mass. There isn't really justification to prefer one region of space over another. Thus, in a finite space, I declare the wavefunction to just be a constant value.
Y = a*exp(-iwt) - in that case.
Now, if I magic in Schrodinger's Equation when there is no potential structure (aka V=0):
w*a*exp(-iwt) = 0 --> which means w = 0 in this system. No dynamics, no energy. BOREDOM.
******** THAT!
Let's make things complicated
I'm going to introduce more dimensions in time and space. The wavefunction will not be constrained to be constant in those extra space dimensions, just for added coolness.
Y = a*f(X)*exp(-i<w|I|t>
wink
So I've created a bunch of s**t in that propagator too. <w| is the frequency state, I is the Trigger interaction tensor -- which I introduce because I believe the fundamental forces couple things differently, and |t> is our nice time state. In reality, I should put a summation symbol there, but that just complicates things, and I'm going to write the ******** thing out in matrix form anyway.
Now, we need to modify Schrodinger's equation to deal with this crap.
id/dt Y = -h^2/2m * Del^2(Y) --> iSum(d/dt) Y = -1/2m a*exp(-i<w|I|t>
wink *Del^2(f(X))
This leads to a lot of bullshit that I'd rather not write out.
However, let's switch gears and consider a two-dimension time case in which the coupling tensor was maximal (the condition I feel is true for weak force operations) Let's also throw out extra dimensions of space to simplify my junk.
Y = a*exp(-i (w1 w2)(0 -1 / 1 0) (t1 t2)) --> a*exp(-i(w2*t1-w1*t2))
SEQ--> w2 - w1 = 0 or w2=w1 with no bounds placed on the energy of the system. It's not forced to go to zero, so fun s**t can commence.
But there are more issues with this. Such as, since I'd like to remove mass entirely, I should be trying this with Klein-Gordon and not SEQ. However, in that case, this same fun no longer works. There is also the issue that I am not addressing creation operators directly, and the fact that there really isn't a quantum scale environment in which the wavefunction is truly flat.
It's just a hand wavy fun thing to look at and poke about when I'm bored. However, I named this unbound energy scaling the SHKK Generator as if it works out, it does lead to a loop where multiple dimensions of time+primordial mass? --> energy --> mass we know today? --> space --> space time coupling.
