Yes, I suppose love is love. Besides if they wanted to and if they were concerned about it, they could always just grant her a title and make her nobility before the wedding.[royalty's done that in the past] Arent they already giving her family some kind of coat of arms so she'll have one for when she marries?
Oh, and to everyone saying that if royalty only marries royalty they'll eventually run into incest...I hate to break it to you but the royals are already descended from inbred lines. And to someone else's post about how Queen Victoria married off all of her children/grandchildren into the royal families of europe and 'you dont think shes the first one to do that' she wasnt. I'm not saying incest is good or anything Im just kind of confused as to how you guys dont know any of that already. o.O
and another thing to the people who are saying its a wedding and it should be private and since it's so public its not as special or real, who says a wedding HAS to be private to make it special? I dont remember that being a requirement. I thought you were supposed to be aloud to have your wedding be how you dream of it being. So if it's public and it's what they want why shouldn't they be allowed to have it? Besides hasnt anyone else realized it might be a sign of goodwill for the public that they want everyone included? Most of the people complaining now about how public it is would have been the first people to complain if it had been private. You wouldve been demanding what they have to hide and how dare they think they're better than us that they dont want us to see the wedding blah blah blah. Also it is theyre choice. Im pretty positive if they wanted it to be a private affair they couldve had it that way. If you dont like it, dont watch it. And, if you couldnt care less about it whyre you in the forum discussing it anyways?