So, puns aside, artificial intelligence largely depends on what you define as intelligent behavior.
For example, if you could map out the exact workings of the visual cortex, which is, by and large, a pattern recognition machine (it even works like a machine and tends to ignore bits it doesn't recognize), then a machine capable of visual perception wouldn't be particularly intelligent. It would mimic another machine. However, as far as modern theoreticians go, visual perception is seen as a possible proof of a true artificial intelligence.
As for my own expectation, an artificial intelligence would need to be able to form complex decisions based on inferred data.
For example, when presented with an incomplete set of data, such as the coordinates of a soccer goal, the artificial intelligence should be able to work out the most likely position, extrapolate the both fastest and safest path and then shoot the ball out of its own volition.
I hope whoever develops a true artificial intelligence implements the three laws of robotics better than Hollywood has done for the sake of entertainment.