Caffeinated Sky Pirate
II Xero II
Caffeinated Sky Pirate
II Xero II
Caffeinated Sky Pirate
Actually, Snacks is an old member. Very, very old. And it was the old members that screamed for his banhammer to return.
And, you're missing the point. I suppose abstract thought is too much for you.
You said that a third grader could be right where it needs to be, for a third grader.
Well, if your IQ is 68, you're right where you need to be if you're retarded.
Furthermore, a third grader could be intelligent "for a third grader", but that doesn't make the third grader any more intelligent than a person who has no mental incompetency, who is at least twice the child's age.
Well of course, because they're in the third ******** grade, and the person who is twice their age will more than likely have a higher IQ of course. Your point still makes absolutely no sense at all, and I suppose you're going to try and tell me that it's because "I'm not smart," right?
All I see you doing is proving my point, not yours. Being right where you should be does not a good reason for labeling them unintelligent make :T
By the way, Snacks was a moron, a *****, and a corrupted b*****d. :T
Yes, because you lack the ability to think abstractly, you cannot understand what I'm saying. I've lied it out for you many times.
If a third grader is eight, and is intelligent for an eight year old, that still doesn't make it intelligent. That makes it better than an average eight year old. However, could this eight year old grasp concepts it has not lived long enough to learn? Doubtful. It isn't wrong of me to be aware that I'm more intelligent than an eight year old, and that an eight year old is pretty dumb. Being intelligent "for ____" does not mean you're intelligent. In fact, when someone says "You're intelligent for a ____" it's usually meant as an indirect insult, or playfully, to poke fun at someone.
I wasn't aware Snacks was just like over 9000% of the members of the different chans. But, people did scream for his return. As far as I'd heard, the creator the chans argued with Snacks, and as a petty move, banned his IPs. Snacks retaliated by making new IPs and screwing with the chan sites. The larger portion of the community wanted Snacks back because he enforced the rules, and Snacks was allowed back. I don't know if he left again, though.
But looking down on an eight year old for the fact that you're supposedly more intelligent because you're older still makes you full of yourself, and frankly, thinking that about a mere child is rather low. It only proves my point of how much of an a*****e you're making yourself out to be.
Besides, I've met children who are living disproof to your statements. Children are more than capable of grasping the level of intelligence we are. All it takes is teaching it to them and starting them off early enough, so even this point is untrue.
And snacks was also a moron for giving people the banhammer for no reason at all and just randomly doing s**t like that. He's not even a good admin, and actually I do believe he did disappear : / I haven't seen the f** in a while, but that's irrelevant. My points above still stand.
When did I say I was looking down upon them? I simply said a person of average intelligence, around my age, would typically be more intelligent than an eight year old.
I've heard of children who disprove what I've said, but I was following your pattern of generalizing the public.
There was an 11 or 12 year old who graduated from college not too long ago.
However... This child didn't grasp a lot of simple concepts. He'd devoted himself so surely to his work, and school, and advancing his knowledge, he never learned the meaning of fun, or happiness. He was quoted saying he doesn't do anything that isn't for the betterment of humanity.
I don't believe intelligence focuses on 2+2=4, I believe it goes across a wide range of life skills, abilities, and experiences. You never truly understand something until you've lived through it. Although you might have the best guess possible, and you'll know that the factors will cause anger, confusion, sadness, and annoyance, therefore causing a break up, which will lead to an argument, you've still never been in that situation, and thus do not know the exact emotions, or how things will exactly play out.
I'd heard that Snacks banned people for no reason sometimes, but when I read examples of people's claims, it was shown that what Snacks did was perfectly fine. See, most admins/mods will just delete a post that violates some rule, or is deemed stupid as ********. Snacks would ban for that. A majority of people loved him, and what he did, that's all I'm saying.
Your definition of intelligence =/= a literal definition. That would be making intelligence out to be a relative term, which it isn't.
Intelligence is defined by knowledge, whether you think so or not. Look it up.
I believe the term you're looking for is wisdom, perhaps? But that's also debatable.
Frankly I see nothing wrong with this child, so long as he's being productive and intelligent. The problems you're describing are best left not experienced, aren't they? And by the way, posting online about them doesn't always help either, y'know.
And with that, I retire for the night :T if you want to keep talking, I'm quite open later this morning after I've gotten some sleep. If not, it was nice debating with you, so I'll be a good sport and call "good match," eh wot? :T
Adieu, if you'd like to continue, I'm more than happy to later today. Thanks for the nice little brain jog, though.
100
100
200
100
200
50
250
200
100
