Designated Panda
(?)Community Member
Offline
- Report Post
- Posted: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:56:39 +0000
sir_Clip
I respond to this? I thought I did. This is what I don’t understand about history they say now we are more accepting as such which in my opinion there was more accepting back when it wasn’t just paraded everywhere… well except Rome but people didn’t talk about it back then… like I think it’s gross how accepting it was to have not concubines and it was popular to have so and most of the time those boys were mistreated
The level of acceptance really depends on a lot of things really. In ways, we are less accepting depending on the civilization we're talking about. A lot of native people had more than 2 genders before colonization happened. I know of at least one same-sex couple that didn't just exist in Ancient Egypt, but they had a burial celebrating their love for each other. However, in Ancient Rome same-sex attraction was somewhat common, but it was still not allowed on the level it is now. There were so many rules about what was proper and improper. I am reading a lot about queer history lately and it's all really fascinating. Before WWII Germany was a very welcoming place for queer and trans people. Then Nazis took power and the first thing they did was burn all the books related to queer studies. It was a huge setback.
To a degree we've moved past that and people are coming out sooner than they would have when I was growing up. So, things are better to a degree? I do know that poverty and homelessness disproportionately affect people of the LGBTQ+ community. It's a really complicated topic.
To a degree we've moved past that and people are coming out sooner than they would have when I was growing up. So, things are better to a degree? I do know that poverty and homelessness disproportionately affect people of the LGBTQ+ community. It's a really complicated topic.