silkandflowers
Kuja v6
silkandflowers
Keltoi Samurai
silkandflowers
yeah, i know, you quoted it in the other thread. that's why i said it - i don't really care what the founding fathers of the usa said. for one thing, they were all men. for another, most of them owned slaves. they were not exactly paragons of justice, in my eyes.
quelle surprise
so they were men, and some of them owned slaves. therefore, the solution is obviously to burn the innocent along with the guilty.
because . . . well, it didn't work for Pol Pot, but it WOULD work for a woman, right?
lol, nevermind. it's not that i actually want innocent men to suffer. it's that, given a choice between protecting children from rapists and accidentally throwing an innocent man in jail, i'm always going to choose 'protect children'. i don't feel that the ideals of usa's founding fathers are sacrosanct.
that's all.
Huh.
It's not that I actually want innocent blacks to suffer, it's that, given a choice between protecting white people from black murderers and accidentally throwing an innocent black in jail, I'm always going to choose "protect white people."
That's all.
Because obviously, instilling irrational fear of an entire category of people in young children will "protect" them in the long run.
I like you, Silk. People like you give hope to fascists everywhere.
just out of curiosity, how have you not been banned yet. everything that comes out of your mouth is a pile of bigoted garbage, and it's beyond obvious that everything you do and say here is an attempt to be the most offensive piece of s**t possible
Apparently you're confused as to why there's a "v6" at the end of his username. Banning a person doesn't prevent them from simply making a new account.
However, racist, idiotic and contradictory as his statement was (the "not wanting innocent blacks to suffer" contradicts his past statements about "shooting unarmed niggers being preemptive self defense" ), the logic isn't not too far off from what you said. There's not much of a point in having a legal system if "protecting the children" means letting those falsely accused of rape just for cuddling with their under-age girlfriend being punished alongside those who actually DID commit rape- half the reason we have a legal system is to prevent s**t like that.
Just because I think dating an under-age girl is a bad idea doesn't mean I think one should have their life ruined due to false accusations. Now if he HAD actually had sex with her, then he's s**t outta luck, but so far there's no evidence that it actually happened.