Welcome to Gaia! ::

HIGH MINDS

Back to Guilds

Discussion of legal, medical and cultural issues surrounding cannabis (reference library and advocacy resources available) 

Tags: cannabis, marijuana, weed, sativa, indica 

Reply Reference Library
Study Finds No Cancer-Marijuana Connection

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit


chibi-faolan

Vice Captain

Modern Antiquarian

PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2007 7:17 pm


The Washington Post
Study Finds No Cancer-Marijuana Connection
Friday, May 26, 2006
(source)


The largest study of its kind has unexpectedly concluded that smoking marijuana, even regularly and heavily, does not lead to lung cancer.

The new findings "were against our expectations," said Donald Tashkin of the University of California at Los Angeles, a pulmonologist who has studied marijuana for 30 years.

"We hypothesized that there would be a positive association between marijuana use and lung cancer, and that the association would be more positive with heavier use," he said. "What we found instead was no association at all, and even a suggestion of some protective effect."

Federal health and drug enforcement officials have widely used Tashkin's previous work on marijuana to make the case that the drug is dangerous. Tashkin said that while he still believes marijuana is potentially harmful, its cancer-causing effects appear to be of less concern than previously thought.

Earlier work established that marijuana does contain cancer-causing chemicals as potentially harmful as those in tobacco, he said. However, marijuana also contains the chemical THC, which he said may kill aging cells and keep them from becoming cancerous.

Tashkin's study, funded by the National Institutes of Health's National Institute on Drug Abuse, involved 1,200 people in Los Angeles who had lung, neck or head cancer and an additional 1,040 people without cancer matched by age, sex and neighborhood.

They were all asked about their lifetime use of marijuana, tobacco and alcohol. The heaviest marijuana smokers had lighted up more than 22,000 times, while moderately heavy usage was defined as smoking 11,000 to 22,000 marijuana cigarettes. Tashkin found that even the very heavy marijuana smokers showed no increased incidence of the three cancers studied.

"This is the largest case-control study ever done, and everyone had to fill out a very extensive questionnaire about marijuana use," he said. "Bias can creep into any research, but we controlled for as many confounding factors as we could, and so I believe these results have real meaning."

Tashkin's group at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA had hypothesized that marijuana would raise the risk of cancer on the basis of earlier small human studies, lab studies of animals, and the fact that marijuana users inhale more deeply and generally hold smoke in their lungs longer than tobacco smokers -- exposing them to the dangerous chemicals for a longer time. In addition, Tashkin said, previous studies found that marijuana tar has 50 percent higher concentrations of chemicals linked to cancer than tobacco cigarette tar.

While no association between marijuana smoking and cancer was found, the study findings, presented to the American Thoracic Society International Conference this week, did find a 20-fold increase in lung cancer among people who smoked two or more packs of cigarettes a day.

The study was limited to people younger than 60 because those older than that were generally not exposed to marijuana in their youth, when it is most often tried.
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 8:06 pm


Oh wow.

I actually find this surprising,
despite as much of an advocate I am for legalizing marijuana...
I thought that any form of smoke causes cancer.

Wow.
Haha

fleur d-octobre



chibi-faolan

Vice Captain

Modern Antiquarian

PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:54 pm


I know what you mean... I mean, even the researchers were surprised.

And if I'm remembering right, Tashkin had been saying for a long time that marijuana smoke causes cancer, so for him in particular to so publicly recant, and moreover to postulate that it may in some ways protect against some cancers, pretty strongly suggests that the results were pretty unequivocal.

The hypothesis as to why seems very logical and simply, too -- that the chemicals are at low enough doses in cigarettes to damage the cells but not kill them, causing them to mutate and become malignant, but that the higher levels of the same chemicals in marijuana smoke simply kill the cells outright, and they're then filtered out of the body in its normal processes.

It'll be interesting to see if they're pursuing that question now, and what the results might be...
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:38 am


chibi-faolan
I know what you mean... I mean, even the researchers were surprised.

And if I'm remembering right, Tashkin had been saying for a long time that marijuana smoke causes cancer, so for him in particular to so publicly recant, and moreover to postulate that it may in some ways protect against some cancers, pretty strongly suggests that the results were pretty unequivocal.

The hypothesis as to why seems very logical and simply, too -- that the chemicals are at low enough doses in cigarettes to damage the cells but not kill them, causing them to mutate and become malignant, but that the higher levels of the same chemicals in marijuana smoke simply kill the cells outright, and they're then filtered out of the body in its normal processes.
rofl
It'll be interesting to see if they're pursuing that question now, and what the results might be...
Hmmm, would that be interesting if studys show you should use it as a preventive measures agaist cancer! It would be know as like, taking an Asprin onece a day. Well if that's the case I think I'm well on my way to being cancer free....FOREVER!

TamikoSun



faolan

Captain

O.G. Gaian

PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:19 pm


Except that aspirin is an NSAID (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) and prolonged use raises your risk of stomach ulcers and other gastro-intestinal problems.

Aspirin, ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin), naproxen (Aleve)... most of the common painkillers are NSAIDS. Acetominophen (Tylenol) isn't, but prolonged use of that one'll damage your liver even to the point of liver failure.

Which brings up an interesting point; cannabis is essentially the only painkiller that is safe for prolonged use. ^^;
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:52 am


Yeah, I just noticed yesterday when someone used NIDA as their source against marijuana(for the umpteenth time evil ) that it lists Tashkin as their reference for the claim that marijuana promotes cancer. lol

Woah Its Azure



chibi-faolan

Vice Captain

Modern Antiquarian

PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:17 pm


*facepalm* Oh, the value of keeping abreast of current information...

Well, by continuing to cite even one outdated, inaccurate piece of information, anything else on the site -- cited or not -- becomes questionable, and the whole site's essentially discredited. ^^
Reply
Reference Library

 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum