|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:04 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:06 pm
Is nothing within the grasp of the swine? gonk
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:09 pm
To be very fair...Most 'popular' franchises have a candy for them. Transformers has M&M's, Harry Potter had jelly beans...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:10 pm
Hoshit, son. They touched mah candy. Ah well, it is to be expected.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:11 pm
Definitely expected. Movies tend to get on a certain candy to advertise more.
I saw the sweethearts in a store yesterday. Kinda sad.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:01 pm
A crappy candy for a crappy franchise I say
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:06 pm
Hate to break it to you...but they've been on sweethearts since March. neutral
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:45 am
Simplistic-Tyranny Hate to break it to you...but they've been on sweethearts since March. neutral Yeah, the candy thing has been going on for a while by now. As long as I don't see television advertisements for said candy, I'm fine.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 4:32 am
I got some for my birthday.How fail.But yeah, this was predictable.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|