Great Lakes haze
Gaia and TekTek had a perfectly amiable relationship for
11 years, fer godsake!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's not like the Gaia administration didn't know AND approve, the whole time!
So how come ALL OFF A SUDDEN, they step back, gasp with surprise and shock, get all offended and aggrieved, and send a C&D letter???
And if as some people seem to be saying in this thread, it was for an advertising issue that is more recent, then guess what? There is a device that people frequently use for problem solving. It's called
A TELEPHONE. You pick it up and have
A CONVERSATION. (Human-to-human, I mean.) There is no need to go all high-powered lawyer on a person with whom Gaia has had very friendly relations for a very long time.
THIS IS RIDICULOUS.
I agree, even if what Tekton did was shady, I think its a stretch to completely believe Gaia, either after their track record. They say they tried asking him nicely to take the ads down, but have trouble buying that, when they've had a historically zero tolerance policy on people advertising other sites. What I mean is, if they'd been negotiating for longer, don't you think they would have stopped advertising tektek/banned linked tektek avis until an agreement was reached? They've suspended user IPs over similar, but lesser offenses in the past, so why weren't they as rigorous to cover their bases for the potential year R.Me had been advertised? That's what feels fishy to me.
Also, the C&D had nothing to do with Tekton using tektek to advertise R.Me but states "copyright infringement" as the primary basis for the site's removal in the letter. So they're not even staying consistent with their reasons for taking it down. Another red flag. And it doesn't help that they steal from other people's work to make money either (Even ignoring the so-called "parody" items from anime/manga/videogames/TV shows/etc., how many GC mods were likely copied from clothing websites? We know Gaia looks at them, considering they've had deals with brands like Macy's in the past).