IronySandwich
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 05:11:53 +0000
LoveLoud837
IronySandwich
LoveLoud837
logical fallacy, of course, an agnostic can believe in a God but not know which god it believes in.
Fun fact: a single person can have more than one description that applies to them.
This hypothetical person is a theist. They believe in a God. Their agnosticism is irrelevant.
What you are doing is like objecting to someone being called blonde by pointing out that they are right handed.
A false dilemma is a type of informal fallacy that involves a situation in which limited alternatives are considered, when in fact there is at least one additional option.
this is the logical fallacy.
Are we going to attack eachother about logical fallacies, when you're clearly wrong, or are we going to discuss the topic?
What you are doing is like telling your buddy who is trying to get a game of football going that you can't tie your shoes.
It is not a false dilemma to point out when a pair of words is literally a dichotomy, as is theist/atheist. There are not other "options". There can be ambiguity, and plenty of "it's complicated", but none of that makes a word pair where one set is literally defined as the compliment the another set have a "third way".
Your example makes no sense. Those two options are clearly unrelated, and I'm not the one trying to claim that a position on topic A prevents a person from taking a position on unrelated topic B. You are the one putting forth a false dilemma by saying that a person who is an agnostic theist can't be a theist because they are agnostic.