Department of Mysteries
M a l c c h i a t o
@Department of Mysteries: I'm inclined to disagree to a certain extent about the n****e chains. There is a stigma about nudity, and frankly, I think it's ridiculous. Most people don't walk around in public naked, however and if it's a shirtless male wearing chained n****e clamps in public, well, that's his prerogative. If a child is in a situation where someone is completely nude with various gear I think the real problem is why is the child exposed to that, not the other way around.
Yes, but what if that person was wandering around and happened to pass a park or a school yard or something? I do understand what you mean though. :3 I'm more inclined to say that I disagree entirely. I see no reason why children shouldn't see such things. Again, it's perpetuating the idea that what we do is not normal. Children see their parents kiss and sometimes smack each other on the bum. Why should they not see someone being led around on a leash or something more revealing?
I have my own ideas, which is why I'm not going to get too much into it. However, I will say that I started BDSM way before it was legal for me too, and I turned out just fine. Additionally, I was exposed to BDSM-related concepts from as young as two and three years old - hell, I held floggers in my hands at three years old and wore leather when I was four and even younger. I think that people are so caught up in the fact that everyone says that children shouldn't be exposed to it so they prefer to go along with the pack mentality rather than formulating their own opinions and actually witnessing those who HAVE been exposed to it from a young age (which generally end up fine individuals).
Also, let me add that my family had a summer home in a nudist resort. Literally everyone was naked 24/7. So if that's allowed, if children as young as three, four, five are allowed to be in the company of nude adults, why not around BDSM-inclined individuals?