Desideraht
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 00:58:36 +0000
ofallthethingyouknow
Dude, again with the generalising. Just because it isn't aesthetically pleasing to you doesn't mean it's not aesthetically pleasing to everyone who 'knows what a p***s looks like'. I do not continue to ignore your issues with the phalloplasty, I just don't see it as relevant. A realistic glans etc has nothing to do with the 'point' that saline pumps exist, that phalloplasty has sensation (though I will concede that sometimes things go wrong) and that aesthetics is in the eye of the beholder.
You said 'FtMs just plain don't have functionality', which isn't true - they have SOME functionality, even if you would not consider that they have ALL functionality. Aesthetics is debatable.
It's not a personal attack to clarify what surgery is available. Your post was generalising, I clarified, the end.
You said 'FtMs just plain don't have functionality', which isn't true - they have SOME functionality, even if you would not consider that they have ALL functionality. Aesthetics is debatable.
It's not a personal attack to clarify what surgery is available. Your post was generalising, I clarified, the end.
You removed that statement from the context of me saying I would not trade one fully-functioning part unless I could get another fully-functioning part. Context is everything.
You're the only one talking about "personal attacks" here.