the Samael
Reverend_Jello
the Samael
Sure, I have plenty of faith in things that I
have confirmed to be true and real, like my five senses and the law of gravity.
The burden of proof lies upon you, not me. There is no proof that a deity exists and therefore I see no reason to subscribe to any of your silly religious philosophies.
I am not trying to prove a Deity exists, but your own five senses are only proven by themselves or by science, which is reliant on the five senses anyway. Did you even read my first post?
Yes, I read it. You've stated that things that are self-evident are generally accepted as fact. That's a given: it's self-evident that I can see, hear, taste, smell and touch. I already know I can. I also know that when I throw a ball into the air, it comes back down to the ground. These things are self-evident.
The existence of a deity is not self-evident. There's a difference between faith and blind faith.
The reason those things are "self-evident" is because we put faith in them for so long that they become second nature. To people who believe in a Deity strongly enough and for a long enough time that Deity is self-evident. Let's say a man's wife is sick, so he makes a sacrifice at a temple of Apollo, the Greek god of sunlight, medicine and healing, and his wife gets better. To him that is proof and self-evidence that Apollo has accepted his sacrifice, is real, and has healed his wife, but we may have other explanations.
By science's own system of proof and by our own senses' system of proof they are self-evident. Just the same, if people put faith in the Torah long enough they consider its own words to be self-evident proof.