The Living Force
(?)Community Member
- Posted: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 17:32:01 +0000
TRIGGER WARNING This thread is discussing a topic related to sexual assault and/or rape which may be triggering to survivors.
So, y'all'll probably remember the thread a while back about Virginia trying to pass a law obligating women to have an intrusive and unnecessary vaginal ultrasound. Y'all might even remember that the VA Governor shot it down as being ridiculous and intrusive.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/04/opinion/sunday/kristof-when-states-abuse-women.html?_r=2&src=tp
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodocs/82R/billtext/pdf/HB00015F.pdf#navpanes=0
Well a similar bill passed in Texas. Not news, right? "Rick Perry's state attacks women, coulda told ya that."
Interestingly, up until 2003, the vaginal ultrasound would have violated the state's anti-sodomy laws. Of course, they had to change that law, but it seems they only wanted it in capacities where "artificial penetration" was used in consensual relationships.
So, here's what we can discuss:
Legality issues
Women's Rights in regards to not having to be effectively raped (rape with a device counts as rape, as does obligating sex or sex-like activities for something; it's rape to tell someone, "If you want antibiotics, suck my d**k," so this is likewise rape: "If you want an abortion, spread your legs so I can stick this in you a little bit." )
Idea of war on women in general
So, y'all'll probably remember the thread a while back about Virginia trying to pass a law obligating women to have an intrusive and unnecessary vaginal ultrasound. Y'all might even remember that the VA Governor shot it down as being ridiculous and intrusive.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/04/opinion/sunday/kristof-when-states-abuse-women.html?_r=2&src=tp
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodocs/82R/billtext/pdf/HB00015F.pdf#navpanes=0
Well a similar bill passed in Texas. Not news, right? "Rick Perry's state attacks women, coulda told ya that."
Interestingly, up until 2003, the vaginal ultrasound would have violated the state's anti-sodomy laws. Of course, they had to change that law, but it seems they only wanted it in capacities where "artificial penetration" was used in consensual relationships.
So, here's what we can discuss:
Legality issues
Women's Rights in regards to not having to be effectively raped (rape with a device counts as rape, as does obligating sex or sex-like activities for something; it's rape to tell someone, "If you want antibiotics, suck my d**k," so this is likewise rape: "If you want an abortion, spread your legs so I can stick this in you a little bit." )
Idea of war on women in general