|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 6:53 pm
With our physical bodies, we can grab physical objects. Everybody knows this. But doesn't that mean a shadow should be able to grab other shadows with kinetics? And if you could, seeing as the object controls the shadow, if you move the shadow, couldn't you also move the object? It seems simple logic to me. What does everybody else think? Could this work?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:00 pm
It's similar to the idea that if you move an object's astral counterpart then could you get the physical object to move.
I'm not sure. It might seem like it would work, but I'd try it first.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:30 pm
But aren't shadows reflections of objects, here? The shadow can disappear and the object remains?
Perhaps somewhere where this is different, you could.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:17 am
stare Shadows have no energy, infact they are more like the absence of energy. Now there is "shadow" energy but that just absorbs light.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 6:16 pm
No. At least, I don't think so. I really, really don't think so.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 6:38 pm
Dear God, I hope not. o__O;; If my friend were to poke my shadow and it moved I think I'd run screaming to the next room... -__-;;
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:16 am
Shadows are just places where less light falls... how can they do anything, let alone grab something? They are not tangable, conscious beings... they are just... well, shadows. confused
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|