|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:15 pm
C. Brothers... Do you think the world will ever populate over 1 mole? 
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:26 pm
Oh Em Effing Gee!
*falls over laughing*
Curse you and your chemistry reminders! >_<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:30 pm
///+ Buzz Bro... +///
THERE IS NO WAY!!!
Because we would die out... since there will not be enough room in the world, or enough resources to supports us all. So we would all die before we reached that horrendous number.
///+ ...Blue+///
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:36 pm
buzzkid24
///+ Buzz Bro... +///
THERE IS NO WAY!!!
Because we would die out... since there will not be enough room in the world, or enough resources to supports us all. So we would all die before we reached that horrendous number.
///+ ...Blue+///Nah, we'll colonize space beforee that happens. Space...Space....space....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:43 pm
but this world will NEVER be able to support 6.022 x 10^23 individuals... there's just plain not enough space... let alone actual subsistence for said individuals... o.o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:57 pm
C. Brothers... We had to answer this question in Chemistry.
Boy did I have a CRAP LOAD to say about! I'm serious what I wrote could have been a novel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:06 pm
Actually, humanity is decelrating in reproduction right now. England's population has gone down since its peak in 2002.
So it's true, Reality TV DOES make you gay.
- - - - -
Besides, a superior organism like Grey Goo will have wiped us out long before that point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:08 pm
I don't get it.
Be populated by one mole?
Over-populate the mole?
I'm seriously in need of a brain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:11 pm
weddingsakura I don't get it. Be populated by one mole? Over-populate the mole? I'm seriously in need of a brain. C. Brothers...
1 mole in Chemistry equals:
602,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 or 6.02x10²³
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:14 pm
The REAL question is if it will ever exceed Graham's Number. :roflcopter:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:24 pm
Whoa, I've never seen such a big a number O:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:24 pm
gthb weddingsakura I don't get it. Be populated by one mole? Over-populate the mole? I'm seriously in need of a brain. C. Brothers...
1 mole in Chemistry equals:
602,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 or 6.02x10²³
And that number corresponds to the number of atoms in 12 grams of carbon 12... and is useful for calculating nuclear reactions, and also as a knowledge backdrop of knowing how to convert between number of moles of a substance, and number of grams... o.o and if i'm not mistaken, the 6.022 x 10^23 number is Avagrado's number... o.o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:32 pm
Sibeiko gthb weddingsakura I don't get it. Be populated by one mole? Over-populate the mole? I'm seriously in need of a brain. C. Brothers...
1 mole in Chemistry equals:
602,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 or 6.02x10²³
And that number corresponds to the number of atoms in 12 grams of carbon 12... and is useful for calculating nuclear reactions, and also as a knowledge backdrop of knowing how to convert between number of moles of a substance, and number of grams... o.o and if i'm not mistaken, the 6.022 x 10^23 number is Avagrado's number... o.o C. Brothers...
Ya we just learned all that last week. So lame. And we still have to do more of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
