|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 8:56 pm
As full moon rises Let the sword swing and blood spill Flowers unflinching
the Demon
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:02 pm
Let our chins hang low Not blood but sorrow flowing Our lover's embrace
the Demon
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:06 pm
My hatred for you Making love in purest form Cannot be quenched
the Demon
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:13 pm
Despise oh! Despise Reading lips of jagged stell turn dark into light
the Demon
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 9:31 pm
A tale of greatness A man of ill-fatedness An adventures doom
From great heights he fell Forlorn and weeping he went Fishermen saved him
Loved by a lass Lived in a village loves Longs for homeward bound
Ready he went forth Risky his journey appeared Relent he did not
the Demon
(Sadly the next stanza was impossible for me to write since I couldn't find any good starting words. Does anyone know if this is an open of closed haiku?? It isn't a brain buster, when you answer, why is it either or?)
the Demon
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:07 am
Demon,
As much as I love your commitment to the traditional style haiku, the only proper way to use it is in Japanese.
I did a paper last year on it, and discovered that translated into English, very, very few haikus will be 5-7-5 syllabic structure.
Try a more loose structure, adapted for English. It's complicated, but go to google and search for Modern Haiku or American Haiku or English Haiku.
The other thing is, try to avoid words like "quenched" in your haikus, as you used it as a bisyllabic word, even though it is one, perhaps one and a half.
Still, I commend you on writing so many of them in a kind of tragic poem. Very unique. 3nodding
Vale, -LD
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:27 pm
Hey, that's some good haikus, a few parts you could fix up, but I like it! 3nodding Very nice how you put it into a little story too. biggrin
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 6:04 pm
I like it. No critique for now. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:30 pm
Leavaros Demon, As much as I love your commitment to the traditional style haiku, the only proper way to use it is in Japanese. I did a paper last year on it, and discovered that translated into English, very, very few haikus will be 5-7-5 syllabic structure. Try a more loose structure, adapted for English. It's complicated, but go to google and search for Modern Haiku or American Haiku or English Haiku. The other thing is, try to avoid words like "quenched" in your haikus, as you used it as a bisyllabic word, even though it is one, perhaps one and a half. Still, I commend you on writing so many of them in a kind of tragic poem. Very unique. 3nodding Vale, -LD You know, I almost got mad at this message. But then I realised, there is no website on the net that tells people everything that I know, and I've been training myself not to get anxious or mad at ignorant people. I fully understand tradition Haiku can only be written in Japanese, and I don't particularily like western style haiku, or Modern Western-Japanese Poetry. So I improvise. Quenched is bi-syllabic, "Quen" & "Ched". You're talking with an English major/teacher, very little I don't know, English Prof's are like God, omnipotent to the "T". I'm not being sour about criticism, I just find it hard to imagine anyone critiquing poetry, since in reality, unless you follow strict guidelines for developing your poem, no one can really have any say about it. Okay, maybe I am a bit bitter, but since I don't consider poetry as a literary art form (even though I'm paying like $800 to study it) and I don't at all consider it a noble action, nor does it give anyone any literary credibility. Poetry is the easy way out at I see it, but that's a rant for anther day. Poetry this, and Poetry that! All I have Now, is poetry ...that sucks. the Demon
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:39 am
Demon,
Now don't go beating yourself up; that's what I'm here for! wink
I see poetry FIRST as a literary art, and then as anything else. If we don't agree on that fundamental principal, than the rest becomes much more tangled. sweatdrop
I'm sorry if you feel that I was being overly harsh or flat out stupid, then I apologize. But "quenched" is a strange word, because it has the clear sound of a syllable, "quen" and the more guttural, almost indefinable "ched".
...Unless you read it like Shakespeare. And then it sounds perfectly fine! xp
Vale, -LD
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:02 am
Leavaros Demon, Now don't go beating yourself up; that's what I'm here for! wink I see poetry FIRST as a literary art, and then as anything else. If we don't agree on that fundamental principal, than the rest becomes much more tangled. sweatdrop I'm sorry if you feel that I was being overly harsh or flat out stupid, then I apologize. But "quenched" is a strange word, because it has the clear sound of a syllable, "quen" and the more guttural, almost indefinable "ched". ...Unless you read it like Shakespeare. And then it sounds perfectly fine! xp Vale, -LD What? Poetry coming first as a literary principal? What kind of cough medicine are you on? That's not a principal it's an opinion and duh, we both have differing opinions. Here's the standing: Leavaros: Poetry good, well natured, provocative, insightful, etc... Desert_Demon: Poetry (western) bad, numb, thoughtless, trivial, lacking in a need for talent, structureless, etc... Those aren't principals, those belong in schools, nor are they principles, rules that govern over something. I agree quenched is a very iffy word, but realise I wrote it at 12:30, or whatever Gaia time that is, so quenched was there and I used it. Not to mention it's a bit hypocritical for a poet to tell someone else what words to use their poetry, borderline arrogant.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:10 am
Desert_Demon Leavaros Demon, Now don't go beating yourself up; that's what I'm here for! wink I see poetry FIRST as a literary art, and then as anything else. If we don't agree on that fundamental principal, than the rest becomes much more tangled. sweatdrop I'm sorry if you feel that I was being overly harsh or flat out stupid, then I apologize. But "quenched" is a strange word, because it has the clear sound of a syllable, "quen" and the more guttural, almost indefinable "ched". ...Unless you read it like Shakespeare. And then it sounds perfectly fine! xp Vale, -LD What? Poetry coming first as a literary principal? What kind of cough medicine are you on? That's not a principal it's an opinion and duh, we both have differing opinions. Here's the standing: Leavaros: Poetry good, well natured, provocative, insightful, etc... Desert_Demon: Poetry (western) bad, numb, thoughtless, trivial, lacking in a need for talent, structureless, etc... Those aren't principals, those belong in schools, nor are they principles, rules that govern over something. I agree quenched is a very iffy word, but realise I wrote it at 12:30, or whatever Gaia time that is, so quenched was there and I used it. Not to mention it's a bit hypocritical for a poet to tell someone else what words to use their poetry, borderline arrogant. I didn't say poetry was a principal, though I did misspell principle. I said that poetry is nothing if not a literary art. That is the fundamental principle that we differ on. I love many different kinds of poetry, and neither Shakespeare nor Martial, while both Western writers, can be called, "thoughtless, trivial, [or] lacking in...talent". This is a principle because it determines everything that follows it. If not, it at least serves as a principle for us, because it determines how we look at poetry. Take things as individual, not grouped. It's rude--at best--to say that all Western poetry is "bad", and ignorant at worst. And I've stated time and again that arrogance is my worst personal demon and rears its ugly head at the worst times. For that, I apologize. Still, I meant it only as a critique, saying that it didn't sound right next to all the other writing. Anyway, I've got to go now, and I think I've got my point across. I anxiously await your reply, Demon. Vale, -LD
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 12:47 pm
I dunno Vale, I haven't read very many good western poems, or poems written by westerners or otherwise. As you can tell I'm not a huge fan of poetry, probably due to my golden days as an avid reviewer on Fanfiction.net and then later colonized myself onto FictionPress.com. It bothered me how poems of any length were being priased as if God himself had written it when the poem was nothing more than drivvel and a copy of the last person who had written about the same topic.
And now that I'm studying poetry professionally, it just makes me angry as anything to have to read more crap and listen to my prof just burst at the seems with at the poems in question. I've only read one that I liked which was called: (The) Charge of the Light Cavalry, which honoured the misguided charge of 600 cavalrymen who got the wrong order way back in the day when colonizing Africa was the cool thing to do.
I understand poetry and poems means something different to everyone despite technical factoids but still, it just bothers me because anyone can slap together a few stanzas and call it art. I watched an idiot boast his latest artistic genius at the Toronto Museum of Art, or someplace like it, it was a while ago and I don't remember the gallery's name. But the idiot had painted a 2x4 wood block bright solid yellow and was trying to convince people to buy it for $10,000. That's what I see poetry as, just a bunch of people doing one thing because it's easy. I respect anyone who can create a closed, structured poem, but the free verse today is like a cancer, no cure and it's everywhere.
I don't know who Martial is but I know Shakespeare only wrote his poems to make a slim living while constantly in fear of being executed by the Queen if his poetic plays didn't adhere somehow to her majesty's royal lineage. I also hardly consider the many works of Shakespeare poetry since most of them are acted out. I've read through his poetry and while a few struck a cord with me the rest was just something I would leave alone.
I'm not trying to deter anyone from liking poetry or even writing poetry, I can see people getting that idea from my statements I just have a problem with poetry and the millions who write it instead of learning or even attempting to produce something structured that requires skill. But that's just me being over zealous and protective of language from those who seek to destroy it through ignorant verse, and don't bother Vale about bringing up my vapid hypocracy as I write butchered Haiku's in the writing forum, I'm quite aware of my own hypocracy.
Anyway, I'm gonna finish this, not in the greatest of moods. And no, I don't nor will I ever regret saying something in anger, I mean everything I say, if I didn't, I'd be a liar, and liars are bad people.
the Demon
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 4:58 pm
Wow...that was...pointed. I've gotta tell you though, Martial is a great Roman poet. A hero, really. I think you'd like him. Look him up.
And not all free verse is crap. stare I write a lot of free verse, and I know good poetry. I like to think I write good poetry. I've never gotten a bad response on my poems, and there have been many.
You seem like a bitter young man who has given up on most people and the Western world. As my little brother might say, "Stop sipping on the haterade."
Anyway, I find that hte most important thing is to follow some form of rhythm or beat. True, you've gotta kiss a lot of frogs, but I'm sure you'll find you're prince. *grins too-sweetly* Or your queen.
Love and Vale, -LD
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:35 pm
Oh Vale, I wouldn't kiss you if you was wearing lipstick and were my type.
By the way, the "haterade" rip, genius, give my kudos to your bro.
I am a young man, only two years into adulthood. And I all but hate the western world, there are very few redeeming things we've invented here, or claimed to have invented. This is mainly due to our self-proclaimed importance, obsessive pride is ugly and disgusting, and the america's have far too much that.
I never said all free verse was crap, I hinted that most of it was crap. Nor did I say your writing was complete rubbish. It's kind of annoying when people take me too far at face value and overlook how I word my ideas. But we are all human.
It's kind of funny when you say that you know good poetry. I've never met anyone whose ever claimed such a thing. Every poet or poetry buff I've ever talked to says poetry is to be taken by the reader and either enjoyed or not enjoyed. Stating you know good poetry appeals to your ego and it may be true either because the people you advertise your observed poetry to enjoy the same things you do or don't have the heart to tell you otherwise.
I don't kiss frogs, princes or queens... no offense to you though wink . I prefer real people who can act real, or at the very least, appeal to my view of real.
the Demon
P.S. I meant america's, not American's.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|