|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:51 am
Very sorry if this has been already adressed but, there is indeed a loophole in our very-much loved Series. Has you should know in book 8, Violet was stripped of her clothes and was given a hospital gown to wear, she was wearing in till the end of the book right into book 9, she disguised herself. Still wearing the gown and took of her disguise in one of the chapter where Lemony specially says, Everyone but Violet where in their normal clothes, Violet was still in the gown from the hospital. So how come in book 10, the illustration by Helquist in the beginning of book 10 shows Violet in her normal clothes? Possibilities, 1. She pocketed them in the hospital. Doubt that because she was out cold. Did I miss something or is this indeed a loophole? There's another one but I want this adressed 1st.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 9:32 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 9:57 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:24 pm
how would she be able to change in like a few hours?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 7:02 pm
Hrmmm....good question. Perhaps the hospital gown was SO dreadful that Mr. Helquist couldn't bear to draw it anymore? ^^;;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:46 am
BH is a truly AMAZING artist (who is Mormon like me and he grew up in my town. YES!)... but maybe he just goofed up?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 2:12 am
rurouni_starchild Hrmmm....good question. Perhaps the hospital gown was SO dreadful that Mr. Helquist couldn't bear to draw it anymore? ^^;; Really good point!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:43 am
Mr.Helquist, I believe is ordered what to draw by Lemony. So I think Lemony Snicket screwed up. razz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:30 am
Katbot Mr.Helquist, I believe is ordered what to draw by Lemony. So I think Lemony Snicket screwed up. razz Oh yeah........... Or maybe, Mr Helquist decided to draw normal Violet, plainly because he wanted to confuddle us!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 9:48 am
Katbot Mr.Helquist, I believe is ordered what to draw by Lemony. So I think Lemony Snicket screwed up. razz I have to agree.. I think they just missed the detail and perhaps it just was to awful to draw.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:33 am
paradoxical Katbot Mr.Helquist, I believe is ordered what to draw by Lemony. So I think Lemony Snicket screwed up. razz I have to agree.. I think they just missed the detail and perhaps it just was to awful to draw. yup, probably!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 8:55 pm
The illistration are wrong most of the time anyway. For example: Olaf's tattoo keeps changing from book to book, in the Ersatz Elevator it said that the orphans slid down the banister on the oversized clothes but in the Illistration they were in normal clothes, and more that I cant think of.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 8:23 am
missing nin itachi The illistration are wrong most of the time anyway. For example: Olaf's tattoo keeps changing from book to book, in the Ersatz Elevator it said that the orphans slid down the banister on the oversized clothes but in the Illistration they were in normal clothes, and more that I cant think of. Yeah, when it comes to the illustrations they aren't always perfect but Helquist makes them wonderful either way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:28 am
paradoxical missing nin itachi The illistration are wrong most of the time anyway. For example: Olaf's tattoo keeps changing from book to book, in the Ersatz Elevator it said that the orphans slid down the banister on the oversized clothes but in the Illistration they were in normal clothes, and more that I cant think of. Yeah, when it comes to the illustrations they aren't always perfect but Helquist makes them wonderful either way. couldn't say it better my self!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:32 pm
Did you have to point that out emo ?!?!?! Oh, well. YES! THERE MUST BE A LOGICAL EXPLANATION!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
