|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:03 pm
As I write the following at this time I keep in mind the fresh thread were a guy claimed that some people deserved to be raped, while ignorant and unintelligent enough in myspace. However, he argued that it was by a process of Natural Selection. How does rape be associated if not ionfluenced or be shaped by natural selection and how if any are these associated?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:26 am
Kristinely As I write the following at this time I keep in mind the fresh thread were a guy claimed that some people deserved to be raped, while ignorant and unintelligent enough in myspace. However, he argued that it was by a process of Natural Selection. How does rape be associated if not ionfluenced or be shaped by natural selection and how if any are these associated? They're not really, he was just a troll, looking to annoy someone. Had he suggested killing them, he coulld have made a, not very good, case for eugenics. But raping them? No, that would do nothing of use. Hell, it would do the opposite. If some of them fell pregnant, and raised the kids, it would be spreading the "bad genes" as he would probably define them. In short, he's an idiot/troll. Ignore him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 1:32 pm
redem Kristinely As I write the following at this time I keep in mind the fresh thread were a guy claimed that some people deserved to be raped, while ignorant and unintelligent enough in myspace. However, he argued that it was by a process of Natural Selection. How does rape be associated if not ionfluenced or be shaped by natural selection and how if any are these associated? They're not really, he was just a troll, looking to annoy someone. Had he suggested killing them, he coulld have made a, not very good, case for eugenics. But raping them? No, that would do nothing of use. Hell, it would do the opposite. If some of them fell pregnant, and raised the kids, it would be spreading the "bad genes" as he would probably define them. In short, he's an idiot/troll. Ignore him. Thank you, I would have thought that for a 21 year old would perhaps be more mature, however, for someone to say that because the victims are dumb, hence their low levels of intelligence, then its by natural selection, yet intelligence varies per person, per age, per society, thus natural selection in no way can apply to this atrocity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:40 am
Thank you, I would have thought that for a 21 year old would perhaps be more mature, however, for someone to say that because the victims are dumb, hence their low levels of intelligence, then its by natural selection, yet intelligence varies per person, per age, per society, thus natural selection in no way can apply to this atrocity.
Maturity and intelligence are two different things.
Some one can be mature but uneducated in their opinions.
Then there is a mixture of the two: An idiot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 6:44 pm
Kristinely As I write the following at this time I keep in mind the fresh thread were a guy claimed that some people deserved to be raped, while ignorant and unintelligent enough in myspace. However, he argued that it was by a process of Natural Selection. How does rape be associated if not ionfluenced or be shaped by natural selection and how if any are these associated? That guy's argument wouldn't even make sense if he knew the definition of natural selection. I'm tired of people trying to use science as an excuse for their ignorance and violence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
