| what do u believe? |
| The universe came into being by itself by purely natural processes (known as evolution) so that no appeal to the supernatural is needed. |
|
71% |
[ 23 ] |
| The universe was created by God. |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
| The universe always existed. |
|
25% |
[ 8 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 8:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 8:25 pm
and im just provding you guys with the chance to make $250000
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 7:20 am
degus2222 and im just provding you guys with the chance to make $250000 No you're not. The terms of that are far too vague to be provable. Anyhoo, the sort of evolution you mean in the poll question is NOT simply called evolution. When used alone everyone presumes you are speaking of biological evolution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 7:22 am
Wait... DrDino? Even other creationists hate that dude! The crap he comes out with!
EVEN after he has been shown that he is simply lieing, he continues to repeat his lies. The man is a charlitan, look elsewhere for your preformed creationist nonsense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:52 pm
Please don't combine the origin of the universe (i.e. big bang theory) with evolutionary biology >.<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 1:32 am
Once upon a time there was a dog, whilst this dog was living, there all of a sudden was an earth. No-one knows how the earth came about as they were too distracted by the dog.
I don't know what I believe entirely, just not hooked on the whole god concept.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 8:56 am
Mmm, Hovind. degus2222, if by some chance you're still around you should take a look at this site and realise how much he's lied to you. "Subornation of false muster!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 4:22 pm
I think God was the big bang and that makes all of us little bits of God. So then anything we do IS an act of God! Woot! I need to get acts of god covered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 9:46 am
Actually, that's a rather interesting theory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 9:49 am
god, why is everyone usage the evolution soo set on biology... there is cosmic evo as well!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acrea-Teh-LogiC-Filter121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 12:39 pm
When using the term alone, it is presumed to refer to the theory of evolution, unless there is some specific context around the term.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 2:18 am
The word 'evolution' means change, beyond connotations in biology. 'Stellar evolution' for example is an observed process through which clouds of hydrogen condense, the hydrogen reacts, converts to helium and other heavier elements and then the star goes nova at the end of its life. The process takes billions of years, and the science is proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. Because creationists are thick as two short planks, they don't know the difference between natural or artificial selection and stellar evolution, and the fact that they don't 'believe' in solid physics is just as sign that they don't know what it is to believe or disbelieve in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acrea-Teh-LogiC-Filter121
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 6:30 pm
cosmic evolution... no cosmology
partical evolution... no... partical physics
stellar and planetary evolution... still not evo...
organic evolution... no abiogenesis... try again...
maCRO EVOLUTION...YES EVOLUTION...
MICRO EVO! WOOT!! EVO TOOZZ!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 2:28 pm
No empirical evidence for evolution? Please. You said the same thing about the Earth not revolving around the sun and the world being flat, but science proved you wrong, as it has multiple other times in the past. It's just that you don't want to pay attention to the empirical evidence, such as gradually changing fossils over time, which DO make evolution a scientifically viable theory. Rebuttal'd!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 8:08 pm
Real scientist don't differentiate between 'macro evolution' and 'micro evolution'. The term 'macro evolution' was inevented by creationists, and uttering it lowers you as a person. There is no such thing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
