|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 4:08 pm
Not really. It might sound nice, but it's creepy because you know that his soul isn't really in it. Link#1Compare to the original. Link#2I hope these link works.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 2:31 pm
Yeah thats pretty insane i hope you dont mind i shrinked the links cuz i cant stand stretched pages.
Still theres so much more you can do with your larynx that makes each sax player so unique. Multiphonics and such which cant be reproduced with a machine.
Still that's really insane that someone made a robot that can do stuff like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fashionable Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 2:38 pm
No no, thank you. I'm not so good with computer stuff.
Btw, I didn't know that machines can't do multiphonics. Then again, I don't know anything about playing them myself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 3:49 pm
Well i dont know if they can but i'm sure somebody has figured it out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fashionable Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 1:21 am
..People do the weirdest things. Honestly I hate any music that is comprised of organic instruments that are synthesized with machines. I think it's a cheap way of doing things and it loses emotion and feeling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 8:50 pm
See, this isn't meant to be serious. It's the novelty of it.
Besides, no serious jazz musician would try to play someone else's solo.
This one is actually different from Coltrane's, it's similar up to a point, if I remember right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
