|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 12:23 pm
It has come to my attention that while there are creationists who are worthy of debate, there are those who cannot seem to be sensical, cannot support their ideas with evidence, cannot argue correctly, for Anti-Christ's sake. This calls for a Black List of morons NOT to argue with. I submit this idea with a clear goal: knowing who to argue with.
1 razz ost the Gaian name(s) of the retarded rambler
2:Say what the moron has done to deserve being blacklisted.
3:Link to a thread which is especially demonstrative of such behavior.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 12:27 pm
The Black List is as follows: (in alphabetical order) Detrik (Endless Ad Hominems, unable to support statements with evidence) LinkPygosceles (Discards the scientific method as a whole, as well as logic itself) LinkPost yours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:25 am
There are so many little one line creationist who can barely type. I would suggest we ignore them for this list, and instead concentrate on the ones like you lalready mentioned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:49 am
Agreed. It's not like there aren't any little one-line anti-creationists who also cannot type, and it would take a much larger database to contain all such creationists.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 11:01 am
At the risk of sounding really stupid, I have a question:
What is an Ad Hominem?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 5:55 pm
Hypomanic Poet At the risk of sounding really stupid, I have a question: What is an Ad Hominem?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 7:27 pm
I had something like this before the new Guild system came about. It was called 'Top five most dangerous creationists'.
It eventually began to seem a bit absurd. I've forgotten why, but I'm sure it did.
Anyway, the fact is that there is nothing we can do about so-called 'problem creationists', and even if there were, you must remember that we are two diametrically opposed guilds. Both sides assume that the other side is merely being stubborn, and stupid. I say; neither side is trying hard enough. Just keep at it and whichever side is right will prevail.
Then again, neither guilds are my guilds. I just founded them, and I try to aid them.
If you think that a Black List is a good idea, then go ahead. I'm not about to go judging what's good and bad. I'm not God, I'm gigacannon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:21 am
OMG I hadn't realised you'd started the creationists guild aswell... fair play mate that is the epitomy of even handed logic. Do you give credence to creationism or did you just want someone to argue with?
And you're right you aren't very good at pro-creationism banners and such... I thought that one in your sig was being sarcastic...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 5:36 am
gigacannon I had something like this before the new Guild system came about. It was called 'Top five most dangerous creationists'. It eventually began to seem a bit absurd. I've forgotten why, but I'm sure it did. Anyway, the fact is that there is nothing we can do about so-called 'problem creationists', and even if there were, you must remember that we are two diametrically opposed guilds. Both sides assume that the other side is merely being stubborn, and stupid. I say; neither side is trying hard enough. Just keep at it and whichever side is right will prevail. Then again, neither guilds are my guilds. I just founded them, and I try to aid them. If you think that a Black List is a good idea, then go ahead. I'm not about to go judging what's good and bad. I'm not God, I'm gigacannon. I'm not one to judge regarding one's very opinion; of course, being a creationist isn't flattery to my eyes, but some offer up very good debate and I have debating with them; then there are those who are just annoying, whether they use a panoply of fallacies or choose willingly to ignore your arguments and saying "What you just said is wrong, I'm right, see? You're stupid!"... As much as I appreciate flaming, it just isn't as fulfilling as a good debate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:23 am
DarklingGlory OMG I hadn't realised you'd started the creationists guild aswell... fair play mate that is the epitomy of even handed logic. Do you give credence to creationism or did you just want someone to argue with? And you're right you aren't very good at pro-creationism banners and such... I thought that one in your sig was being sarcastic...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 6:35 am
Bahvanta DarklingGlory OMG I hadn't realised you'd started the creationists guild aswell... fair play mate that is the epitomy of even handed logic. Do you give credence to creationism or did you just want someone to argue with? And you're right you aren't very good at pro-creationism banners and such... I thought that one in your sig was being sarcastic... What? I did... sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2005 9:41 am
Anything a creationist says sounds sarcastic coming from someone who is not a creationist.
It's hard to talk about things that you know are wrong, and can prove are wrong. But I can exercise restraint for the purposes of fair play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 5:14 pm
gigacannon Anything a creationist says sounds sarcastic coming from someone who is not a creationist. It's hard to talk about things that you know are wrong, and can prove are wrong. But I can exercise restraint for the purposes of fair play. Now, setting aside the fact that I am "Creationist" (which I might add is a stupid name for us - we're Christians), maybe if this guild started giving explanations, we wouldn't think so disrespectfully of you, and we might listen to what you have to say. This guild seems to do nothing but talk about how you hate Christians - give your reasoning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 6:02 am
windswept_fury Now, setting aside the fact that I am "Creationist" (which I might add is a stupid name for us - we're Christians), maybe if this guild started giving explanations, we wouldn't think so disrespectfully of you, and we might listen to what you have to say. This guild seems to do nothing but talk about how you hate Christians - give your reasoning. We use the word Creatioists to denote a subset of Christians who believe in Creationism. I don't think anyone here has ever said we hate christians... Not that I can recall at least. Disliking creationism is not the same thing. And we will give explainations if you want them, but inside this guild we don't really need them much, so we don't post them. Whatever you want explained...ask.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 3:46 pm
redem We use the word Creatioists to denote a subset of Christians who believe in Creationism. There is no subset of christians that are creationist. Look it up - creationist means that you believe in the concept of creation. No true christian doesn't, because creation is in the Bible, which is true, relevant, and to be taken literally by Christian standards, unless you're methodist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
