|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:21 pm
I believe we should have joined Germany for WW II. Not many people know, but we were brought to the war by a Jewish man lying to our President. He told the President that the U.S.S. Sussex was being attacked by German forces. When our troops went there and blindly slaughtered innocent Germans for something they have not done. When the American soldiers arrived at the ship, it was fine. There was no damage done to the ship at all. We aided the weakest link. The Communist. We could have easily destroyed the Communist at the time. We gave them weapons and many other supplies. George Patton realized soon after seeing the disgusting Jews he knew that we have helped the wrong side. He stated that they threw all of their trash in the corner of the house. They never took showers. When he went to talk to the Rabbi he could smell him a mile away. Now why did we help these evil and disgusting people?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 8:30 pm
Maybe this will help answer your question. The link is certainly informational, whatever you may think or judge about it. --> "Is God Through With The Jew?" by a man named Walid, a former Muslim turned Christian (his testimony you can access in the link on the bottom by clicking on his name, which will direct you to the page). Before assuming things about Jews, which by the way the whole world wants to get rid of but hasn't been able to complete their mission for thousands of years, it would be interesting to look at the history of the Jews and what hardships they faced. It would be fair for all of us not to have a prejudiced point-of-view. Please keep an open mind, sir. smile Source of link: Dear Muslim, let me tell you why I believed(I know you're not Muslim, but I believe this will provide some interesting insight that I am sure will benefit you greatly)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:41 pm
I'd rather discuss how the U.S. bombed thousands of innocent civilians in Japan.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:23 pm
American business interests did side with Germany during WWII.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 9:40 am
Clover_IceQueen I'd rather discuss how the U.S. bombed thousands of innocent civilians in Japan. that's ok. they got MacArthur. I wish we would have got MacArthur. If you do your research, you'll realize they thanked us for stopping them. The only logical reason is because of MacArthur's actions to provide contrast in the following decades. The other three reasons is because they had become a fascist state, many still believed the Emperor was god, and the government was grinding people into a war most wanted to have stopped, but no one could. Thousands were bombed so that hundreds of millions might live and future generations could live in one of the most prosperous nations in human history. Have you seen the rights of Japanese before and after the MacArthur constitution? There's a huge difference. Some argue they had a better constitution than we did. Definitely true today after Bush and Obama.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:36 pm
Michael Noire Clover_IceQueen I'd rather discuss how the U.S. bombed thousands of innocent civilians in Japan. that's ok. they got MacArthur. I wish we would have got MacArthur. If you do your research, you'll realize they thanked us for stopping them. The only logical reason is because of MacArthur's actions to provide contrast in the following decades. The other three reasons is because they had become a fascist state, many still believed the Emperor was god, and the government was grinding people into a war most wanted to have stopped, but no one could. Thousands were bombed so that hundreds of millions might live and future generations could live in one of the most prosperous nations in human history. Have you seen the rights of Japanese before and after the MacArthur constitution? There's a huge difference. Some argue they had a better constitution than we did. Definitely true today after Bush and Obama. Hundreds of people still die from the radiation of the bombed areas. Also, they aren't very prosperous considering they're going through a depression right now.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 1:26 pm
Clover_IceQueen Michael Noire Clover_IceQueen I'd rather discuss how the U.S. bombed thousands of innocent civilians in Japan. that's ok. they got MacArthur. I wish we would have got MacArthur. If you do your research, you'll realize they thanked us for stopping them. The only logical reason is because of MacArthur's actions to provide contrast in the following decades. The other three reasons is because they had become a fascist state, many still believed the Emperor was god, and the government was grinding people into a war most wanted to have stopped, but no one could. Thousands were bombed so that hundreds of millions might live and future generations could live in one of the most prosperous nations in human history. Have you seen the rights of Japanese before and after the MacArthur constitution? There's a huge difference. Some argue they had a better constitution than we did. Definitely true today after Bush and Obama. Hundreds of people still die from the radiation of the bombed areas. Also, they aren't very prosperous considering they're going through a depression right now. The whole world is pretty much going through a depression. I can't think of a single country to go to.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 1:30 pm
YahuShalum Clover_IceQueen Michael Noire Clover_IceQueen I'd rather discuss how the U.S. bombed thousands of innocent civilians in Japan. that's ok. they got MacArthur. I wish we would have got MacArthur. If you do your research, you'll realize they thanked us for stopping them. The only logical reason is because of MacArthur's actions to provide contrast in the following decades. The other three reasons is because they had become a fascist state, many still believed the Emperor was god, and the government was grinding people into a war most wanted to have stopped, but no one could. Thousands were bombed so that hundreds of millions might live and future generations could live in one of the most prosperous nations in human history. Have you seen the rights of Japanese before and after the MacArthur constitution? There's a huge difference. Some argue they had a better constitution than we did. Definitely true today after Bush and Obama. Hundreds of people still die from the radiation of the bombed areas. Also, they aren't very prosperous considering they're going through a depression right now. The whole world is pretty much going through a depression. I can't think of a single country to go to. China is good financially, but environmentally and health-wise, I would not choose to live there.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 1:34 pm
Clover_IceQueen YahuShalum Clover_IceQueen Michael Noire Clover_IceQueen I'd rather discuss how the U.S. bombed thousands of innocent civilians in Japan. that's ok. they got MacArthur. I wish we would have got MacArthur. If you do your research, you'll realize they thanked us for stopping them. The only logical reason is because of MacArthur's actions to provide contrast in the following decades. The other three reasons is because they had become a fascist state, many still believed the Emperor was god, and the government was grinding people into a war most wanted to have stopped, but no one could. Thousands were bombed so that hundreds of millions might live and future generations could live in one of the most prosperous nations in human history. Have you seen the rights of Japanese before and after the MacArthur constitution? There's a huge difference. Some argue they had a better constitution than we did. Definitely true today after Bush and Obama. Hundreds of people still die from the radiation of the bombed areas. Also, they aren't very prosperous considering they're going through a depression right now. The whole world is pretty much going through a depression. I can't think of a single country to go to. China is good financially, but environmentally and health-wise, I would not choose to live there. Plus they're commie scum bags with a one child policy. Yeah no thanks I love talking s**t about governments so I'd be imprisoned quickly there. >.< Is that how this is going to go down? The worse humanitarian rights governments will have the only jobs? Damn are we really that enslaved now?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 1:38 pm
YahuShalum Clover_IceQueen YahuShalum Clover_IceQueen Michael Noire Clover_IceQueen I'd rather discuss how the U.S. bombed thousands of innocent civilians in Japan. that's ok. they got MacArthur. I wish we would have got MacArthur. If you do your research, you'll realize they thanked us for stopping them. The only logical reason is because of MacArthur's actions to provide contrast in the following decades. The other three reasons is because they had become a fascist state, many still believed the Emperor was god, and the government was grinding people into a war most wanted to have stopped, but no one could. Thousands were bombed so that hundreds of millions might live and future generations could live in one of the most prosperous nations in human history. Have you seen the rights of Japanese before and after the MacArthur constitution? There's a huge difference. Some argue they had a better constitution than we did. Definitely true today after Bush and Obama. Hundreds of people still die from the radiation of the bombed areas. Also, they aren't very prosperous considering they're going through a depression right now. The whole world is pretty much going through a depression. I can't think of a single country to go to. China is good financially, but environmentally and health-wise, I would not choose to live there. Plus they're commie scum bags with a one child policy. Yeah no thanks I love talking s**t about governments so I'd be imprisoned quickly there. >.< Is that how this is going to go down? The worse humanitarian rights governments will have the only jobs? Damn are we really that enslaved now? Personally, I don't like families with more than 5 kids. I know a family with 14 children. That's not healthy for the woman or the home. Can you imagine how crowded it is and how much it must cost to send all of those kids to school? No thanks. I'm sticking to 2 at the most xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 1:48 pm
Clover_IceQueen YahuShalum Clover_IceQueen YahuShalum Clover_IceQueen Hundreds of people still die from the radiation of the bombed areas. Also, they aren't very prosperous considering they're going through a depression right now. The whole world is pretty much going through a depression. I can't think of a single country to go to. China is good financially, but environmentally and health-wise, I would not choose to live there. Plus they're commie scum bags with a one child policy. Yeah no thanks I love talking s**t about governments so I'd be imprisoned quickly there. >.< Is that how this is going to go down? The worse humanitarian rights governments will have the only jobs? Damn are we really that enslaved now? Personally, I don't like families with more than 5 kids. I know a family with 14 children. That's not healthy for the woman or the home. Can you imagine how crowded it is and how much it must cost to send all of those kids to school? No thanks. I'm sticking to 2 at the most xd I wouldn't say it's not healthy for the woman or home. I guess it really depends on the situations? I believe it's a personal choice but yeah there are situations that suggest the people shouldn't even have one child. >.<
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 1:59 pm
YahuShalum Clover_IceQueen YahuShalum Clover_IceQueen YahuShalum Clover_IceQueen Hundreds of people still die from the radiation of the bombed areas. Also, they aren't very prosperous considering they're going through a depression right now. The whole world is pretty much going through a depression. I can't think of a single country to go to. China is good financially, but environmentally and health-wise, I would not choose to live there. Plus they're commie scum bags with a one child policy. Yeah no thanks I love talking s**t about governments so I'd be imprisoned quickly there. >.< Is that how this is going to go down? The worse humanitarian rights governments will have the only jobs? Damn are we really that enslaved now? Personally, I don't like families with more than 5 kids. I know a family with 14 children. That's not healthy for the woman or the home. Can you imagine how crowded it is and how much it must cost to send all of those kids to school? No thanks. I'm sticking to 2 at the most xd I wouldn't say it's not healthy for the woman or home. I guess it really depends on the situations? I believe it's a personal choice but yeah there are situations that suggest the people shouldn't even have one child. >.< It's not healthy for the woman for horomonal reasons. Childbirth can really mess up a woman's mind. With 14 kids, I'd be surprised if she wasn't stuck in a permanent state of Postmortem Depression.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:08 pm
Clover_IceQueen YahuShalum Clover_IceQueen YahuShalum Clover_IceQueen China is good financially, but environmentally and health-wise, I would not choose to live there. Plus they're commie scum bags with a one child policy. Yeah no thanks I love talking s**t about governments so I'd be imprisoned quickly there. >.< Is that how this is going to go down? The worse humanitarian rights governments will have the only jobs? Damn are we really that enslaved now? Personally, I don't like families with more than 5 kids. I know a family with 14 children. That's not healthy for the woman or the home. Can you imagine how crowded it is and how much it must cost to send all of those kids to school? No thanks. I'm sticking to 2 at the most xd I wouldn't say it's not healthy for the woman or home. I guess it really depends on the situations? I believe it's a personal choice but yeah there are situations that suggest the people shouldn't even have one child. >.< It's not healthy for the woman for horomonal reasons. Childbirth can really mess up a woman's mind. With 14 kids, I'd be surprised if she wasn't stuck in a permanent state of Postmortem Depression. That almost sounds like some Eugenics don't let them breed too much propaganda. All women will end up getting their hormonal imbalance in menopause anyways. I believe if there are any studies on it it would be truly inconclusive due to way too many varying factors. Humans don't fair too well in studies because of our diversity.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:11 pm
YahuShalum Clover_IceQueen YahuShalum Clover_IceQueen YahuShalum Clover_IceQueen China is good financially, but environmentally and health-wise, I would not choose to live there. Plus they're commie scum bags with a one child policy. Yeah no thanks I love talking s**t about governments so I'd be imprisoned quickly there. >.< Is that how this is going to go down? The worse humanitarian rights governments will have the only jobs? Damn are we really that enslaved now? Personally, I don't like families with more than 5 kids. I know a family with 14 children. That's not healthy for the woman or the home. Can you imagine how crowded it is and how much it must cost to send all of those kids to school? No thanks. I'm sticking to 2 at the most xd I wouldn't say it's not healthy for the woman or home. I guess it really depends on the situations? I believe it's a personal choice but yeah there are situations that suggest the people shouldn't even have one child. >.< It's not healthy for the woman for horomonal reasons. Childbirth can really mess up a woman's mind. With 14 kids, I'd be surprised if she wasn't stuck in a permanent state of Postmortem Depression. That almost sounds like some Eugenics don't let them breed too much propaganda. All women will end up getting their hormonal imbalance in menopause anyways. I believe if there are any studies on it it would be truly inconclusive due to way too many varying factors. Humans don't fair too well in studies because of our diversity. Yes, but someone like me will probably die if I had that many children sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:16 pm
Clover_IceQueen YahuShalum Clover_IceQueen YahuShalum Clover_IceQueen Personally, I don't like families with more than 5 kids. I know a family with 14 children. That's not healthy for the woman or the home. Can you imagine how crowded it is and how much it must cost to send all of those kids to school? No thanks. I'm sticking to 2 at the most xd I wouldn't say it's not healthy for the woman or home. I guess it really depends on the situations? I believe it's a personal choice but yeah there are situations that suggest the people shouldn't even have one child. >.< It's not healthy for the woman for horomonal reasons. Childbirth can really mess up a woman's mind. With 14 kids, I'd be surprised if she wasn't stuck in a permanent state of Postmortem Depression. That almost sounds like some Eugenics don't let them breed too much propaganda. All women will end up getting their hormonal imbalance in menopause anyways. I believe if there are any studies on it it would be truly inconclusive due to way too many varying factors. Humans don't fair too well in studies because of our diversity. Yes, but someone like me will probably die if I had that many children sweatdrop >.< To each their own I reckon! As long as it doesn't effect me. >.<
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|