|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:07 am
Why don't we collectively write a bill to elliminate the federal reserve and mandate that the government shall be the only entity to make, distribute, and back a national currency?
http://pmc.princeton.edu/writeabill.php
http://www.sarasota.k12.fl.us/bhs/bryan/bryan_bill.html
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/7171854/How-to-Write-a-Congressional-Bill
If we collectively write a bill and share it with others to print it. We can spam our congress members with it. And even draw up media attention.
I can't do this alone.
Let's restart what Kennedy tried.
http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/executiveorder11110.htm
We write a comprehensive bill and get media attention. We can at least expose the nature of the federal reserve to the public even if the bill is shot down.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:21 am
I wonder if we could even twist our national debt to other countries into a debt that the federal reserve owe's and not our government. Take away the federal reserves power then throw it into the fire. Then again it's not my debt I just live here in America.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:53 am
I say we need to make BUS3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:00 pm
I have no idea what that is haha
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 4:28 pm
Azkeel I have no idea what that is haha Bank of the United States. You had BUS and BUS2 during the founding father years and it helped people get out of debt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:26 pm
Why not both? Destroy the Federal Reserve, destroy our government's debt to it so we can finally get some god given control over it, and end all these unneeded wars..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:22 pm
Better Idea: End The Fed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:09 pm
better yet call out the fiyat debt as we kill the root of money issue.
cant rebuild from nothing even the suzaku must destroy its own body to build a new one from the flames of its own burning flesh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:11 pm
maybe government officials hired oswald to kill kennedy but later he backed out and was framed for the assassination and maybe they knew he would tell the press the truth so maybe they hired ruby to kill oswald as well... maybe the government is hiding something... no, they are hiding EVERYTHING!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:14 pm
Well does anyone have an idea on what to do and how to start?
The government is the problem as well as the banks. I should call the government by it's proper name. A monopoly of violence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:43 pm
Writing a bill is probably the best idea I've seen in this guild to actually change anything. I have my doubts about it becoming law, but one step at a time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:45 pm
Oh I completly doubt it working; but perhaps it can really spread awareness?
The public can wonder why they shot it down. Expose the true corruption of American politics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:51 pm
I just thought of an idea on a new constitution. We write a constitution declairing the rights of the government not the people. Thus giving people the power of true freedom. We tell the government exactly what it's allowed to do and thus we can take away freedoms from the government rather then them taking our freedoms.
Like the American constitution declairs our rights as the people but the government manipulates the interpretation of our freedoms to take them away. Our freedoms should be seperate from the government. And laws shall not be enforced by the government but the people on a local level. But we have a set of rules defining our justice system. We will definetly need a well regulated judicial system and a lay out of how it would work.
Think of it as having a courthouse in every township. And we the people vote for the judges. And we bring our legal problems to the town's judicial system and have trials of peers. The judge would just be an over-seerer and have knowledge of the judicial regulations. And we can have votes to oust judge's whenever we have a majority that wishes it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:16 pm
Azkeel I just thought of an idea on a new constitution. We write a constitution declairing the rights of the government not the people. Thus giving people the power of true freedom. We tell the government exactly what it's allowed to do and thus we can take away freedoms from the government rather then them taking our freedoms. Like the American constitution declairs our rights as the people but the government manipulates the interpretation of our freedoms to take them away. Our freedoms should be seperate from the government. And laws shall not be enforced by the government but the people on a local level. But we have a set of rules defining our justice system. We will definetly need a well regulated judicial system and a lay out of how it would work. Think of it as having a courthouse in every township. And we the people vote for the judges. And we bring our legal problems to the town's judicial system and have trials of peers. The judge would just be an over-seerer and have knowledge of the judicial regulations. And we can have votes to oust judge's whenever we have a majority that wishes it. What you're talking about is a true democracy. The reason we don't have that is because it's too hard for every American to vote on every single issue that could affect them. That's why we have a representative democracy; it's more efficient. I think that true democracy would be better, but it's just not feasible as we'd spend all of our time voting on things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:23 pm
Obscurus Azkeel I just thought of an idea on a new constitution. We write a constitution declairing the rights of the government not the people. Thus giving people the power of true freedom. We tell the government exactly what it's allowed to do and thus we can take away freedoms from the government rather then them taking our freedoms. Like the American constitution declairs our rights as the people but the government manipulates the interpretation of our freedoms to take them away. Our freedoms should be seperate from the government. And laws shall not be enforced by the government but the people on a local level. But we have a set of rules defining our justice system. We will definetly need a well regulated judicial system and a lay out of how it would work. Think of it as having a courthouse in every township. And we the people vote for the judges. And we bring our legal problems to the town's judicial system and have trials of peers. The judge would just be an over-seerer and have knowledge of the judicial regulations. And we can have votes to oust judge's whenever we have a majority that wishes it. What you're talking about is a true democracy. The reason we don't have that is because it's too hard for every American to vote on every single issue that could affect them. That's why we have a representative democracy; it's more efficient. I think that true democracy would be better, but it's just not feasible as we'd spend all of our time voting on things. Well I figure we can even just get rid of a main government and just have a judicial system. (Very idealistic and impossible to create less we have a serious change) So a Judicial Anarchy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
