|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:13 pm
Because of the ******** Health Care bill, and we're gonna fall into a great depression, people still losing jobs, and riot. Which means INSTANT Police State.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 4:18 pm
added an excellent video series called Innocents Betrayed Gun Control History. Warning VERY GRAPHIC.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:28 pm
It's a good thing I follow martial traditions that don't rely on firearms. Blades don't run out of ammo. Guerrilla tactics never go out of style.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 2:28 pm
but if "they" are using guns... what good is a blade.. lol sweatdrop
that being said, i like blades much more too 3nodding the gun was one of the worst inventions ever sweatdrop I mean at least with a bow and arrow it requires skill whee Since I'm a MMORPG addict at heart I often think about ancient war with only hand held weapons. There could actually be "glory" in war like that, but there's no glory with guns xp
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 9:34 pm
A blade is no good head-on against a gun; see where I mention guerrilla tactics.
Guns require as much skill as blades, in my opinion. The difference is that guns are louder, have more moving parts, and run out of ammo. If I have to pick one, it's the blade.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:06 pm
actually its been proven that with skill (and an unearthly amount of timing) a traditional swords can cut through bullets and i am a mmo addict too i prefer swords as well and about the guns thing don't get modern and ancient guns confused old guns (one shot pistols and the like) were extremely hard and risky to use because of kickback and the one shot capabilities meant that guns had to be weighed with other options. (the main reason why ancient pirates used guns and swords)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:14 pm
Half of the problem is not just the government's actions but also the human mind. As long as people are still unstable and without good foundation, they will always be feeble in mind and spirit. You must educate the public on the importance of self control and self thought. You can't just force something down their throats.
Guns became their new devices of defense and attack, so now they are one of their main tools of survival.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:20 pm
guns became the main survival tool when they became the main killing tool just like the spear, then the sword, then Calvary, then the pike, then the bow and arrow, and now the gun, soon in the future possible mind powers or laser weapons. as long as weapons exist to kill we will need weapons to survive at least back in pre modern times when sword were common not everyone could use swords as efficiently as people can use guns or explosives today.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:31 pm
They should get rid of guns. I believe if someone really wants to kill someone and want them dead,they will atleast come up to them with a knife and probably have a chance of getting beat up by that person. Because guns r for cowards.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:39 pm
iQueenShippo They should get rid of guns. I believe if someone really wants to kill someone and want them dead,they will atleast come up to them with a knife and probably have a chance of getting beat up by that person. Because guns r for cowards. If there were absolutely no guns anywhere in the world and they were illegal to make, then yea.. that would be fantastic. But since the military will always have guns, civilians should NOT give up their guns.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 1:01 am
iQueenShippo They should get rid of guns. I believe if someone really wants to kill someone and want them dead,they will atleast come up to them with a knife and probably have a chance of getting beat up by that person. Because guns r for cowards. As a stalker, I shall say this, sir; if the guns were removed from the hands of everyone, criminals could easily obtain them by stealing them, thus increasing their ability to kick everyone without weaponry around. And if you want someone dead with a weapon, why give them a chance to attack? They'll most likely jam the weapon into the back of your skull via stealth methods, or tackle you to the ground and shove it into your neck. Sure, you'll fight back, but you're dead already due to that severed artery. The only truly glorious weapon is your fists. Those are the only weapons that never run out of ammunition, never dull, and never break...even if they're utterly reliant on how hard you can actually punch. Guns may be for cowards, but they get the job done a great deal cleaner. I'm watching you, you pussies.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 1:34 am
you know that the people what 13 people from the 3 states that were arrested with the ARs were just a way for Obama to say look we need to ban guns. it came out that 1 the did not make bombs the guy that works for the country that "infatuated them" made the bomb and they did not know how to bombs 2 they are republicans worked for the state and do search and rescue.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 8:14 pm
I honestly didn't expect this to turn into a "swords vs. guns" debate. As I said, both are equally useful and require equal skill. If you don't believe this then do some target practice with a modern firearm. It's not like an FPS. Each has its advantages and disadvantages. The same can be said of using the body as a weapon.
If you outlaw guns then only outlaws will have guns. I fully support the right to keep and bear arms, be they guns, knives, swords, crossbows, trebuchets... Whatever. Homemade bombs probably aren't a good idea though, as storing them would be hazardous to everyone.
@jin-soo kwon: I had the feeling that the militia arrests recently were a play to turn people against legitimate militias. Militias already get a bad name because everyone thinks they're just racists with guns; now if you add in that they're terrorists then no one will want to join.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:10 am
Banning guns? Hah. Come to South Dakota and you'll understand just how far trying to ban guns will get. Over fifty four percent of the population here, and as of today, me, own some type of firearms. Out of those fifty four percent, the vast majority owns more than one. One does not need a permit to own a rifle, can walk around downtown with it out, and can store it and any amount of ammo one wishes wherever the hell in their house they want. I just went out today with a few of my friends and we blew ten dollars worth of 7.62x54 shooting at targets out in the valley.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|