|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:28 pm
well i thought it important to post this here because i have met several people who say Question where in the Bible does it state the Earths age? Thats right Nowhere you cant Answer it Answer you would be right in saying that but we can put the pieces together, if we piece together the Birth Records and the timelines left for us we can give a correct assumption that the Earth is Roughly 6,000 years old why do i say this because age is the most important fact in this argument now if i was able to carbon date Adam i would which leads me to my next question question Carbon Dating techniques have come so far there's no way they can be wrong answer i,m afraid i have a counter Example for that you see Carbon Dating can only predict Thousands of Years not millions or billions For more information see ChristianAnswers.netnow that i hope I have gotten you on that one i have one last question to answer for you please remember these are questions my friends have asked me. Question how do you know how long one of Gods days was it could have been Billions of years for just one day answer 1. i cannot answer that one because i am not God but i can say this why would God who's Knowledge passes all understanding not write the Bible in a way we could understand it ponder that. Answer 2. Why would God take a billion years to create us he was not dumb he created life out of nothingness he would not take billions of years to do it now there are many acceptions to Evolution such as Micro-Evolution if you leave a Carnivore on a Island with plants and no other animals it will "Evolve" and learn to eat plants but Micro-Evolution is just mutations that occur and Micro-Evolution has Ocurred Before actualy in our lifetimes such as Insects developing a Resistance to Pesticides and Viruses like the H1N1 developing a resistance to the vaccine. feel free to post comments and debate in here.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:35 pm
micro-evolution=Small adaptations within a species
Macro-evolution=One species into another.
Micro evolution is a provable fact whereas Macro is something that cannot be retested it can only be assumed to. In other words Macro is not science at all, it is merely an ideal one can choose to take. (One that takes much more faith than I have to believe).
You ever heard of Natural Selection? Well its not like many make it seem, in all truthfulness many evolutionists give it more power than it actually has. Natural Selection is actually the removal of genes, not the addition, what evolution needs to be true is an addition, which one cannot find in natural selection since that is not what it does at all.
How about speciation? Think of the punnet square, not put a long haired dog and a short hair dog in a cold environment, which one will live and become more abundant in that environment? Of course the long haired one, the short haired ones will eventually freeze to death and die out. This is speciation. Again, it does not deal with the addition of genes, which is needed in evolution.
Now mutation. Mutation does deal with the addition! Is this a breakthrough? No, actually in the mutations we see, it is always a bad thing, that only causes an interference with the species. We have yet to see a good mutation, sure we have seen one which helps in certain circumstances, but what happens is they cannot or have trouble reproducing.
For more information just talk to me and I'll be willing to tell you what I know. (p.s. a good website I have found is www.answersingenesis.org.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:39 pm
Kain1334 Now mutation. Mutation does deal with the addition! Is this a breakthrough? No, actually in the mutations we see, it is always a bad thing, that only causes an interference with the species. We have yet to see a good mutation, sure we have seen one which helps in certain circumstances, but what happens is they cannot or have trouble reproducing. For more information just talk to me and I'll be willing to tell you what I know. (p.s. a good website I have found is www.answersingenesis.org.) sorry but there is a small flaw in your argument. There are mutations that have good effects. One such mutation is the gentic mutation that can cause sicle cell anemia (forgive me if I spelled it wrong.) If the genes combine corectly (50% chance) the child is born with natural immunities (can't quite remember the exact desease.) Of course on the other side of that there is the 25% chance that nothing happens and another 25% chance that they are born with sicle cell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 3:15 pm
Truith Kain1334 Now mutation. Mutation does deal with the addition! Is this a breakthrough? No, actually in the mutations we see, it is always a bad thing, that only causes an interference with the species. We have yet to see a good mutation, sure we have seen one which helps in certain circumstances, but what happens is they cannot or have trouble reproducing. For more information just talk to me and I'll be willing to tell you what I know. (p.s. a good website I have found is www.answersingenesis.org.) sorry but there is a small flaw in your argument. There are mutations that have good effects. One such mutation is the gentic mutation that can cause sicle cell anemia (forgive me if I spelled it wrong.) If the genes combine corectly (50% chance) the child is born with natural immunities (can't quite remember the exact desease.) Of course on the other side of that there is the 25% chance that nothing happens and another 25% chance that they are born with sicle cell. Oi but, that doesn't , mean they will continue in the family, it is a rare disorder like dwarfism and only happens a few times even when both parents have it. Sickle cell anemia is a genetic disease, not a mutation. And the affects of the immunities, also deals with genetic formation. It doesn't fit under mutations. Now you are right in that there is a possibility in positive mutations, but they are so rare, that it is almost non-existent. Not only that, but one has never been recorded to my knowledge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
