|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:08 pm
the image i see looks like Dorthy meets Daisy Duke
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:38 pm
Ooh.. I like the numeral edging. Interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:34 pm
Well, her wings may be steampunk-ish, but her undergarments certainly are not...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:16 pm
Not steampunk at all because ladies should not be showing themselves like that +gasp+.
All kidding aside though, the undergarments completely kill the look. That doesn't even match with the wings. The wings would be fine without the ivy and maybe different undergarments... THAT ARE NOT BLACK.... Because I'm tired of steampunk and black clothing constantly being paired in main stream society.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 12:54 pm
If they were selling those wings, I'd buy the hell out of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 6:44 pm
Seikuu-kun All kidding aside though, the undergarments completely kill the look. I agree! Off with the things!! xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 6:58 pm
StarScreame3r Seikuu-kun All kidding aside though, the undergarments completely kill the look. I agree! Off with the things!! xd You guys made my day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:48 pm
Booo! Slapping brown wings on a completely unrelated undergarment isn't steampunk. Even if they weren't going for steampunk they could have atleast made her "outfit" match. Try again Victoria's Secret.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 8:01 pm
Thani10 Booo! Slapping brown wings on a completely unrelated undergarment isn't steampunk. Even if they weren't going for steampunk they could have atleast made her "outfit" match. Try again Victoria's Secret. There are some more that are better, i'm gonna put more pics up in a sec..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 8:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 8:38 pm
Seikuu-kun- yuss! *adds to first post* ty!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 12:44 pm
Ahh, that's better. The new ones are wonderful. Way to represent victoria's secret.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 2:02 pm
Seikuu-kun Not steampunk at all because ladies should not be showing themselves like that +gasp+. All kidding aside though, the undergarments completely kill the look. That doesn't even match with the wings. The wings would be fine without the ivy and maybe different undergarments... THAT ARE NOT BLACK.... Because I'm tired of steampunk and black clothing constantly being paired in main stream society. Actually steampunk usually only deals with Victorian Aesthetics, not the morals, so being scanitly clad can still be considered steampunk. And nto all steampunk clothing is brown. I think that black is a nice neutral color for almost any style. It's close minded to think tha stemapunk is only brown and steampunk is about being open minded. Also, they're advertsing MODERN undergarments. As much as any money here can say we love corsets, we all prefer to wear a normal brassiere for comfort. I dont' see how pairing modern undergarments with the aesthetics of the fictional Victorian age isn't steampunk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<- Ty Seikuu-kun heart 
Reply
