Welcome to Gaia! ::

I believe in Evolution. Why?

Because there are millions upon millions upon millions of pieces of evidence supporting it. We see it happening. Take for a example, a horse.

A couple million years ago, the first horse was very small (under four feet), had a shorter snout, and it toes, not just hooves. We know this from skeletal remains that were found and dated using carbon dating.

Where are those horses now? If we say that they were created by God, then where are the remains from way back when of today's current horses?

Animals evolve constantly, right before our eyes. If they do not adapt to a changing environment, they die. Those animals that do adapt carry their adaptions onto offspring, who carry it down to their own.

I'm fundamentally a scientist. Contrary to popular belief, this does not mean that I follow the scientific explanation. I look at the evidence, I look at the theory, and I agree, amend, or come up with my own damn version of things.

In this case, the fundamental parts of evolution are proven beyond reasonable doubt. And for the sake of debate, I'll elaborate here on those. The basis of evolution is two simple, and easily testable postulates.

1) That a species will change over time. This one has been observed countless times. A second requirement of this postulate is that a species can develop an entirely new trait. Again, this has been shown in an experiment recently with E-Coli bacteria. (I forget the precise experiment though).

2) That sufficient genetic change renders two animals incapable of breeding to produce fertile young. This is the specialisation condition, and is shown through simple logic to work at an extreme level.

Humans (for example) have 23 chromosome pairs, and need all (most, see Downs Syndrome and related disorders) of them to survive. Thus, a species such as a Cat, with 17 pairs, cannot pair up with the 23 of a human to create a working species.

This, in conjunction with the cats size, is what prevents the interbreeding of human and feline (unfortunate statement, given my cat ears, I suppose).

Given that it works in the extreme case, we can deduce that there is a limit where it will occur that is more reasonable. Of course, even our closest ancestor, evolutionarily speaking, has 24 pairs to our 23.

With these two postulates proven and testable, all that remains standing in the way of Evolution being embraced with open arms is a) Religion and b) relative rates of mutation, creating a reasonable timeline for mutation between abiogenesis and present day.

But yes, evolution ftw.

I'd wager that most z!CBers will accept Evolution.

Regarding your question though... yes, humans are still evolving. There are still humans that breed more often than others.

Natural Selection has gotten a great deal more clouded though, thanks to the inclusion of infertility causing environs (nuclear plants, kitchens etc..) and the addition of contraceptives.

The general view is that humanity will diverge into two subspecies. An intelligent attractive ruling class, and a slave class that have none of the above traits.

However, that's a fantasy. The reality is, that the stupid class will be the ruling class, because they'll be more populous, and more prone to violence.

Evolution is still happening - because we keep reproducing and those random genetics keep popping up. Does it "matter" though? That's a harder one.
...
...
I'd say we've gotten so good at keeping everyone alive that currently we won't see much effect from evolution. It'll still happen, but in so many ways at once that it'll be hard to distinguish any of them. The first time a major die off happens though, the people who've evolved the right traits to survive it will be immediately obvious.

I know strongest isn't the fittest
It's an easy example that is obvious

And, i agree. As long as we're animals, we'll still pass on traits, having people more suspect to sunburns, for example, or more fit for heat or cold.

Actually, your parents are more monkey than they are anything else
The genome is the similar, and you can successfully make the argument that you're more similar to a monkey than your own sister.
Unfortunately, people find this offending, because of our own inflated egos. I mean, we put ourselves as gods, and the center of the universe
How much more ego can you get?

Also, if you use complex examples, people will just say, "WUHH?? Simplify please"

Evolution is only seldom taught properly in schools, especially on a State by State basis.

I had a professor last semester who did an amazing job explaining the whole debate, and how much of it is real science.... ect.... as well as the evidence for evolution that is usually misconstrued to mean various things having to do with eugenics.