|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 7:16 am
*shudders*
Known affectionatly to me and my friends as 'Music for people who dont know how to play'
Thoughts?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 2:36 pm
I dont think all of Modern Jazz is spastic it's pretty much Modal. If you wanna think spastic think Ornette Coleman it's the free jazz aspect of it that makes it unique.
Alot of what made John Coltrane famous was modern jazz like Giant Steps and A Love Supreme.
The group that recorded Kind of Blue Cannonball Adderley, John Coltrane, Wynton Kelly Bill Evans, Paul Chambers and Jimmy Cobb were playing modern jazz.
So i dont hate it and i dont think it's too random even the atonal stuff is cool to me. Mingus did alot of that stuff just like Ornette Coleman.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fashionable Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 9:23 pm
I wasnt offended i was just trying to check to see that your definition of modern jazz was the same as mine. It sounded that your idea of it was free jazz.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fashionable Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:08 pm
Oh ok. Yeah that sounds about right. I'm talking about random notes at random times, with every instrument playing a different key etc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 12:41 pm
Ninja_mule *shudders* Known affectionatly to me and my friends as 'Music for people who dont know how to play' Thoughts? Who, or what would you refer to as "modern jazz?" Joshua Redman? Branford Marsallis? Walter Smith? Dave Holland?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 1:07 pm
Not being a big fan of it, I have tried to avoid it.... so I dont know who any of those poeple are... sweatdrop
I'll look them up tonight
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 2:32 am
The old school stuff is always the best. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 4:46 pm
t0paz The old school stuff is always the best. 3nodding Amen to that! mrgreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 2:20 pm
t0paz The old school stuff is always the best. 3nodding Eh, matter of opinon, not fact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:28 am
King_of_ninjas Oh ok. Yeah that sounds about right. I'm talking about random notes at random times, with every instrument playing a different key etc It makes me cringe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:34 pm
I like it...
different keys...atonal...spastic...whatever you want to call it, I enjoy it.
silly traditionalists wink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:18 pm
kila_chan I like it... different keys...atonal...spastic...whatever you want to call it, I enjoy it. silly traditionalists wink i agree! i agree! =] 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 6:37 am
Well, as for me, I like modern "classical" music (non jazz) I haven't heard much modern jazz, but the ones I have heard are pretty good. I've even composed a modern classical piece of my own! It's pretty interesting, you should hear it! domokun I've said before that more electronics should be incorporated into jazz because then you can accomplish the otherwise impossible. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 10:04 pm
Eh, sorry. I consider myself a modern jazz player in all aspects (yes I do free jazz among other things), so I really have a biased opinion on this. But, modern jazz is not spastic, and furthermore, you need to define what you MEAN by modern jazz exactly. We could call any number of things modern jazz, from the guys Saur mentioned to people like Dave Douglas. It's too broad to make a generalization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
