|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 1:47 pm
So, should we keep the current rule about inactivity so that only those who care about the guild are in our ranks; or let their lifeless bodies inflate the numbers to coax more people to join, hopefully to become new actives?
Discuss
Decide before May 1st (next Friday). Change the future of the Guild!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 1:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
How could you let the inactive people decide if the rule is there.
1. There not active so what do they care?
2. They're going to defend themselves and vote to get rid of the rule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 11:09 am
lol, I know. I just wanted a third option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 8:28 am
I think we should just ask the inactive weather they want to stay or not. I'm sure if you pm'd them telling them that they haven't been posting and have become inactive, they can have the choice to come back and post, or not come back and get kicked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 4:55 pm
*lites fire under thred* >.>
most have a reazon thay should at lest tell whats going on before leaving for how ever long thay will be. Most luse intrest *slaps my hand* . . .
yes im bad my self but at lest im trying ^~^
you cant pleaz all the furrs all the time, just some of the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 8:36 pm
Personally I think they should be banned, let the guild consist of only those who care. Those who are banned, if they really want to be back then they know who to contact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
