|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 4:52 pm
ok, so someone told me that the talking boards for pendulums we sell at work are wrong. the set up is like this (it's in the shape of a rectangle, this is just the basic layout):
rephrase - no - maybe yes - *blank* - yes try again - no - will not answer
so how are they supposed to be laid-out? i, personally, see nothing wrong with this.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
also, it seems that everyone that uses the pendulums thinks that it is set in it's directional answering (clockwise=yes, counter=no), but i though that they are supposed to answer you based on your inner vibrations and the "standard" would not work for everyone, hence the reason for programming. am i mistaken or does no one research anything anymore?
i'm just trying to learn all i can because soon we will have a spiritual section that is separate from the rest of the store and i will be working in that area most of the time. i don't want to tell any customers (or co-workers for that matter) the wrong thing, ya know.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:47 pm
I'm not 100% sure but I don't think it matters how they're laid out as long as it works with you - because even then, the pendulum would need to be programmed so it would know what each space meant. o.o
----
I generally program my pendulum anyways to see which direction it swings (or how it swings, circle or straight) for yes and no. I do believe that the "standard" doesn't work for everyone considering everyone works a little differently - as you've said xD.
heart
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 7:04 pm
Considering that you can use a pendulum without any type of board as long as you lay out what "yes" and "no" are in advance, I don't really see what the problem would be.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:40 pm
I don't think there is a "correct" way. I never used boards. In my experience, people develop systems with pendulems on their own. However, I can see where a board would help with concentration.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|