|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 6:03 pm
Haven't posted in a while blah blah let's stir things up a little. Quick and to the point:
1. List your opinion on death and the afterlife, if any. 2. If we could achieve immortality through scientific accomplishment, how would you react?
Other death-related off-topic discussion is fine, just try not to depress us all somehow, haha...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 7:52 am
1.) I think when we die our souls must vacate our bodies as they can no longer support the soul or any other spark of life. In this case, the soul passes on, sometimes becoming a ghost trapped within the ether directly related with earth, and sometimes becoming a spirit in some sort of afterlife harmonic place. In this place the soul can then choose to reincarnate, though some specific souls are not given a choice and must reincarnate to either perform penance, learn new lessons, or perform some task. In a purely non-physical form I believe that time is irrelevant, and therefore the individual may incarnate at any time, place, or space so long as there is a physical body available.
2.) Bah. Who wants to be immortal? Certainly not me, that'd be boring as hell after the first hundred or two years.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 8:08 am
1) In a sense, reincarnation is a scientific fact. When we die, our bodies decompose and every little physical atom that made them up becomes part of something else (or more likely, many something-elses). This process is utterly inseparable from what we call birth/creation. There is never creation without destruction; put another way, nothing is 'gained' without a 'loss.' All death and birth are is transformations which always occur in tandem. This too is fact, though the interpretation I swing on it becomes somewhat philosophical. I doubt that if the so-called 'soul' exists that its process is any different at its core; the only difference may be that transformations operate at an accelerated or decelerated rate compared to something else. If there is one universal truth, one universal constant, that is change. Everything changes. Without exception.
2) Whenever people speak of immortality, I just laugh in amusement. For one, we already have immortality through the above cycle of eternal change and transformation. That basic stuff floating around and going through transformations is in some sense immortal; the stuff it arranges itself to make is not. It's that immortality we want, though. Which is incredibly naive and foolish on oh so many levels. First, it's plainly impossible as it's the equivalent of demanding the universe stop changing. Second, even if it were hypothetically possible it would be incredibly undesirable as your current self could never change from what it is now. You could not think. You could not eat. You could not move or breathe.
Quaintly, I imagine the experience of being immortally unchanging would be rather similar to what we fear death would be like. Empty and utterly meaningless. Regardless of what you believe the meaning of life is, in some way that meaning stems from change.
Human beings can be such control freaks sometimes. Sometimes I don't understand why more of them don't sit back, awe at the marvel that is our ever-changing universe, and ride the waves it carries them on. If they spent less time putting conditional value statements on their existences (such as 'my life would be better if it was longer') and just started appreciating what they have right now, they'd be far better off in the happiness department.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 8:38 am
List your opinion on death and the afterlife, if any. My opinion changes a lot (which I guess is a good thing, in a way) but most of the time I veer towards "when you're gone, you're gone".
If we could achieve immortality through scientific accomplishment, how would you react? I'm unabashedly excited at the idea of immortality; other people may think that it'd get boring after a while, which I think is kind of ridiculous - I mean, history's full of events that would've been awesome (in its older sense of something to be in awe of) to witness. Who says the future will be any less boring? I know I'd like to live without the fear of death.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 3:08 pm
my opinion, there are one of two things after you die.
A) theres nothing, you just cease to exist without a functioning body
B) there are indeed souls and you go to either toe astral plains to better yourself for eternity, or you just haunt earth and star on those dumb shows like ghost hunters and haunting.
if we could achieve immortality through scientific accomplishment, i would likely s**t my pants and go play real life halo3 for the rest of my life, working 12 hours a day towards halo3, 12 hours a day towards complete psionic enlightenment and mastering telekinesis. i would LOVE to be immortal.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 9:21 am
1.) I think after ours souls leave our body, they go to an afterlife place to reincarnate into another form. In this place, you can basically choose which body you would like to reincarnate into, but for some that option isn't available, because some souls need to be taught lessons. When it boils down to it, it's karma at it's highest. My opinion on death is a bit mixed.... You'll never be yourself again, but at the same time, you experience life again. It's kind of sad when you think about it.
2.) If we could achieve immortality..... It'd be interesting to say the least. I suppose after I read every book out there, I'd eventually go insane, or commit suicide out of severe boredome. There just wouldn't be that much to do after the first couple hundred years.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 7:40 pm
[Coldplay]Where do we go? Nobody knows [/Coldplay] But if I were to gander a guess, I'd guess that we make our own afterlife. Kinda like in the movie "What Dreams May Come". Or it could be absolutely nothing and the joke's on us. Immortality? Wouldn't be opposed to it. Then death would become voluntary.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:00 pm
This is weird. Heh. I started to write a sotry that started out with death.
What a coincidense.
I believe when I die that I'll uhh... return to whence I came.
Or turn in to a BEEE-UUU-TI-FUL star. ;D
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 4:58 am
If I was going for Occam's razor, I'd have to say it's probably we become nothing and walk gently into oblivion. However, I've always been inclined to mistrust it in matters of grey areas such as this. So I really have no idea. The idea of oblivion no longer bothers me, but my ideas to what may happen is that I may be judged by the old gods in the old ways. I may even be judged by the newer god closest to my heart. Or I might instead leave my body like an extra shell, attain my spiritual/astral/what the ******** ever form, put on the mantle of my titles and honors and get to work messing around the universe. Perhaps any combination of these things.
I think a lot of people would say yes to immortality because they are very afraid of dying. Some see it as power. And some just want to continue on this earth for a while longer than usual. I might consider doing such a thing as long as it's not retarded or evil or kills 100 towns to make a Philosopher's Stone or something ghasty and stupid like that. As for the idea in general, it might be a good one. We could bring back monarchy, if you could find someone you can trust. The idea of all governments is in some way to get good people in the position to do good things for other people. That is the goal behind all government philophies, or lack of government philosophies. Democracy is supposed to use the wisdom of the mob to weed those who would misuse power, so that only those found worthy by all could rule. That's not really how it works today. If you could get one, completely honest, genuinely good person and put him on a throne, and told him "Take care of this country," it would be a lot different. That goodness would never go away. I mean, imagine America if George Washington had never died, and had kept the real true spirit of the Founding Fathers around. But then again, it'd be one super hell of a time finding yourself the good guy and getting to trust him enough for that, which is theoretically infinite trust. But yeah, my cents.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 1:25 pm
I've had far too many conversations with dead people not to believe in an afterlife, and if conversations with entities during shamanic journeying could *ever* be considered evidence and not fluffy flimflam, it's rather interesting. Of course, I also believe in reincarnation, and that it's a rather complicated learning process. Which is to say, we in fact choose most of the major building blocks of our lives in advance, for the sake of learning something (and hopefully actually learn the first time, as repeats suck).
As for immortality...good lord, I just finished reading Heinlein's "Time Enough for Love". How timely. Essentially, I don't think that indefinite life is good for everyone, and quite frankly the people who would most like it are also those least likely to do anything worthwhile with it, and in fact might do something awful. It's that whole "people so rarely wish for what would really be best for them" argument all over again. Now, to be fair, I've been scared spitless of dying for the last year or so (I'm working on getting past that). Would I be rabidly excited by the prospect of extended life? Yeah, probably, but also probably suspicious. Would I be deeply suspicious and reluctant if it was billed as "immortality"? OH HELLS YES. It's odd, but while 200 years of life sounds like a possibly-neat idea to me, eternal life is not so attractive. And then there's the whole "quality of life" deal...
I look at it like this: women are supposed to have periods, and none of us particularly enjoys the process, but there are a lot of long-term health problems associated with those wonderful drugs that "get rid of" periods. All humans are supposed to die, and most people really don't seem to enjoy it (though we do have one overheard conversation to the contrary), but by extension I figure the price of evading that is bound to be higher than I'm willing to pay.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:32 pm
1) When people die if they want to they can choose to rencarnate, or not. They can become sprit garudians too if they want...I think?
2) There is a reason why we arent immortal in the first place, and since that is how life is I wouldnt want to be immortal anyway.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 4:30 pm
I think people who say they are not afraid of death are ignorant to how beautiful life can be. I used to say I wasn't afraid of death until I realized I was lying.... because I was afraid I've always been afraid of the dark ^_^ and so I realized that even though I'm not afraid of the actual happening of my death... I still value the ending of my life.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 9:37 pm
cheerios18 I think people who say they are not afraid of death are ignorant to how beautiful life can be. I used to say I wasn't afraid of death until I realized I was lying.... because I was afraid I've always been afraid of the dark ^_^ and so I realized that even though I'm not afraid of the actual happening of my death... I still value the ending of my life. Most of us realize how beautiful life is. I personally believe one should not experience the Ecstasy of living, if they can not see death without fear. Being fearful of death cheapens life as well. That is just me, my goal since I was 9 is to reach out and grab risks, and I can't do that if im afraid up to a gun.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:39 pm
yeah I was just thinking that like none of can truly say we aren't afraid of dying cause that's a pathetic lie, if we weren't afraid of dying we'd be off jumping off cliffs and seizing the day, not wasting our days at the computer. no excuses...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|