|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 12:48 pm
Yuko Yamiyama This is Nyed's post. Chiku votes a nay. Nyed Yuko Yamiyama Nyed Hmm....alright, what do you think is the difference between art and porn? mad Well that requires me to think It depends on the viewer of the art, on what is tabu and what is accepitable. Personally, I have no hang ups and are not all offended by anything. (Well thats a lie, utter rudeness offends me.) But things like, ********, giving head and a**l would be considered porn becuse its offfensive to peoples religions, or morals, but depending on how its depicted it can be "art". I'm reminded of Tom of Finland and his hyper-males depicted in his "art"..... stressed Im rambleing! *punches self in face* Porn is: anything you wouldnt show to your kids. Art is:Something you would encourage a kid to look at and form an oppion on. Hmm...what about movies like 8 1/2 Weeks and Brokeback Mountain? What about them? I havent a clue what 8 1/2 weeks is about, Ive never heard of it before. But thats typical of me. I chase over hard to find, old movies and totally ignore what movies are showing currently. Brokeback Mountain is from what I hear, is about gay cowboys. Which to me lacks any conversay becuse its most likey historaly accuret. Nothing but cattle and other men around, Im sure some feelings and attracts would occure. It depresses me a little becuse I seem to have a small fedish for Cowboys, blue hair'd cowboys. Do let me know if you see any, becuse Im not willing to shair the world's rare blue hair'd cowboy with any gay men. Even though I'm sure Koi intended to extend this interview, I personally think the interview to this level is adequate for showing her intellectual qualities.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 6:50 pm
Lord Vyce Yuko Yamiyama This is Nyed's post. Chiku votes a nay. Nyed Yuko Yamiyama Nyed Hmm....alright, what do you think is the difference between art and porn? mad Well that requires me to think It depends on the viewer of the art, on what is tabu and what is accepitable. Personally, I have no hang ups and are not all offended by anything. (Well thats a lie, utter rudeness offends me.) But things like, ********, giving head and a**l would be considered porn becuse its offfensive to peoples religions, or morals, but depending on how its depicted it can be "art". I'm reminded of Tom of Finland and his hyper-males depicted in his "art"..... stressed Im rambleing! *punches self in face* Porn is: anything you wouldnt show to your kids. Art is:Something you would encourage a kid to look at and form an oppion on. Hmm...what about movies like 8 1/2 Weeks and Brokeback Mountain? What about them? I havent a clue what 8 1/2 weeks is about, Ive never heard of it before. But thats typical of me. I chase over hard to find, old movies and totally ignore what movies are showing currently. Brokeback Mountain is from what I hear, is about gay cowboys. Which to me lacks any conversay becuse its most likey historaly accuret. Nothing but cattle and other men around, Im sure some feelings and attracts would occure. It depresses me a little becuse I seem to have a small fedish for Cowboys, blue hair'd cowboys. Do let me know if you see any, becuse Im not willing to shair the world's rare blue hair'd cowboy with any gay men. Even though I'm sure Koi intended to extend this interview, I personally think the interview to this level is adequate for showing her intellectual qualities. Personally, I vote Nay on Nyed. The user cannot spell very well, has a hard time grasping the concepts presented, and didn't really seem to care all that much about joining (through the casual way of writing/high amount of spelling/grammar errors and a bunch of generalizations of material, causing her to go off- topic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 4:25 am
I'm changing my vote on Nyed to Nay. I don't know what I was thinking, really. Blue haired cowboys? WTF?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 9:52 am
Here's Magnificient's interview. I think overall, I'd give him a yay. Magnificient chikushou Magnificient chikushou Magnificient . . .mentally disabled kids? Yes, what about them? In all the schools that I have ever been to, we've always had a second program for them. That doesn't meen they don't feel accepted though, this year our sophomore Mr. Frost (winter homecoming prince-type thing) was autistic. How does that relate to them feeling inadequate on account of seeing the honor roll? . . . damn, that doesn't does it? I'm sorry. I was just trying to get the point across that I don't fully know the entire scenario, considering I have never been in a school that puts kids, who don't belong on the same level, on the same level. On the main subject, I don't think it is the children that feel inadequate with what they achieve; I believe it is more what the parents are trying to force their children to do even though they might not be able to achieve that. That goes not only for mentally disabled, but fully healthy children who aren't able to achieve their parents striving goals as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:59 pm
Judging from the bits I've read in here, I would have to vote "nay" on Nyed. They seem to hop around a bit on their topic. There is a difference between randomness and indifference, and they seem to follo through with the latter. If they put a little more effort into their grammar and spelling, I might have considered a "yay", but a true desire to be an intellectual pervert just isn't there...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:03 pm
Oh, and I'm thinking about a yay on Magnificient, but I was wondering if you could post more if the interview, Chiku-san?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 12:38 am
Still being new, I don't know how much my opinion here will matter, but I say yay for Magnificient...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 3:54 am
Magnificent has my approval. But the rest of the interview (if it's there) would be nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 6:53 am
Er, sorry. I didn't realize the beginning of it was deleted. Here it is: Magnificient chikushou Magnificient chikushou Although you specified an IM address, I was wondering if it would be easier for you to do an interview via PM, assuming you have not already been contacted by another mod. either would be fine, thanks smile . Okay, cool. I'll conduct this via PMs, then. In some schools, the Honor Roll has been eliminated because parents complain that the students who do not make the honor roll feel inadequate. Is this justified? I believe it is, considering (in our school at least) there is a limited number of spots within the honor roll. They go with the 4.0, understandable, but we only have 10-20 from each grade that is accepted so after the the GPA is taken into consideration they go alphabetically. Knowing that it gives anyone after the letter M starting their last name (this includes me mad ) the school still goes on without changing their selection process. Magnificient chikushou Magnificient chikushou What about in the cases where there is no number limit to the people on an honor roll, but anyone who shows achievement in their classes is put on the honor roll? that's when I tell te parents to quit whining about their kids being stupid and tell them to get better grades (the kids not the parents) What about the kids who are impaired in that regard, and cannot do much better in school than they already do? What if they consistantly feel generally inadequate because they always have to see all the achievements that other people make, and are not able to achieve the same thing, regardless of their effort? . . .mentally disabled kids?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:42 am
[ Message temporarily off-line ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 12:07 pm
s**t. Wow, they're so to the point. I completely agree. *Still a little bit in shock*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 11:36 am
Yay, from me, I guess.
Though, I'm wondering if, because of the overwhelming percentage of people who request interviews, we should just make interviews the standard, and say that the people must PM Yuko for interview assignments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 1:46 pm
The Vagabond on the Info superhighway agrees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:32 pm
This in from Yuko: Yuko Yamiyama Kailgrim Yuko Yamiyama Kailgrim The subject I have selected is gay marriage/gay relashionships. My personal feelings are thesse, If a hetrosexual male can marrie a hooker in vegas in a mock church then why can't gay males or females who seriously love each other, I think all marriage should be based on love, then they can marry all they want. Just because their homosexual doesn't mean you have a right to treat them poorly, and yes I agree that from a religious stand point it is inappropriate but if you realy get technical I think you would be forgiven anyway and as constitutional law states you have the right to the pursuit of happieness and homosexuals are people too and still deserve their rights. Alright, so why do you think they would be so againest it? Probably because of several reasons like, for starters, It isn't traditonal it is frowned apon in many religeons it goes against the natural order, basicaly closed mindedness, I myself am not homosexual but I can't judge them, thats not my place and I'm not them or god, besides I think if they want to live in that way they have the right to even if I personaly think it's not the right choice. Hmm...what do you think should be the natural order of things? What defines natural? Kailgrim Yuko Yamiyama Kailgrim Yuko Yamiyama Kailgrim Well not to be Darwinistic, (because I dissagree with evolution) but nature is about survival, your survival your familys survival and your race's survival, a large part of that is reproduction and homosexualatiy prevents that and yes we should have higer goals than reproduction, despite the umm {cough} recreational and enjoyable parts, those higher goals of helping people and bettering man kind are still centered around life and survival. Of course you could say their also based around morality, another thing that is considered to be against "gays", but the basis behind morality is to protect humans to have an easier and safer time while living, again about surrvival. May I ask why you disagree with evolution? Of course! I'd be happy to share my views with you and other inteligent people, thats why I want into this guild, back to the subject. I dissagree with evolution because it is based on the theory of the big bang which in it's self goes against millions of other proven princeples and It is not only dissproven for a religious person it is also disproven by statistics and science the possibillitys of a random creation of matter and then inteligent life being created on that plant and the correct conditions to sustain said life are a almost 100 trillion to 1, and according to the proven facts of matter that matter cannot be created or destoyed only altered and that goes against the big bang and that goes against evolution. Many people theorize that the big bang was, in fact, not the start of the universe, but merely part of a cycle. It's a theory that the universe expands, then contracts, and explodes, and the universe is reformed. It's part of the theory of the infinite universe. It is, in fact, not so self-contradictory. In addition, because of fact that evolution would have to be so gradual that it could never be directly observed within one lifetime, and that the world could have been around long enough to have the start of multiple possible lives, it seems to me to still be valid. Anyways, even though you disagree with evolution and Darwinism, do you believe it should still be taught? Well I still look at basic genetics and laws of phisics as more valid than the idea of an expanding and contracting universe, I mean first of all what makes it contract? expansion has been seen in nebulas but the closest thing to contractions a black hole but where would this matter go? How does it get back? Not that it's impossible but I'm still skeptic, and yes you could say critizism and skeptisism don't help but if it weren't for speculations and skeptisism of ideas we would still think the world was flat and the center of the universe. I suppose evolution makes sense because of changes over time but that could be seen as simple genetic mutation and progression through popular genes within each generation. My Final point is even if we weren't purposfuly created everything from the stars and nebulas to dirt and grass had to have come from a higher power some how. It's the only fufilling explenation because science can't explain it all. Chiku votes yay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:34 pm
This is also a partially done interview on Yuko's account. I think, though, that because of the way it is going, it can be judged at this level. So, should it be continued, or just judged as it is now? nasser4 Yuko Yamiyama nasser4 Yuko Yamiyama nasser4 i personaly hate the hell out of it, i think it should be illegal unless youve been raped Can you please give me more of an argument than that? ok, I think that people should vote abortion illeagal unless you've been raped because if u have a baby then it is a human being like me or u so they should love that baby no matter what happend and mabye that baby will bring u great fortune But there are many other situations than that. There are times when pregnancy could cause the death of the mother. Besides, the life of a human being like me or you is not directly dependant on someone else. If, right now, any other person were to die right now, it would not cause an abrupt end to your life or mine. But if a mother carrying a child were to suddenly die, right now, it would cause the death of the fetus. Can we really count the fetus as a live human being, just like someone who has already been born? i personally say yes u do count him/her because they still lived and had a heart that beated right? so u should them
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
