|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:59 pm
If you roleplay on a global scale, you face global issues.
Mutual consent does not apply in war.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 4:15 pm
Ryugi Kazamaru *Dissects* The guild is categorized as a battle guild, yes, but that isn't its soul purpose, and you know it as well as I do. If all this guild was was a fighting arena, there'd be an arena, possibly a few other locations to fight in, and a large OOC thread. We don't have that. We have an entire WORLD to ROLEPLAY in. There aren't many people in Levi that do nothing but fight, and regular roleplaying makes up a large majority of IC actions. We might be LISTED as a battle guild, but we much much more than that. You insult me, the ministration of armies is just as much RP as whatever emotional gobledygook you wish to be involved in. I'm not downing what you like, because I've done the emotional gobledy gook line myself, and that can be fun too. But Roleplaying an entire nation properly and a military force properly is hard work, and it is very much ROLEPLAY. Quote: This is a completely different issue. I've had warning, I know its coming, as do most people in the guild. One issue I have with the past invasions and subsequent attacks on my city is that no one bothered to tell me I was included in their plans. I would generally assume that was common courtesy. I've seen no real mention of this army being drafted, or marching anywhere other than popping up in my thread and taking an attacking formation. In most battle situations here, people challenge one another to a fight and get their permission before simply duking it out with one another. I don't think this army situation should be any different. Something the powers that be might jot down for future reference. Should I link you to what I wrote in the West Fall thread? Also, the whole thing about conflict I stated about conflict with Damien. ANd, I haven't touched your city and I'm effectively asking, almost begging, you for permission now. Is that good enough. When you started contracting with R.I. I considered it a done deal that you knew there would be problems with West Fall, I didn't think I had to tell you exactly everything you were doing. I read in your thread anything pertaining to your actions, I assumed you kept track of what I was doing in mine. When the army started preapaing, MONTHS AGO, I thought you would notice. Perhaps I presumed too much. Quote: Actually, first and foremost, I think this is a place for people to have fun and enjoy themselves while interacting with others online. I think that this concept has been lost somewhere over the last year or so, and I think it needs to be brought back. The reason I said selfish, is because you're thinking about what you want to happen, rather than considering what the people directly involved might want to happen. As Josh said, "several (read: SEVERAL) people" have voiced complaints about this army attacking the city. I'm not alone. I'm not the only one with an issue here. If I HAD been, then I'm pretty sure the mods would NOT have gotten involved as much as they have over the past few days. They would have told MerDerf and I to settle it between ourselves and to "not drag these issues into the OOC Thread." Also, I'm fighting for the people that have voiced their problems with this army attacking my city. You see, I know how irritating, upsetting, and angering it is to have your RPing fun ruined by someone marching an army into the situation. It isn't a fun thing to deal with, and because of that knowledge, I'm fighting to keep that upsetting experience from them. You're hiding behind your friends to get your own way. That's how I see it. Fighting for the people in your thread is a joke, you're just as selfish as I am in your motives. At least you could admit that. Quote: Not everyone is so willing to rush headlong into an army. This comment proves my point about the unfair statement. It is unfair to simply tell a person, "don't like it? Then ******** off and deal with it." when all they're trying to do is have a good time with someone else. The people in my thread were not fighting. They were role playing. They did not make attempts to attack one another, and showed no willingness to do so. When someone can easily avoid the whole confrontation by going around the city and not interrupting anyone's roleplaying activities, I don't see why you think it is right or correct to disregard what the majority wants to do, in favor of a single person's agenda. It doesn't make sense, and is completely unfair. FIghting is roleplaying. You have no right to say that battle and war do not count as an integral, if not VITAL, portion of roleplay. Quote: The conflict of interest comes from one person wanting to do one thing, and a group of other people wanting to do another. As you stated earlier, who are you to tell people they can't do this and that when they came here to find fun in the first place? In this particular situation, more than two people are involved in the conflict, and the means to avoid the conflict doesn't really hinder the penultimate goal of the attacking party. As a moderator, one should see that the conflict should be settled in favor of the majority, simply because of the ease to which the problem can be solved without creating a massive hassle for the single attacking party. So you're saying if we are infiltrated by an influx of tea party roleplayers and they become the majority then Leviathan should change to a tea party guild?Quote: Quite frankly, if I had had some semblance of warning, and the player of the army in question had bothered to tell me what was going on, I would have been far more open to an attack on my city, or even allowing some sort of RPing situation to arise between the army and my city. Once more, the last time I checked, most fights in here take place after both sides have agreed to fight. And, again, as I said before, I don't think this type of situation should be any different. Bullshit, I've been writing out this scenario for how long. You were dealing with R.I. precisely because you had been warned and were taking measures to upgrade your military. Did I have to send you a PM asking for your express permission to assualt Lament and reserve a special date and time? I don't agree that both sides have to agree to fight all the time either, and I already explained why in another post. I've made my most recent arguments, if you chose to forbid me, I chose to challenge to you to a one-on-one against Red in Levi Stadium, HoH style as far weapons rules go. I still have my acceptable profile somewhere. If you want, we can go no weapons or magic, I don't care that much. If you accept at least that, I may keep some degree of respect for you.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 4:25 pm
Vahn Kyonuske We will be working on something so that this doesn't happen again in the future. As it is, there is nothing that the crew will do at this point and time. IC interaction has already started between army and city anyway, so the entire reason for this being brought up in the first place is moot. In the future, apparently it will be necessary to knock on someones door first before barging in and shooting up the place. Leviathan Tea Party.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 4:49 pm
MerDerf, look.
I am not forbidding ANYONE from roleplaying in Lament. As I said, I created the thread so people would have a fun and interesting roleplaying environment. I did not say you couldn't roleplay there, I simply wanted to avoid an army vs army conflict. Until you showed up in my thread, I had no idea you were raising an army to attack me. Until you mentioned it, I had no knowledge that Raven Industries was an enemy of West Fall.
When I had Lament contract with Raven Industries, all I had in mind was giving Lament an upgrade, both in weapons, and in living spaces. I didn't know I was picking a side in a war or whatever. Lament's stance has always been neutral, until the undead attacked, now they are highly opposed to undead. Lament, as well as myself, has no interest in making enemies of anyone. They would much rather make friends, and allies.
I did say please when I asked you to go around and not attack the city. I did not demand that you turn around and go home. I wanted a compromise that might work for both of us.
If you would rather not compromise, then I can accept your other fight challenge. However, I can only use Ryugi if the fight is non-cannon, as he is currently out of commission due to some other actions that took place elsewhere. I DO have one character left, but I've never used him before. So, the choice is up to you.
Compromise and try to find a common ground.
or
Fight in the stadium with one of the characters.
|
 |
 |
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 5:42 pm
As the rules have been brought in once, I will bring it in again. As it stands under the Way of the Leviathan the rules read as follows. Way of the Leviathan GeneralOnly make meaningful replies. Useless comments will be deleted. Trolls will result in banning. Don't like the roleplaying? Ignore it, or report it if it breaks the rules. We the moderating staff are currently debating the exact meaning of that statement and whether it should be applied to this conflict. MerDefsGirl You're hiding behind your friends to get your own way. That's how I see it. Fighting for the people in your thread is a joke, you're just as selfish as I am in your motives. At least you could admit that. MDG please do not make assumptions as to Ryugi's goals and motivations. Ryugi is not the first or only person to field complaints from the roleplayers within his city. I have, and so has TMJ. Though the motivation for your attack is now clearly laid bare.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:05 pm
Since when are people not allowed to make assumptions, especially when they believe those assumptions to be true. He's not fighting for the people in the thread, it's mere pretext because he's bothered by me and wants no part in role-playing it. Secondly, my complaints only arose secondary to his complaints. Yes, my motivations are selfish, I wish to gain enjoyment from attacking his fortress city. I want a rematch for the first time when I used a partial force and failed miserably. I rebuilt my forces in some hopes of that. I came back to offer terms to hopefully covince him to let me. Quote: Only make meaningful replies. Useless comments will be deleted. Trolls will result in banning. Don't like the roleplaying? Ignore it, or report it if it breaks the rules. Are you suggesting I should be banned for stating what you quoted. Even after basically putting myself at Ryugi's mercy and asking his express permision. That is not trolling or flaming, so what are you trying to pull? Is this a veiled threat or a veiled intimidation ploy? I do not feel threatened or intimidated.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:10 pm
Well, heres something to think about for the complaints that multiple unnamed people dont want whatever they are doing disturbed: How many of you people roleplay one character, in multiple locations at once, at the same time? Like, different timelines. Be it several hours, a day, or a week ago. I would assume if the people who dont want to deal with some giant army showing up, they could do something like that, assume what they are doing at the moment takes place in the past from what's going on now?
Also, Ryugi, if you dont want to deal with an army personally, but you're not going to forbid it from doing anything or saying it doesnt exist altogether and it never happened, then why cant you hire people to do the job for you? Like... all those other war companies or armies out there.
CORPORATE WARFARE!?
Oh, yeah, dont bother answering those if you dont want to. They're like suggestions in the form of rhetorical questions to minimize conflict or something.
Oh, and excuse me while I make a shameless advertisement and attempt to add some humour to the argueing in this place: I'll go hunt down and CURB STOMP people's characters if anyone wants to pay me to do so in true mercenary fashion. Because I love money. Or well, in this case, fake money as in gaia gold as a backing so that I may organized and run mindless entertaining violence through bloodsport.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:25 pm
MerDefsGirl Since when are people not allowed to make assumptions, especially when they believe those assumptions to be true. He's not fighting for the people in the thread, it's mere pretext because he's bothered by me and wants no part in role-playing it. When your assumption falsely calls another role player selfish. A thinly veiled attack on his character as an individual. The issue of who he's fighting is irrelevant. The individuals he has mentions have brought concerns to members of the moderating staff. Your motivation is relevant because you were asked why you cannot simply ignore the city, and had yet to answer. Way of the Leviathan Only make meaningful replies. Useless comments will be deleted. Trolls will result in banning. Don't like the roleplaying? Ignore it, or report it if it breaks the rules.MerDefsGirl Are you suggesting I should be banned for stating what you quoted. Even after basically putting myself at Ryugi's mercy and asking his express permision. That is not trolling or flaming, so what are you trying to pull? Is this a veiled threat or a veiled intimidation ploy? I do not feel threatened or intimidated. No MDG. I am stating as I have emboldened that if Ryugi does like the roleplay he can choose to ignore it, similarly all the people within Lament who can complaints and do not like the roleplay your bringing, can choose to ignore it. At least, according to the current rule set. There is no threat or intimidation, and I am attempting to "pull" nothing. You have no broken any rules, thus there is no need for banning. I quoted the entire block of text so that I would not be accused of pulling the rules out of context.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:26 pm
This is what I came to respon to Ryugi Kazamaru MerDerf, look. I am not forbidding ANYONE from roleplaying in Lament. As I said, I created the thread so people would have a fun and interesting roleplaying environment. I did not say you couldn't roleplay there, I simply wanted to avoid an army vs army conflict. You are saying a type of roleplay is forbiden in your city, at least in this case. What's so interesting about a fortress city no one is allowed to assail. If you wanted a tourist attraction, you should have created Gambino island. Quote: Until you showed up in my thread, I had no idea you were raising an army to attack me. Until you mentioned it, I had no knowledge that Raven Industries was an enemy of West Fall. If you read anything besides your own direct posts you would know West Fall and R.I. have issues. Quote: When I had Lament contract with Raven Industries, all I had in mind was giving Lament an upgrade, both in weapons, and in living spaces. I didn't know I was picking a side in a war or whatever. Lament's stance has always been neutral, until the undead attacked, now they are highly opposed to undead. Lament, as well as myself, has no interest in making enemies of anyone. They would much rather make friends, and allies. Icly, West Fall is a mixed up political mess of warped motivations, including delusions of global conquest. All of which led to to movement of an army to attempt the occupation of your city. I roleplayed this out over a long period. They didn't come to make nice. OOCly, I wanted a rematch for the last battle, and I enjoy the idea of beseiging such a well defended fortress. I'm still asking you to expressly forbid me from attacking your city or to let it continue, but I'll make some offers to try to meet you half way if you let me continue. 1. West Fall is a human led force, they will not wantonly destroy the city or attempt to level it to the ground. 2. We can work out a partial seige situation to allow anyone else in your city to play out their scenario in peace or leave the city if they wish. I can let it sit for a reasonable time. 3. West Fall will not directly target civilians, non-combatants, civialian targets or instalation. 4. If victorious, West Fall will not level or dismantle the city, mantaining it and even repairing any battle damage. 5. I will hear out any other stipulations you may have. Quote: I did say please when I asked you to go around and not attack the city. I did not demand that you turn around and go home. I wanted a compromise that might work for both of us. Hopefully the above is that compromise. If you would rather not compromise, then I can accept your other fight challenge. However, I can only use Ryugi if the fight is non-cannon, as he is currently out of commission due to some other actions that took place elsewhere. I DO have one character left, but I've never used him before. So, the choice is up to you. Compromise and try to find a common ground. or Fight in the stadium with one of the characters. The challenge is mere venting on my part, and has nothing to do with the in situation of the armies and such ICly. If it is out of cannon, I would at least like you to accept a compromise like the one above if I win.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:05 pm
In light of information made available through actual research, if you want to call it that, as well as over 6 hours of musing and thinking while making and serving coffee to idiots--- this is my final decree on the matter at hand. As 'Administrator' and basic Super-Overlord for this guild, and with the given title of Vice Captain, what I say now is to be taken into effect without question or further dissension among the ranks. Any further comments, problems, or appeals may be made to my PM box. Any crew member not satisfied with my decision can also voice their opinion in the Mod Lounge. In the case of Lament vs West Fall, Lament is allowed this one-time pass at not having to deal with the army at their doorstep. Role-playing may resume as normal, and the army, with no people to interact with, is ordered to 'warp' back to where it came from, thus erasing the trip and eventual goal-- thus giving West Fall Army the option of altering any plot and heading elsewhere. I say one-time, because for the future, no member of this crew is going to be the shield for any other person in this guild, or put into this kind of position again. I hereby implore the owner of said army to next time make the attacking force more 'realistic' interpret this as you will), and more visible effort into building up said forces. According to Crew findings, there was little to none of this, enough to satisfy all involved. Defenders should not exactly be sent a faxed letterhead stating 'Hi, we are coming to kill you', but should be given ample enough time to prepare for any invasion or siege. A more visceral 'Rules of Engagement' will be drawn up by the crew of this guild so that this does not happen again in the future. As it is, you cannot rape the willing, and so on and so forth. Mutual contention is as important as having the upper hand, however I do not want this guild to fall into the trap of people always having to gain clearance for some type of fight or conflict.. As for defenders, and specifically Ryugi himself--- no matter the type of defenses any place has-- if it has them then it expects and attempts to be prepared to fend off any trouble. As it was stated before, this is a fighting guild and fights can break out at anytime, just like in the real world. And just like in the real world, you can find places to get away from it all and relax. As it is, there is no victory for anyone here. Everyone should be ashamed for the simple fact that the one thing we all come here to do could not be done: role-play. No one is going to be banned, or told how to role-play, simply a lesson in moderation and humility. To sum it up; both parties have been given a do-over and the reset button has been hit. This is the compromise and it will never be given to anyone again. Take it or leave it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:50 am
Just no. No to everyone at once, because apparently nobody is even paying attention anymore. MDS, you have one choice to make at this point. Whether or not you're going to just get the hell out of the guild. No joking around, no kidding about it, and no, I'm not going to ban you for being a right douche to Ryugi this whole time and attacking him personally over the matter. You don't fit in. You don't have the right mindset. You don't care about preserving a 'fun environment for roleplay' for anyone other than yourself. So just leave. I can guarantee you'll like it better somewhere else. Seriously, get the hell out of the guild if you just can't ******** stand it. Otherwise shut up and accept that sometimes people just don't want to play with you and have the right to completely blow you off. I certainly wouldn't hesitate to do so, and I'm sure a lot of us here share the sentiment. All of you, the next person I see spam pointless blather in this thread is getting a 24 hour temp-ban. Think of this as the first warning before repercussions come into effect. This also applies to petty insults sheepishly disguised as actual comments. Keep it clean, or you're going in the penalty box. First person, banned. Second person, post deleted and thread locked.  And Ed... no. No decrees from on high about what our global policy is. We just spent a week going over this. Suggest your solution (and it is a good suggestion, I'd honestly vote for it at this point), but do not dictate that anyone who has a problem with it just has to suck it up and grow some balls. NOW PLAY NICE.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 1:42 am
Don't threaten or talk down to members Josh.
If its the very same thing I get nagged at for, then it will certainly apply to you.
MerfDerf, excuse Josh.
Also, Josh, you have no claim to be throwing temp-bans at anyone. X is the one to replace Kraun, and the OOC will be his realm from now on..
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 5:00 am
I've warned, let it be known that when I say I mean it, I actually mean it. Custard can come back at dawn tomorrow. Oh, and I have a dispute with people that see a warning, and are for some reason tempted to TEST the warning. edit for below: Yes, Matt, that also counted. Post deleted. edit for below that: themightyjello This also applies to petty insults sheepishly disguised as actual comments. This applies to you as well, Reiko. Keep it up and you're getting a time-out too.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|