Welcome to Gaia! ::

Mystery Guild of Randomness

Back to Guilds

Life is Random, so are we! 

Tags: Random, Occasional Contests, Games, Role-playing, Questions 

Reply ❅ THE MUSEUM - Old topics we should never forget
Wicca Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

PitifulSoulLostInDarkness

Wheezing Sex Symbol

8,600 Points
  • Forum Junior 100
  • Invisibility 100
  • First step to fame 200
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:20 am


Ok Alaois......i have read your post and guess what......as everyone has said...you have no idea what you are talking about....you dont have to be in a coven to be a wiccan...you dont have to strip down naked to worship anyone...you dont have to worship the lord and the lady....we believe in the lord and the lady but we dont worship them....that is neopaganism...what obviously you claim to be....if you really are a neopagan you need to do your research instead of posting fake and pseudoinformative links that give me nothing don't back your point. Oh and on one of your recent posts...you be three years of age and be a wiccan if you want....you dont have to be 30 to 40 years old.....you are utterly insane...and until you find some sound and decent information that can prove your point...maybe you should just stop posting because you are just digging yourself deeper into a hole.......please do more research that isn't a post from gaia...that are people who claim to know what they are talking about....because obviously they dont...i have been studying Wicca for a long time now.....and everything you do is a choice....you can be a solitary witch and be a wiccan....but a witch cannot be a wiccan... and here proves my point to this you have stated that you cant be a solitary witch and be wiccan...well guess what you can...because there are many witches that are wiccans...here for example are three...solitary witches, kitchen witches, and garden witches...and many many more......me myself, i am a solitary witch...so please when you finally learn that you are wrong ..... come back and maybe i we can teach you somethings!!!!
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:21 am


Alaois
{For Those that Say you can be Solitary and Wiccan}

read that, it is written up by a 3rd degree elder in Alexandrian (I believe) Wicca


GIVE ME A BOOK BY A REAL PRIESTS NOT SOMEONE ON GAIA! OR BETTER YET LOOK UP SOME REAL WICCAN SITES!

Fangmoonlight


PitifulSoulLostInDarkness

Wheezing Sex Symbol

8,600 Points
  • Forum Junior 100
  • Invisibility 100
  • First step to fame 200
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:33 am


And here you go ..... what just a little research will do .....>>


Solitary Life

It seems that a majority of Wiccans first learned of Wicca by reading books and visiting pagan websites. They become interested and actively seek out the pagan community in their area to join or form their own coven. Then, there are those that continue their solitary studies but stay in the outskirts of the pagan community, taking advantage of open opportunities in the community but never joining or forming a coven. These are the solitary Wiccans. Being a solitary Wiccan has advantages and disadvantages, and it is up to the individual to weigh them.

It is true that sometimes it is not a choice for the Wiccan to be a soliary practioner. When there are no known groups to join, or there is seemingly no way to make contacts within a spiritual path, one must learn to work alone. But hopefully, revealed here are reasons why it might not necessarily be a negative option.



Some find that the most powerful advantage is the individually-defined focus of study. With a self-defined focus, it is ensured that the Wiccan’s desire to learn specific topics is always met. There are really no limitations to the Wiccan’s study. The down side to this is that there is no one to guide the learner; therefore, the learner may be missing important teachings, healthy discussions, suggestions, and helpful criticism.



Another advantage to solitary study and work is that it avoids all the problems that can arise from a group/coven dynamic. Examples of these group pressures include group obligations and member competition, among others. There are no set meetings nor any worry of personality conflicts. Also, there is no conflict between neighboring covens (witch wars).



The problem with missing coven dynamic is that the learner is not exposed to the multiple interpretations that would be available to them in a study group or coven. It is always possible for the learner to be influences by a particular text and not be aware of differing interpretations. This could lead to a very hollow study of items that should be explored more deeply. (The problem with this, of course, is that the more interpretations are revealed, the more confused the learner can become.) Also, there is no collaboration with others or group experiences to spark new flames of thought.



An advantage is that the solitare comes closer to the truth behind their faith. They nuture the personal relationship with the deities, and with that reach new levels of enlightenment. They divide their day as they choose, between their work and their study, and accustom themselves to the everyday practice of their faith. This helps them become life-long learners, because they find their own sparks of understanding.



It’s true that the solitary Wiccan must be self-driven and their interest must be self-sustaining in order for their learning to develop and grow over the years, and they alone reap the rewards. Remember, the first step on a spiritual journey must be taken alone.



Coven Life


A coven is a congregation of Wiccans who worship together. A coven generally has a chosen tradition and pantheon, which all members belong. But there are also covens which the members follow different paths, but come together to either celebrate common sabbats or practice magick for common purposes.



Although covens vary in size and membership qualifications, there are some generalities. A coven is generally between three and thirteen members including a High Priestess and/or High Priest who leads the gatherings and rituals. Covens can have systems of degree, based on study and practice of certain rituals, spells, et-cetera, with the goal of becoming a High Priestess/Priest or Elder. Some covens have open membership, and others have process of initiation, normally involving a period of study for a year and a day.



Training groups are also a form of coven, where an Elder of High Priestess/Priest of a nearby coven is contacted by individuals interested in learning more about Wicca and/or Witchcraft. The Priestess/Priest provides informational meetings and practical training of magick usage for the interested. It is rare that money is charged for this training, and it is common that the neophytes later join the Priestess/Priest’s coven.



When a coven’s membership has grown too large for them to meet easily, it is common for the coven to ‘hive’, or break off into smaller covens. A Priestess/Priest of high degree is chosen to lead a new coven, and part of the large coven’s congregation joins this new coven.



With multiple covens in one area, disagreements can occur. This is referred to as a ‘witch war.’ Like all religions, individual covens can have individual beliefs and a tension can form between covens of differing beliefs. It is a rarity, but should be avoided at all costs by opening up a calm forum of discussion to work matters out. When Wiccans and/or Witches fight amongst each other, it reflects badly on us all.



And if you dont believe me here is the link....

http://www.wiccanlife.com/?s=solitary+witch
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 6:57 am


RavenHawk: (not from gaia)
Smile
Blessings to you.
Yes you can Wiccan without a coven. We call these type of people solitary practioners. I for matter of belong to no coven. I have Bride as patron deity an use Thor or Dagda as a God sometimes. I personally don't believe in the concetp of Lord an Lady in a general sense no. If you are asking can you be christian an still use the structure that Wicca gives you the answer is yes. I know 2 main types of christian groups out there the Rosacrusians an the Kabalists. The Kabala has a very strong christian following. You find that Rosacrusians are deeply involed withe Kabala. It is very good stuff. I once had a student who was catholic based she used the christian God as her patron deity. It didn't bother me any for it was the students deity an not mine an I was about to stop free will. She later went on to study Voodoo an now she works Voodoo. Voodoo an houdou are very christian based they use the saints an everything. If your not christian thats okay I am just talking in general because most people are disgruntled crhistian when they find Wicca. Hey its true I was one of those digrunteled christians. There is two things you need to know about Wiccans. First thing is we respect free will as long as it doesn't hurt anybody else. The one law we all follow is " Do as thou wilt, harm ye none". It is simple an oh so complex. Those simply words define who we are. We are not a faith based "religion" persay. Everything we do follw up with action. It does no good to cast a spell for a job an not to go look. Cast a money spell an not look for away to get it is just silly. If your sick go the doctor faith won't heal yeah but energy an herbs will help you feel better faster. Coomon Sense rules our world. So in one simply word to answer all your questions is YES, YES YOU CAN.

Sparky_the3rd

Invisible Wolf

8,875 Points
  • Invisibility 100
  • Demonic Associate 100
  • The Wolf Within 100

Alaois

Prophet

PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 10:36 am


PitifulSoulLostInDarkness
Ok Alaois......i have read your post and guess what......as everyone has said...you have no idea what you are talking about....you dont have to be in a coven to be a wiccan...you dont have to strip down naked to worship anyone...you dont have to worship the lord and the lady....we believe in the lord and the lady but we dont worship them....that is neopaganism...what obviously you claim to be....if you really are a neopagan you need to do your research instead of posting fake and pseudoinformative links that give me nothing don't back your point. Oh and on one of your recent posts...you be three years of age and be a wiccan if you want....you dont have to be 30 to 40 years old.....you are utterly insane...and until you find some sound and decent information that can prove your point...maybe you should just stop posting because you are just digging yourself deeper into a hole.......please do more research that isn't a post from gaia...that are people who claim to know what they are talking about....because obviously they dont...i have been studying Wicca for a long time now.....and everything you do is a choice....you can be a solitary witch and be a wiccan....but a witch cannot be a wiccan... and here proves my point to this you have stated that you cant be a solitary witch and be wiccan...well guess what you can...because there are many witches that are wiccans...here for example are three...solitary witches, kitchen witches, and garden witches...and many many more......me myself, i am a solitary witch...so please when you finally learn that you are wrong ..... come back and maybe i we can teach you somethings!!!!


so speaking to two Wiccans, one from Gardnerian Wicca (a 1st degree) and the other from Alexandrian Wicca (a 3rd degree Elder) aren't valid sources? I also cannot forget about BTW Seeket, a man who has been searching for the right Coven for the last 20+ years and is just now learning Gardnerian Outer Court...none of them are valid sources?

All three are well versed in Wicca, Neo-paganism, and other forms of witchcraft...

Oh and I cannot forget Sang, a 20 year trained Hedgewitch (I believe...not completely sure)?

None of them are valid?

And wow...look at that, over use the ... why don't you?

being Wicca is not a Right, it takes time, effort, and a lot of work. Not everyone is cut out to be Wicca. I'm not, I can honestly admit that. And the sexual rituals are not the reason why.

@Moon:

where is your source from this talk with "Ravenhawk?"

@PitifulSoulLostInDarkness again:

Kat's page is nothing more then her OPINION. there are no sources for her statements. It's a blog and nothing more.

At least the Wicca FAQ gives sources and many of them at that.

Try a better source next time. rolleyes

@Fangmoonlight:

I've read books. I've read books by Gardner (the Father of Wicca), Buckland (the Oathbreaker), Cunningham (the 1st degree initiate would left to form Standing Stone Solitary Witchcraft, originally called Neo-Wicca), Mama Silver (the worst source ever...woman has no idea what she is talking about), among many other authors. I've read websites, I've looked over many sources.

So far the only thing I've had wrong was intercourse is actually involved in higher level rituals between high priest/priestess and other 3rd degree Wiccans.

Seriously, give me an academic source (excluding ReligiousTolerance.org, there Wicca section is wrong...and seriously messed up).

The Wicca FAQ {Right Here} has several academic sources and is maintained and posted in by two Wiccans we have proof of their lineage (Scorplett and Morgandria) and has many Neo-Pagans that post there that know what they are talking about.

I can also refer you to The Amber and Jet Mailing list {Right Here} which can give you information on Covens in your area and also help identify fraudulent covens that claim to have lineage back to Gardner, but really don't.

Do not tell me I'm wrong...I know what I'm talking about. Try again.
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:56 am


Alaois
PitifulSoulLostInDarkness
Ok Alaois......i have read your post and guess what......as everyone has said...you have no idea what you are talking about....you dont have to be in a coven to be a wiccan...you dont have to strip down naked to worship anyone...you dont have to worship the lord and the lady....we believe in the lord and the lady but we dont worship them....that is neopaganism...what obviously you claim to be....if you really are a neopagan you need to do your research instead of posting fake and pseudoinformative links that give me nothing don't back your point. Oh and on one of your recent posts...you be three years of age and be a wiccan if you want....you dont have to be 30 to 40 years old.....you are utterly insane...and until you find some sound and decent information that can prove your point...maybe you should just stop posting because you are just digging yourself deeper into a hole.......please do more research that isn't a post from gaia...that are people who claim to know what they are talking about....because obviously they dont...i have been studying Wicca for a long time now.....and everything you do is a choice....you can be a solitary witch and be a wiccan....but a witch cannot be a wiccan... and here proves my point to this you have stated that you cant be a solitary witch and be wiccan...well guess what you can...because there are many witches that are wiccans...here for example are three...solitary witches, kitchen witches, and garden witches...and many many more......me myself, i am a solitary witch...so please when you finally learn that you are wrong ..... come back and maybe i we can teach you somethings!!!!


so speaking to two Wiccans, one from Gardnerian Wicca (a 1st degree) and the other from Alexandrian Wicca (a 3rd degree Elder) aren't valid sources? I also cannot forget about BTW Seeket, a man who has been searching for the right Coven for the last 20+ years and is just now learning Gardnerian Outer Court...none of them are valid sources?

All three are well versed in Wicca, Neo-paganism, and other forms of witchcraft...

Oh and I cannot forget Sang, a 20 year trained Hedgewitch (I believe...not completely sure)?

None of them are valid?

And I got word of the exact opposite from a High Priest a High Priestess and someone who had studied it for well over 10 years before she even claimed she belonged to that faith.
And they are not valid sources? Just because they prove you wrong?
I found government documents stated that solitary practitioners were considered just as much a part of the wiccan faith. In fact, the ONLY sources I have ever come across that claimed soloists weren't wiccan are the sources you put out. Every wiccan I have ever met (before the people in the thread yesterday) claimed solitary practice as a practice of the faith. Going all the way back to when I was first exposed to wicca at the age of 8. for going on 13 years I have never met a wiccan that said you must practice in a coven to be a member of the faith.

Yet none of these wiccans have validity? Even when one of them is a 58 year old woman and another is that womans 35 year old daughter who was raised in the religion as her mom had been practicing it since she was 15? And to top that, they own a shop together that sells many of the incense, oracle, precious stones, herbs all that stuff that I honestly don't know anything about. But they have no validity? just because ONE category of wicca denounces any other subcategory?? seeing the logic here? you can be of a faith. Not all members have to accept you. but the numbers of people that you do not count as wiccan actually outnumber the ones you do call wiccans?

Alaois
And wow...look at that, over use the ... why don't you?

... It's called an ellipsis.

Alaois
being Wicca is not a Right, it takes time, effort, and a lot of work. Not everyone is cut out to be Wicca. I'm not, I can honestly admit that. And the sexual rituals are not the reason why.

and you don't think that these people who do not practice in a group do not put in just as much work and effort and belief in the religion?

Alaois
@Moon:

where is your source from this talk with "Ravenhawk?"

it sounds like it was an email or a PM of some sort

Alaois
@PitifulSoulLostInDarkness again:

Kat's page is nothing more then her OPINION. there are no sources for her statements. It's a blog and nothing more.

At least the Wicca FAQ gives sources and many of them at that.

Try a better source next time. rolleyes

It doesn't matter what we cite. If it isn't written by someone biased to the "true belief" you refuse to accept it as a credible source. Hence why you ignored my army source and my us court source and all my sources that include solitary practice as a practice of the wiccan religion.

you refuse to accept them as credible because they aren't written by who you want them to be by

Alaois
@Fangmoonlight:

I've read books. I've read books by Gardner (the Father of Wicca), Buckland (the Oathbreaker), Cunningham (the 1st degree initiate would left to form Standing Stone Solitary Witchcraft, originally called Neo-Wicca), Mama Silver (the worst source ever...woman has no idea what she is talking about), among many other authors. I've read websites, I've looked over many sources.

So far the only thing I've had wrong was intercourse is actually involved in higher level rituals between high priest/priestess and other 3rd degree Wiccans.

Seriously, give me an academic source (excluding ReligiousTolerance.org, there Wicca section is wrong...and seriously messed up).

why exclude it? Its a credible source. Is it because it wasn't written by a "true" wiccan? =/ seriously. I gave MANY good credible sources from many people who have been studying the faith of wicca for many years.

Alaois
The Wicca FAQ {Right Here} has several academic sources and is maintained and posted in by two Wiccans we have proof of their lineage (Scorplett and Morgandria) and has many Neo-Pagans that post there that know what they are talking about.

I can also refer you to The Amber and Jet Mailing list {Right Here} which can give you information on Covens in your area and also help identify fraudulent covens that claim to have lineage back to Gardner, but really don't.

Do not tell me I'm wrong...I know what I'm talking about. Try again.
again, you do not have to follow a religion 100% to be a part of that religion. With this logic a car would only be a car if it were parked in a garage. If it is parked on the street, in a carport, in a driveway, does that make it any less of a car?

Leave them be to practice the religion as they see fit. AND If these wiccans are studying wicca, yet you say that wicca has to be in a coven, then don't you think they would have run across that in at least ONE of their study materials? Funny how the only people of the religious faith that disagree are the ones who are having one of their traditions ignored. Yet the rest seem very content.

MatchaCosmos


Alaois

Prophet

PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 12:22 pm


~Ichigo_Pie~

And I got word of the exact opposite from a High Priest a High Priestess and someone who had studied it for well over 10 years before she even claimed she belonged to that faith.
And they are not valid sources? Just because they prove you wrong?
I found government documents stated that solitary practitioners were considered just as much a part of the wiccan faith. In fact, the ONLY sources I have ever come across that claimed soloists weren't wiccan are the sources you put out. Every wiccan I have ever met (before the people in the thread yesterday) claimed solitary practice as a practice of the faith. Going all the way back to when I was first exposed to wicca at the age of 8. for going on 13 years I have never met a wiccan that said you must practice in a coven to be a member of the faith.

Yet none of these wiccans have validity? Even when one of them is a 58 year old woman and another is that womans 35 year old daughter who was raised in the religion as her mom had been practicing it since she was 15? And to top that, they own a shop together that sells many of the incense, oracle, precious stones, herbs all that stuff that I honestly don't know anything about. But they have no validity? just because ONE category of wicca denounces any other subcategory?? seeing the logic here? you can be of a faith. Not all members have to accept you. but the numbers of people that you do not count as wiccan actually outnumber the ones you do call wiccans?


Once again, I will state it. You are not a Wiccan if you're not in a Coven. It isn't that hard to understand. Government sources aren't going to correct either, specially ones that are from court. They are going to generalize everything. Hell, I was a Criminal Justice Major at one point, you should see how generalized some of the law papers can be.

Anything you learn about Wicca is considered OUTER COURT, if a High Priest/Priestess is telling you anything about Wicca they are either breaking their oath to the Lord and Lady...or they ******** lying to you.

Wicca isn't passed from mother to daughter. You are cross gender-initiated, meaning if you're a male you are initiated by the High Priestess and if you're a female you are initiated by the High Priest.

And the ONE category you're talking about is the Traditional or the one all other 'branches' have started from.

Traditional Wicca is Gardnerian, Alexanderian, and Central Valley (I think that is right). all others are Neo-Pagan and not Wicca, unless they can trace their lineage through training of their high priest/priestess back to gardner.

Wicca isn't a religion for everyone, they don't want everyone; if they did...their rituals, beliefs, and practices would be common knowledge by now. Hell the religion is only 60 years old.

Quote:
It doesn't matter what we cite. If it isn't written by someone biased to the "true belief" you refuse to accept it as a credible source. Hence why you ignored my army source and my us court source and all my sources that include solitary practice as a practice of the wiccan religion.

you refuse to accept them as credible because they aren't written by who you want them to be by


I refuse to accept a source that is an opinion. Kat (the writer of that website) has no source or proof to back her claims of anything she said in her BLOG. If there was sources to back her claims, that would be a different story.


Quote:
why exclude it? Its a credible source. Is it because it wasn't written by a "true" wiccan? =/ seriously. I gave MANY good credible sources from many people who have been studying the faith of wicca for many years.


Why exclude Religious Tolerance.org?

Because they haven't expanded on their Wicca section since it was written. It is misinformed, even after repeated attempts to explain to them that they need to update their page.

That is why.

You gave several sources that had no source of their own besides opinions. The sources couldn't even back up their own sources. rolleyes

Quote:
again, you do not have to follow a religion 100% to be a part of that religion. With this logic a car would only be a car if it were parked in a garage. If it is parked on the street, in a carport, in a driveway, does that make it any less of a car?

Leave them be to practice the religion as they see fit. AND If these wiccans are studying wicca, yet you say that wicca has to be in a coven, then don't you think they would have run across that in at least ONE of their study materials? Funny how the only people of the religious faith that disagree are the ones who are having one of their traditions ignored. Yet the rest seem very content.


I will say the same thing, any research you do, be it online or in a book, will be outer court. The simple stuff anyone can do and find. Even Mama Silver's (Silver Ravenwolf) books can be considered Outer Court, regardless if she is only Pagan and was never initiated. You will not be told everything while doing studies from only books and websites. You need to go out and search for a Coven and speak to them to learn more. Even if you find a coven, they may not even take you. Like I said before, it can take years if not decades before you find the right Coven for you.

BTW seeket spoke of someone who travels 3000 miles once a month to train with his coven. See how that works? I hope you do.

Wicca cannot be changed, because you do not agree with parts of it. You need to be a Coven to be Wiccan and to learn who the true Lord and Lady are. If you ever leave, you're no longer Wiccan because you left the coven.

You're still a witch, or solitary practitioner, which isn't a bad thing. But you're not a Wiccan. You're not a Wiccan until you become a 1st degree initiate in a coven with lineage to Gardner.

I will use a simple example to explain something.

You cannot go around calling yourself a Catholic, it is something earned once you do confession, the sacraments, and finally eat/drink the body and blood of Christ.

See how that works?
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:02 pm


Alaois

Once again, I will state it. You are not a Wiccan if you're not in a Coven. It isn't that hard to understand. Government sources aren't going to correct either, specially ones that are from court. They are going to generalize everything. Hell, I was a Criminal Justice Major at one point, you should see how generalized some of the law papers can be.

doesn't matter. the law considers them part of the same religion. just as the majority of the nation does, regardless of what your "Traditional" Wiccans believe

Alaois
Anything you learn about Wicca is considered OUTER COURT, if a High Priest/Priestess is telling you anything about Wicca they are either breaking their oath to the Lord and Lady...or they ******** lying to you.

except that all they told me is how long they've practiced (the two that are high PRT/PRTSS told me they were in said position) and told me that you and everyone else are ******** morons. That is their words exactly.

Alaois
Wicca isn't passed from mother to daughter. You are cross gender-initiated, meaning if you're a male you are initiated by the High Priestess and if you're a female you are initiated by the High Priest.
I never said she was initiated by her mother. She was taught the religious beliefs from her mother. I never said anything about being initiated.

Alaois
And the ONE category you're talking about is the Traditional or the one all other 'branches' have started from.

Traditional Wicca is Gardnerian, Alexanderian, and Central Valley (I think that is right). all others are Neo-Pagan and not Wicca, unless they can trace their lineage through training of their high priest/priestess back to gardner.
WICCA IS NEO-PAGAN Thus ANY sub-category of Wicca is going to be neo-pagan. Your "traditional" wiccans are neo-pagans just as much as the solitary practitioners.

Alaois
Alaois
Wicca isn't a religion for everyone, they don't want everyone; if they did...their rituals, beliefs, and practices would be common knowledge by now. Hell the religion is only 60 years old.


Quote:
It doesn't matter what we cite. If it isn't written by someone biased to the "true belief" you refuse to accept it as a credible source. Hence why you ignored my army source and my us court source and all my sources that include solitary practice as a practice of the wiccan religion.

you refuse to accept them as credible because they aren't written by who you want them to be by


I refuse to accept a source that is an opinion. Kat (the writer of that website) has no source or proof to back her claims of anything she said in her BLOG. If there was sources to back her claims, that would be a different story.

I have posted all kind of sources that were not opinions. You are aware that opinions are "I think, I believe." Right? Just because someone posts something on a website without a source does not mean that is their opinion. And actually. You do NOT have to cite common knowledge. It is common knowledge in the united states that all sub-categories of Wicca are a part of wicca. Hence why they are a sub-category of said religion. So when people post this in their websites saying "Most practice in covens, some practice solitary" it is not necessarily an opinion and is just as credible as any academic citation anyone can pull up.

Alaois
Quote:
why exclude it? Its a credible source. Is it because it wasn't written by a "true" wiccan? =/ seriously. I gave MANY good credible sources from many people who have been studying the faith of wicca for many years.


Why exclude Religious Tolerance.org?

Because they haven't expanded on their Wicca section since it was written. It is misinformed, even after repeated attempts to explain to them that they need to update their page.
It is misinformed because it doesn't agree with what YOU have been told. Please tell me how updating is supposed to prove anything when the "Traditional" Wicca shouldn't have changed at all since before that post was written? It's called Traditional for a reason. Because it is everlasting and barely changing. The change isn't significant enough to need to update the religion as a whole. Unless of course, you're including the ever-changing, ever-growing sub-wiccan groups. Then updating is necessary.

Alaois
That is why.

You gave several sources that had no source of their own besides opinions. The sources couldn't even back up their own sources. rolleyes

None of my credible sources I posted said "I think / I believe" nor any variation. Again, just because it does not have a source does not make it an opinion. You do not have to cite common knowledge. It is not plagiarism.

Alaois
Quote:
again, you do not have to follow a religion 100% to be a part of that religion. With this logic a car would only be a car if it were parked in a garage. If it is parked on the street, in a carport, in a driveway, does that make it any less of a car?

Leave them be to practice the religion as they see fit. AND If these wiccans are studying wicca, yet you say that wicca has to be in a coven, then don't you think they would have run across that in at least ONE of their study materials? Funny how the only people of the religious faith that disagree are the ones who are having one of their traditions ignored. Yet the rest seem very content.


I will say the same thing, any research you do, be it online or in a book, will be outer court. The simple stuff anyone can do and find. Even Mama Silver's (Silver Ravenwolf) books can be considered Outer Court, regardless if she is only Pagan and was never initiated. You will not be told everything while doing studies from only books and websites. You need to go out and search for a Coven and speak to them to learn more. Even if you find a coven, they may not even take you. Like I said before, it can take years if not decades before you find the right Coven for you.
I don't want a coven. I want no part in the religion. I really don't believe in magic so it is a useless religion to me . I can also bet that you will not be taught EVERYTHING there is to Wicca just because you join a coven. So it really doesn't make a difference. No matter what you learn, there is ALWAYS more to learn. There is no need to seclude a bunch of people because they do not practice the exact same way. You keep saying that Wicca is not a right... but it is a religion. I hate to break this to you. But all a religion is, is a set of common beliefs spread over a large group of people.

Alaois
BTW seeket spoke of someone who travels 3000 miles once a month to train with his coven. See how that works? I hope you do.
So? All that proves is that someone has too damn much money.

Alaois
Wicca cannot be changed, because you do not agree with parts of it. You need to be a Coven to be Wiccan and to learn who the true Lord and Lady are. If you ever leave, you're no longer Wiccan because you left the coven.
No, a religion cannot be changed... hence why a sub-religion is CREATED. They believe the same beliefs, practice them differently. The beliefs are wiccan beliefs. The people who hold and practice Wiccan Belief are Wiccans. regardless of how you practice.

Alaois
You're still a witch, or solitary practitioner, which isn't a bad thing. But you're not a Wiccan. You're not a Wiccan until you become a 1st degree initiate in a coven with lineage to Gardner.

There are wiccans who are witches. just as there are witches who do not practice wicca. However, the Witches that practice Wicca are Wiccan. Being solitary or being in a coven. Being a witch or not, practicing magic or not. If you believe in the beliefs, you are a part of that religion.

Alaois
I will use a simple example to explain something.

You cannot go around calling yourself a Catholic, it is something earned once you do confession, the sacraments, and finally eat/drink the body and blood of Christ.

See how that works?

yet you can still study and be a catholic, you just can't be a member of the catholic church and you cannot take communion there. But they still welcome visitors and are glad to educate outsiders to their beliefs. And just because you are not a member of the catholic church does not mean that you are not a member of the christian faith, so your example is very fail.

MatchaCosmos


Sparky_the3rd

Invisible Wolf

8,875 Points
  • Invisibility 100
  • Demonic Associate 100
  • The Wolf Within 100
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:13 pm


owo wow....o= oh and I got that from a person on wiccatogether.com.... a wiccan site I found a long time ago......but I've told you what I was going to do...=3 so..yea...^^" Ichigo you and
Alaois have fun....
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:13 am


Alaois
Russkye Princessa
moon_the_angel_of_hell
Alaois
Russkye Princessa
Well, I'm Wiccan, But I do not worship any wiccan god such as Diana, Kali, Venus etc. I honor the watchtower gods and believe in changing things with the energy around me =]


....Why the hell would you change Wicca?

If you change it, then you're not following the true religion...

You're a Neo-Pagan...

gonk

How many times must I say that?


She said she likes changing the energy around her....not changing the religion. Btw I don't give out my age, I'm not a child, i've been doing wicca for years now and I have my teacher...


Exactly, Thank you.

Why would I want to change Wicca?
Funny you say that being there is about 12 different types of Wicca so..yeah.


And I'm not Neo-Pagan.
I use Raphael and Uriel (East) to guide me during rituals.
Invoking any other gods(ess)/angels/entities besides the ones I have accordingly to my birth etc sounds completely irresponsible and childish.

And it's not like I don't follow the same rules that you do.


Wicca, British Traditional Wicca, is the only real Wicca out there. Yes, there maybe other sects out there, but they aren't Wicca, just riding on the name. Cunningham's branch of what was once called Wicca doesn't even use that term anymore. They are all Solitary Witches.

Unless your lineage can be traced back to Gardner (which isn't that hard to prove), are over the age of 18/21 (as stated previously in my prior post), and you follow Gardnerian or Alexandrian traditions, you're not Wiccan.

Simple, easy to be worded statement.

How come everyone and their brother believe they're Wiccan but do not understand the core concept of what I've said?

So Russkye what is your lineage and age?

My Mother is Wiccan, And she does have a lineage dating back to Ireland from when her great-great-grandmother was converted by her husband's family. My father practices Gadanye which is basically described as Russian Voodoo. It's very energy based and it is used for reading the future, psychic protection, etc..and passed down from generation to generation, but is private, and it is taboo to be write the spells. I'm 17 almost 18 but I have had guidance my whole life and I'm pretty experienced. I don't mesh my religion with the other. I only practice Wicca.

KRASAVICA


BVBarmy4life

6,350 Points
  • Forum Sophomore 300
  • Somebody Likes You 100
  • Signature Look 250
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:24 am


I'm wiccan and my parents are always forcing me to go to church on sundays. it's ******** up and i hate it.
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:35 am


Russkye Princessa
Alaois

So Russkye what is your lineage and age?

My Mother is Wiccan, And she does have a lineage dating back to Ireland from when her great-great-grandmother was converted by her husband's family. My father practices Gadanye which is basically described as Russian Voodoo. It's very energy based and it is used for reading the future, psychic protection, etc..and passed down from generation to generation, but is private, and it is taboo to be write the spells. I'm 17 almost 18 but I have had guidance my whole life and I'm pretty experienced. I don't mesh my religion with the other. I only practice Wicca.


Please, either change your font size or color...that is a pain in the a** to read.

now that I've said that

By lineage I do not mean by birth (Wicca is only 60 years old, so your great-great grandmother could not be Wiccan...hell my Grand parents were born during the end of WW2 so my great grand parents would have been born in the late 1910s or the 1920s.

By Lineage I mean by training. High Priest/Priestess was trained by High Priestess/High Priest, so on and so forth back til you end up at Gardner. Now that is Traditional Wicca, which is the standard true Wiccan and were most modern forms of "Wicca" got their start.

You also have Popular Wicca (everything else and is predominately solitary practice), which is mainly called Standing Stone.

Voodoo is, yes, usually passed down through the generation as is Witchcraft. Wicca is not.

You more then likely practice Witchcraft, which is not a bad thing, but you're not Wicca, at least not in the sense you describe it.

@Princessbrat:

Are you only "wiccan" because you want to rebel against Mommy and Daddy?

Alaois

Prophet


ShadowGrafAngel

PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 5:56 pm


I admit i'm not Wiccan myself, nor do i have any friends that are Wiccan. All i know is that i did a bit of research after i heard about it, and i found that i had a fasination with Wicca. My parents are really against me even talking about the Wiccan religion because they fear that i will start worshiping Satan. I really wish they'd open up their minds to Wicca, instead of listening to the rumors about it.
PostPosted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:16 pm


I can't tell you how many times people have asked me if I worshiped "Satan". gonk
It's VERY annoying. I've even tried to explain that I don't believe in the devil, that the Goddess and her Consort are many faced and things such as that and then they're like "That's cool. So you worship the devil?" sweatdrop

EDIT:
After reading the above discussion I must put in my two cents. Wiccan is neo-paganism. It is descended from the ancient Celtic religions, but it has been changed. The Wiccan Rede that most follow was not added until modern times and was essentially written as a poem.

Also, I am a solitary practitioner. This does NOT mean I am not Wiccan and it is utterly ridiculous to say that one must be taught directly under a High Priestess or Priest.

Also, Silver Ravenwolf is an idiot and to follow some of her advice will get you killed. If you don't believe me, try out her little trick for finding objects by capturing a faerie.

Dear Goddess! It never ceases to amaze me how ignorant people can be of a religion they claim to be!

renkurasaki


Calelith

Apocalyptic Rogue

41,915 Points
  • Hellraiser 500
  • Abomination 100
  • Demonic Associate 100
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 2:12 am


renkurasaki

After reading the above discussion I must put in my two cents. Wiccan is neo-paganism. It is descended from the ancient Celtic religions, but it has been changed. The Wiccan Rede that most follow was not added until modern times and was essentially written as a poem.


Yes, Wicca is neo-pagan, but it did not come from older Celtic religions. It's was formed in England, not Ireland.


Quote:
Also, I am a solitary practitioner. This does NOT mean I am not Wiccan and it is utterly ridiculous to say that one must be taught directly under a High Priestess or Priest.


You must be at least 18 years of age and cross-gender initiated into a coven who's lineage can be traced back to Gerald Gardner or his original coven. If not, you're not Wiccan, you would be an Eclectic Neo-Pagan. There is nothing wrong with being Eclectic, you just aren't Wiccan unless you go through the steps to become one; considering in Wicca you're a clergy member of your practice.


Quote:
Also, Silver Ravenwolf is an idiot and to follow some of her advice will get you killed. If you don't believe me, try out her little trick for finding objects by capturing a faerie.


Yes, Mama Silver is probably the perfect example of fluffybunnyism out there.

Try {The Wicca FAQ}


Quote:
Dear Goddess! It never ceases to amaze me how ignorant people can be of a religion they claim to be!


You seem to be at least slightly educated on the matter, but not fully.

Are you under the belief that Wicca is a 'nature' based religion or that it's a fertility witchcult?
Reply
❅ THE MUSEUM - Old topics we should never forget

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum