|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 2:35 am
My friend says that she's vegatarian but she eats chicken and fish. We asked her why she was vego and she said it was because she felt that killing animals for our own unnecasary culinary pleasure was immoral and because we should be equals with animals. However, that technically means that she values the lives of chicken and fish less than other animals which means that she is not equal with animals.
She wanted to become vegan until we pointed out that chocolate would be a no-no.
I think that it is nice to be vegatarian if that turns your wheels but I'm personally a meat-eater. I agree with what has been previously agreed, nature made us omnivores so omnivore is what I am.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:56 am
Pulling up this thread. biggrin
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:27 pm
i try my best to be a vegatarian, but it doesn't really work out because all i we is beef. Well i eat very little beef.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 3:00 pm
Clally She wanted to become vegan until we pointed out that chocolate would be a no-no. Chocolate can be vegan - the dark, non-dairy variety. biggrin
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:45 pm
Badgerkin Clally She wanted to become vegan until we pointed out that chocolate would be a no-no. Chocolate can be vegan - the dark, non-dairy variety. biggrin There's also soy chocolate too; sometimes it's called vegan chocolate. My friend's allergic to lactose and eats that. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 4:46 pm
omg I remember making this thread xD
Has anyone heard of Kyoto Geisha? An old member? He hasn't been on in like 2years, and she was the one that introduced me to this thread! And I just noticed what highschool she wanted to get into, and I live in the area! it's so weird...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:13 pm
rikuHEART No, I am not. I love other animals and all, but I believe in trying to be as close as nature as one can get. Nature created me as a human, and humans are omnivores. So I am an omnivore, but I try to eat meat that has only been decently produced (free range and wild stuff). Im with RikuHEART
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 12:13 pm
kab00dl3z rikuHEART No, I am not. I love other animals and all, but I believe in trying to be as close as nature as one can get. Nature created me as a human, and humans are omnivores. So I am an omnivore, but I try to eat meat that has only been decently produced (free range and wild stuff). Im with RikuHEART Read through some of the more informative posts here before you make up your mind. There are a lot of interesting and very convincing opinions in this thread that have made me change my mind since. wink
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:17 pm
I am not but have been thinking of trying it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 4:13 pm
I only read the first few posts here, and I have some strong arguements. "Free-range" can mean anything. Anything. "Free-range" eggs were probably gotten in the exact same way as other eggs. There are no standards as to what it has to mean. Humans are NOT meant to eat meat. In our case, it is not part of a cycle to be eating any part of any animal. This can be proven in multiple ways. First of all, humans only started eating meat when they made weapons. They have no attack of themselves. Owls, eagles, and other birds of prey have sharp talons and beaks. Felines have sharp claws and teeth along with speed and precision. Humans only have dull teeth, made for eating vegetables, fruits, and greenery. If you look at this picture of a cow jaw, you will see its teeth that are strikingly similar to humans' teeth. Square and dull. Cows do not eat meat of any sort unless it is forced upon them. Now, look at this Fox Terrier's teeth. They are sharp and long, perfect for sinking into another animal. Fox Terriers are hunting dogs. Coinsodence? I think not. Secondly, a lot of people are lactose intolerant, including me. This is because our stomachs are not designed to digest the milk of another species. Cow's milk, something usually eaten for breakfast, is meant for baby cows. Not cows, not humans, not baby humans. Baby cows. You'll never see a cow older than one year nursing. And in nature, you will rarely even see a baby that a mother of another species adopted and nurses. Third, meat is unhealthy. If you have been eating meat all of your life, and become a vegetarian for even a week or two, you'll see a dramatic difference in your health for the better. Then, if you go back to eating meat, you'll probably feel sick from eating it. Maybe then you will realise that meat is bad for you. I also just would like to say that if you eat meat, you should stop or quit this guild, because factory farms produce more air and water pollution than anything in this world. Even if you recycle all that you can, you don't waste water, and buy organic things, eating meat will cancel it all out.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 12:34 am
It's difficult to say whether or not humans truly are "meant" to eat meat, depending on your definition of "human" - whether it's Homo sapiens sapiens or Australopithecus afarensis. Our oldest known ancestor, the latter, could have been an herbivore, but Washington State University says "omnivorous." Columbia University states that "scientists are sure that Homo erectus [a later, closer ancestor] hunted." So by the time Homo sapiens sapiens was a separate species we had already created weapons and fed off of other animals.
As for the teeth argument, we do have incisors. We have teeth that can chew on meat, even if they are less specialized than carnivores'. They've dulled and shortened since the utilization of fire, since that makes the meat easier to chew.
And yes, a lot of people are lactose intolerant, but a lot more people aren't. Less than 30% of Americans are allergic to lactose. (source; ctrl+f and type in "lactose") Just because some people don't produce enough lactate doesn't mean that the entire species isn't "meant" to digest cow's milk.
I partly agree with your statement on "free range." The USDA says, "Producers must demonstrate to the Agency that the poultry has been allowed access to the outside." So yes, there are standards, but it could mean that the chicken/turkey/whatever was only allowed into the open area once in its entire life. =SKnittingKnerd Third, meat is unhealthy. If you have been eating meat all of your life, and become a vegetarian for even a week or two, you'll see a dramatic difference in your health for the better. Then, if you go back to eating meat, you'll probably feel sick from eating it. Maybe then you will realise that meat is bad for you. I've heard that claim a lot, but fail to understand it. Meat provides huge amounts of protein and B12. Yes, you can get those from other sources of food, but that doesn't mean that meat is unhealthy. Do you have a source?KnittingKnerd factory farms produce more air and water pollution than anything in this world. Even if you recycle all that you can, you don't waste water, and buy organic things, eating meat will cancel it all out. ...Source please? sweatdrop Please don't get me wrong, it's not like I'm against vegetarianism...I just don't completely agree with all of your reasons for being vegetarian.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 6:22 pm
Arh, you make me so mad! Meat has some healthy parts of it, because the animal ate health foods! And you think that about 30% is not a significant number? 30% of rabbits are not allergic to carrots. Speaking of rabbits, their teeth are sharp for biting into hard vegetables. They don't. eat. meat! My main source is Peta, I don't need to list the dozens of other ones. And another reason for being a vegetarian, have you seen the way the animals are killed?! If you've ever eaten at KFC, I declare you an indirect murderer, because you are paying for chickens to be drugged, beaten, boiled alive, and sometimes, raped!!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:56 am
KnittingKnerd Arh, you make me so mad! Meat has some healthy parts of it, because the animal ate health foods! And you think that about 30% is not a significant number? 30% of rabbits are not allergic to carrots. Speaking of rabbits, their teeth are sharp for biting into hard vegetables. They don't. eat. meat! My main source is Peta, I don't need to list the dozens of other ones. And another reason for being a vegetarian, have you seen the way the animals are killed?! If you've ever eaten at KFC, I declare you an indirect murderer, because you are paying for chickens to be drugged, beaten, boiled alive, and sometimes, raped!! Sorry for frustrating you - that was not my intention. And by no means am I saying that meat is absolutely essential to one's diet - of course you can find all the nutrients you get from meat in other foods, but that doesn't mean that meat's bad for you either and that if you go vegetarian for a week you'll feel loads better. And I agree - 30% is a significant number, but if 30% of the American population is allergic to some kind of food, that means 70% isn't. 70% is a far more significant number, and therefore we can't assume that the entire human species doesn't have the correctly designed stomach to drink the milk of another species.
Yes, you have a good point about the rabbits. But my argument isn't so much centralized around teeth so much as what we're "meant" to eat. In your argument you mention, "Humans are NOT meant to eat meat." Yet most anthropologists will tell you that humans have been eating meat since the very beginning of our species, and even beyond. I'm simply stating that yes, we biologically are omnivores. Whether you follow that diet or not is up to you.
And sorry, for me at least, PETA doesn't make it. It's an organization with noble intentions but biased information, since they enthusiastically support vegetarianism. Any organization, however successful or loved, will only tell you information that will make you support them. For me at least I usually try to find sources from university studies or the government so that it's not as one-sided, or I look up information from one side and look at what the other side has to say about it too. wink On that last point you have there I do agree with you 100%. We kill these animals atrociously in slaughterhouses and treat them no better while raising them. It's for that reason alone that I'm considering vegetarianism. I repeat that I by no means am against a vegetarian diet - I simply don't agree with all the points that you made.
Hope I didn't make you angry again. Dx
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:22 am
PeTA fails science and biology on SO many levels, it's even not funny. Every time I think about half the things they claim I want to wring their necks. In fact, I'd have to say there is no appreciable difference between PeTA and a young earth creationist "scientist." Both will repeat total balony over and over until they're blue in the face because they can prop their dogma with it.
Furthermore, if the way animals are killed by meat producers (which I do NOT approve of), I entreat you to think about how insects and other animals such as mice, gophers, snakes, and rats suffer in the fields. These creatures are crushed, mutilated, poisoned and trapped - just so you can eat your veggies. Most people aren't interested in taking videos of bugs writhing after exposure to pesticides. Imagine yourself famished one day, and you suddenly discover a delicious, inviting buffet set out. You dig in - a few minutes later your stomach starts to churn. You collapse to the floor in spasms. It might be ten minutes to half and hour before you actually die.
Organic isn't "cruelty-free," either: organic gardeners use their share of poisons and traps, too. One remedy for slugs is to scatter out crushed eggshells or diatomaceous earth. This stops the slugs by shredding their soft little bodies as they crawl over it. Everywhere you go, you'll find organic gardeners advocating the famous dishsoap spray, which kills bugs by dissolving their exoskeleton. Humane, huh? Indeed, imagine yourself at that buffet, then some chump comes along and sprays you with something that dissolves your skin right off your body.
If people were doing these things to cute little bunnies instead of ugly old aphids, mites, locusts, and earwigs, there would be an outrage.
Okay, that said, I do not approve of unnecessary cruelty to animals in the slaughtering process. It's quite sad to see what a mess that livestock production has turned into.
Also, I am not a vegetarian, and am unlikely to ever be. I am not the sort of person whose body takes well to that sort of thing for a number of reasons. For one, my ancestors were Germanic hunters. If there's one thing genetic research has shown, it's that different races of humans have evolved in subtle ways to adapt to their local diets. For example, Asians have more copies of a gene that allows them to digest carbohydrates. On the other hand, those descended from hunters tend to have problems when they switch to an agrarian's diet.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 4:12 pm
I guess you have a point, Peta is pretty one-sided, but they don't just make up their information. It says right in that video I linked to that the UN has realised meat production is the number one producer of CO2 in the atmosphere, as seen here. And, I just read the previous posts, and I guess I was being pretty arguementative... I was kind of, uh, PMSing at the time. sweatdrop So, sorry.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|