|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spottedteddybears Vice Captain
|
 Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:19 pm
You can feel free to "let go" of me. I feel really guilty since I never post, haha.
Leigh will return as a guest once in a while, but she definitely won't be a regular. ><;;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:10 pm
I think some new "hosts" for the cafe' need to be enstated so they can make changes if necessary so we don't run into some of the issues we've had previously: Rooms not be updated
Titles left as being Halloween Event for months afterwords
Plot changes [mini events, whatever you want to call them] need to be more fluid and people on schedule so there is no conflict or confusion
etc. I would like to participate again, even if its not as Molly or a member of staff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 10:28 pm
I think I should be let go. I'm distracted by a lot of things at the moment. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:17 pm
iNk_mAy I think some new "hosts" for the cafe' need to be enstated so they can make changes if necessary so we don't run into some of the issues we've had previously: Rooms not be updated
Titles left as being Halloween Event for months afterwords
Plot changes [mini events, whatever you want to call them] need to be more fluid and people on schedule so there is no conflict or confusion
etc. I would like to participate again, even if its not as Molly or a member of staff. That's why I'm stepping up smile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spottedteddybears Vice Captain
|
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:25 pm
Robayn iNk_mAy I think some new "hosts" for the cafe' need to be enstated so they can make changes if necessary so we don't run into some of the issues we've had previously: Rooms not be updated
Titles left as being Halloween Event for months afterwords
Plot changes [mini events, whatever you want to call them] need to be more fluid and people on schedule so there is no conflict or confusion
etc. I would like to participate again, even if its not as Molly or a member of staff. That's why I'm stepping up smile
Are you going to contact Moo about it? Like, I know he'd be back for Christmas and all, but like... Yeah.
i don't even know what I'm saying.
You could get Chibi to shoot him an email. (:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:28 pm
Oh Inky, please stay Molly! Molly is awesome! heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:39 pm
I don't think that this is worth sending him an email while he's on tour with the Coast Guard :/
Spottedteddybears Robayn iNk_mAy I think some new "hosts" for the cafe' need to be enstated so they can make changes if necessary so we don't run into some of the issues we've had previously: Rooms not be updated Titles left as being Halloween Event for months afterwords Plot changes [mini events, whatever you want to call them] need to be more fluid and people on schedule so there is no conflict or confusion etc. I would like to participate again, even if its not as Molly or a member of staff. That's why I'm stepping up smile
Are you going to contact Moo about it? Like, I know he'd be back for Christmas and all, but like... Yeah.
i don't even know what I'm saying.
You could get Chibi to shoot him an email. (:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:13 pm
I'd like to ask opinions:
As being relatively new to the RP (because I haven't posted) I am going ask a very naive question so feel free to correct my thinking and suggestion... what would you say to having only a few rooms taken by thread moderators (Moo, Myself, and certain staff who are designated to moderate [answer questions, notify for updates, enforce rules, etc.]) and the rest open for guests to take?
Anyone who's RP'd having a room so far wouldn't lose their room, but if there's someone who hasn't actually "used" their room in the RP then it wouldn't mess with the RP if they didn't actually live at the cafe. I mean.. I work at a store that is under a hotel IRL but I don't live at the hotel.
Too complicated to change this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:59 pm
Well, I really wanna keep my room. Oh and I'm bringing in a new account to play Rinka. My sister's old account that doubles as my mule. 4laugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:05 pm
I thought it strange that so many rooms were taken up by staff to the extent that it was difficult for guests to get them. I know the one room listed as "open" in the front page was given out to a guest, but I don't know who. Yesterday I became the third guest to get a room. The staff that gave one one said that rooms are supposed to be available to guests even if it means that rooms have to be pulled out of thin air to give them one. If there is a problem, it is that not all staff seem to be in the loop to the extent of thinking that the handful of rooms [mostly taken up by staff] are all their is such that more rooms cannot be created... or more accurately, different staff are enforcing different sets of rules about what guests can/cannot do. Robayn I'd like to ask opinions: As being relatively new to the RP (because I haven't posted) I am going ask a very naive question so feel free to correct my thinking and suggestion... what would you say to having only a few rooms taken by thread moderators (Moo, Myself, and certain staff who are designated to moderate [answer questions, notify for updates, enforce rules, etc.]) and the rest open for guests to take? Anyone who's RP'd having a room so far wouldn't lose their room, but if there's someone who hasn't actually "used" their room in the RP then it wouldn't mess with the RP if they didn't actually live at the cafe. I mean.. I work at a store that is under a hotel IRL but I don't live at the hotel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:05 pm
I really want to keep mine too. Natalie's technically just a guest, as she doesn't work for the cafe, I RP in there a lot... sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:31 pm
True, we don't have a maximum number of rooms, but it keeps things neat and tidy if we don't have an extremely long list of rooms. If there are people with rooms who aren't active then the rooms don't need to be occupied.
Sachie Whitby I thought it strange that so many rooms were taken up by staff to the extent that it was difficult for guests to get them. I know the one room listed as "open" in the front page was given out to a guest, but I don't know who. Yesterday I became the third guest to get a room. The staff that gave one one said that rooms are supposed to be available to guests even if it means that rooms have to be pulled out of thin air to give them one. If there is a problem, it is that not all staff seem to be in the loop to the extent of thinking that the handful of rooms [mostly taken up by staff] are all their is such that more rooms cannot be created... or more accurately, different staff are enforcing different sets of rules about what guests can/cannot do. Robayn I'd like to ask opinions: As being relatively new to the RP (because I haven't posted) I am going ask a very naive question so feel free to correct my thinking and suggestion... what would you say to having only a few rooms taken by thread moderators (Moo, Myself, and certain staff who are designated to moderate [answer questions, notify for updates, enforce rules, etc.]) and the rest open for guests to take? Anyone who's RP'd having a room so far wouldn't lose their room, but if there's someone who hasn't actually "used" their room in the RP then it wouldn't mess with the RP if they didn't actually live at the cafe. I mean.. I work at a store that is under a hotel IRL but I don't live at the hotel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:38 pm
Maybe there can be a small note at the end of the list saying something like Vacant rooms are always available! Only rooms that are taken are actually listed. Maybe even mix up room numbers a bit so that it doesn't look like everyone is just clustered together. Robayn
True, we don't have a maximum number of rooms, but it keeps things neat and tidy if we don't have an extremely long list of rooms. If there are people with rooms who aren't active then the rooms don't need to be occupied.
Sachie Whitby I thought it strange that so many rooms were taken up by staff to the extent that it was difficult for guests to get them. I know the one room listed as "open" in the front page was given out to a guest, but I don't know who. Yesterday I became the third guest to get a room. The staff that gave one one said that rooms are supposed to be available to guests even if it means that rooms have to be pulled out of thin air to give them one. If there is a problem, it is that not all staff seem to be in the loop to the extent of thinking that the handful of rooms [mostly taken up by staff] are all their is such that more rooms cannot be created... or more accurately, different staff are enforcing different sets of rules about what guests can/cannot do. Robayn I'd like to ask opinions: As being relatively new to the RP (because I haven't posted) I am going ask a very naive question so feel free to correct my thinking and suggestion... what would you say to having only a few rooms taken by thread moderators (Moo, Myself, and certain staff who are designated to moderate [answer questions, notify for updates, enforce rules, etc.]) and the rest open for guests to take? Anyone who's RP'd having a room so far wouldn't lose their room, but if there's someone who hasn't actually "used" their room in the RP then it wouldn't mess with the RP if they didn't actually live at the cafe. I mean.. I work at a store that is under a hotel IRL but I don't live at the hotel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:46 pm
I've updated both the rules and faq to explain how rooms are gotten and the rooms post itself is now explaining who gets rooms and how they get them smile
Also any rooms that were previously occupied by someone who did not post in reply to my quotes last week when I began editing the thread have been emptied and are not available for guests.
Sachie Whitby Maybe there can be a small note at the end of the list saying something like Vacant rooms are always available! Only rooms that are taken are actually listed. Maybe even mix up room numbers a bit so that it doesn't look like everyone is just clustered together. Robayn
True, we don't have a maximum number of rooms, but it keeps things neat and tidy if we don't have an extremely long list of rooms. If there are people with rooms who aren't active then the rooms don't need to be occupied.
Sachie Whitby I thought it strange that so many rooms were taken up by staff to the extent that it was difficult for guests to get them. I know the one room listed as "open" in the front page was given out to a guest, but I don't know who. Yesterday I became the third guest to get a room. The staff that gave one one said that rooms are supposed to be available to guests even if it means that rooms have to be pulled out of thin air to give them one. If there is a problem, it is that not all staff seem to be in the loop to the extent of thinking that the handful of rooms [mostly taken up by staff] are all their is such that more rooms cannot be created... or more accurately, different staff are enforcing different sets of rules about what guests can/cannot do. Robayn I'd like to ask opinions: As being relatively new to the RP (because I haven't posted) I am going ask a very naive question so feel free to correct my thinking and suggestion... what would you say to having only a few rooms taken by thread moderators (Moo, Myself, and certain staff who are designated to moderate [answer questions, notify for updates, enforce rules, etc.]) and the rest open for guests to take? Anyone who's RP'd having a room so far wouldn't lose their room, but if there's someone who hasn't actually "used" their room in the RP then it wouldn't mess with the RP if they didn't actually live at the cafe. I mean.. I work at a store that is under a hotel IRL but I don't live at the hotel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:54 pm
Robayn
I've updated both the rules and faq to explain how rooms are gotten and the rooms post itself is now explaining who gets rooms and how they get them smile
Also any rooms that were previously occupied by someone who did not post in reply to my quotes last week when I began editing the thread have been emptied and are not available for guests.
May I get one? Or should I edit my posts to go back to freeloading?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
