|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 5:54 am
Well, not a very promising bunch, lemme tell ya that. Lemme start:
Midoriko Angel: He just doesn't cut it. We can debate about anything in this guild. Sure, the main topic is sex and the like, but this is a guiuld with people, not robots, and deviation may occur, is permitted, and hell, I encourage it, since intellectuals can speak about many many things, and that's what I had in mind, intellectuals who have something in common: there love for the erotic. He lacks enough common sense to know this, yet he thinks of himself as a phylosopher.
We aren't "just horny perverted nerds", and honestly, she/he's not too bright if he/she thinks that. In fact, reading the thing just pissed me the hell off, and you should ask anyone that knows me, that's hard. I wouldn't want him in the guild anyway. Too pompous in my eyes.
[.Dark.Mischevious.]: He speaks for himself, really, but I'll break it apart. The reason he gets a "Nay" from me isn't his stance on abortion, as he can just not discuss that. It's his stance on music. I mean, if he didn't know, then he could've said it, but no. He decided to gun it anyway.
This little quote was a doozy:
SacrBoy I don't think they are because its like just acting and they aren't really doing it
To the members and non-members reading this: Look, I don't need rocket scientists, I've said this before. I only want a guild comprised of people who can discuss, debate and think, yet have a light side, a sense of humor and a taste for the frowned upon. Kinda like the perverted side of MENSA, but not nearly as smart. Is that too much to ask? Yeesh, I'm about the pick the worst candidate and let him in, just to change it up. Maybe the others will wise up? Maybe...
Anyway, I'm gonna pick a member to interview, so wish me luck!*Points at screen with eyes closed, finger landing on "Ninja Taco"* Oh boy....
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:14 am
I support the idea to interview Ninja Taco. I adore her and have spoken to her many times.
If anyone can get ahold of The b***h D, would you please interview her? I most likely will be without the internet this weekend....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:48 am
Well thats why we have this process, to make sure we don't get any people like them in our guild, and so we can stop them before they can really effect us. and why has no one said anything about Malignant Spirit? I think he's waitng on us...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:02 am
Koiyuki Well thats why we have this process, to make sure we don't get any people like them in our guild, and so we can stop them before they can really effect us. and why has no one said anything about Malignant Spirit? I think he's waitng on us... MS? Where was his post?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:07 am
4th page of the yay or nay topic. Go lookie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:13 am
I did and you really need to put down some ground rules with people voting here Koi. I am sick of people basing their opinions on whether they agree with the person or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:16 am
Angyles Cerddoriaeth I did and you really need to put down some ground rules with people voting here Koi. I am sick of people basing their opinions on whether they agree with the person or not. On it, Chief.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:18 am
I also think we need to fix the way we have the voting. It is getting very cluttered with different interviews. I know it would be a pain to create a new thread for each person, but can we only vote on one person at a time? It might slow us down a bit, but might be much clearer and easier to understand.
I would love to have one thread for each canidate personally. We can stickie it and then remove it when we have voted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:25 am
Angyles Cerddoriaeth I also think we need to fix the way we have the voting. It is getting very cluttered with different interviews. I know it would be a pain to create a new thread for each person, but can we only vote on one person at a time? It might slow us down a bit, but might be much clearer and easier to understand. I would love to have one thread for each canidate personally. We can stickie it and then remove it when we have voted. Yeah, i think that'd be a good idea. We'll start doing that with the new candidates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:39 am
So we will have a new thread for each one? Or only vote on one at a time?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:42 am
I think a thread for each one wil do nicely. What do you think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:44 am
I would prefer it. I think it is easier, plus they are all separated and each person can have the attention their application deserves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:49 am
Yes yes. And if we get many nays, then we know what to do then, eh? ^_~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:52 am
exclaim How about we create a recruiting thread like Enki's? We let them in, we watch them chat, interject a topic every once in a while, and then we have our pick of the litter. What do you say?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:53 am
I think I'd rather have everyone vote on one candidate at a time. It's a bit slower than what we currently have, but faster than individual threads...
On another note, Koiyuki, I'll be ready to have Cap'nship by the 15th of next month. I'll be more available by that time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
