|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:17 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:58 pm
I just interviewed Lavaske, and this is what I got: Lavaske chikushou Lavaske chikushou Hello, I'm chikushou, and I will be doing your interview for acceptance into the Intellectual Perverts Guild. Please let me know when would be the best time for you, or we can just start this as it is, replying whenever we do. Anytime is fine for me, really. So go ahead and start things off when you'd like. Okay. Just to let you know, unless you specify a certain topic which you wish to discuss, I will simply be pulling random questions that come into my mind. There has been a recent movement in America for the teaching of Intelligent Design as a theory in Biology classes. Should this theory be taught as a part of science? Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory. It has no cause and effect relationship, or any possible way to prove it. Thus, it should not be taught in a science class. Even as a disclaimer, it is very difficult to put intelligent design in without a religious spin. Everybody would want their god, or gods, explained. Students would spend an excessive amount of time learning about reincarnation, Adam and Eve, and how aliens put us on Earth. This, undoubtably, would offend the Christian right, who is currently trying to push this ideal into science. However, arguing against evolution in the classroom would be a good thing. By highlighting flaws, unanswered questions, and errors in data, so as to allow students to logically doubt the class, it would help students understand the scientific process in debunking other's ideas! By the way, did you happen to catch The Daily Show's week long special on 'evolution shmevolution'? I didn't see a reason to go further, as he essentially covered very good points ver quickly, and seems to be a good fit. Do we have any other yays?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 11:24 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 4:33 am
The Cap'n is pleased with this "Lavaske" fellow. The Intelliperv is strong in this one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 6:19 pm
CactusTTB Hey im new to gaia and i saw a sig with your guild it. Read the rules and guidelines and i think i fit the profile. Read and tell me what you think. I actually write this kind of stuff for a website called the fake internet that i advertise for in my signature on here, so im lucky i found you guys lol. Anyway, enjoy! Abortion, its been called disgusting, murder, sometimes even tasty. But who really can judge a person for killing a tiny peanut inside of a womans uterus? Ive been exploring a both sides of the abortion debate and ive found that not one side makes any real point. Conservative's believe that all children that have been concieved, must be brought into this world, even if it means a life of forster homes and beatings for the child to be. Liberal's believe that women should be able to walk into a building and have the life literally sucked out of them, for a small fee of $500. But whos side should you take, in this heated battle between religion VS god's given right to destroy life? Ill be telling which side to take in this huge article im attempting to write proffesionally, because lets face it, if CNN puts blogs on their live news boradcasts, something good must be coming out of them. The biggest question poking everyones genitals in this war of words is this; "If a baby was made, should it be ok to poke it with a stick, spin it around for a bit, and then yank it out the womans v****a?". In my very biased opinion, i say yes, its the womans choice, let her feel better about not having to bring a b*****d child into this world. But some people diagree. Some people, we like to call these people "Idiots" and/or "Religious Groups", disagree, saying "It is wrong for a child to be, to be robbed of its right to live in this world, simply because the woman doesnt want it". This would be true, however im not listening, therefor they cant make any valid points to me, which means i wont be voting yes on their propositions to ban gay marraige... I seem to have strayed off topic. Let me get back to my original point. ORGANIZED RELIGION IS RUINING OUR COUNTRY! I mean since when is it wrong to kill someone? Christians and Catholics have been voting yes for years on all bills passed to raise the death penalty from "Excrutiating Pain" to "Gut him like a fish and use his own entrails as a noose". How can they find it appalling that a lady wouldnt want to bring a child into this world (especially at ages 15-19). This world is filled with horrible things, like Jesus, Muggings, Baptism, Youth Groups, and more! I cant even continue to mention the other 2,796 things i just pulled out of my a**. According to my editor, im not aloud to be biased in this argument of Religion VS Hoover Vacuums in a womans vaginal cavity. So i must refrain from bashing on the conservatives, or as they are now refered to in my new language, "Cuntsurveyors". So now i guess ill throw some pro's to the c**t's argument out there. They do make one good point in all of their babbling and nay-saying, which is of course; "Jesus wouldnt approve". He probably wouldnt. I mean comeon, using modern day house old appliances to pull a living being out of a woman? Thats horrible! He would have probably preffered the original tool; A coat hanger. ... Quite frankly, I'm speechless. What do the rest of you think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2005 11:45 pm
Err...don't seem to hit upon many points. Just seems toi have an opinion, and not much backing it up. Nay from me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 5:42 am
And too narrowminded. They've spent a while saying "I'm not going to listen to you, just insult you!" Nay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2005 6:50 pm
Holy hell they scare me. Like c'mon they even go as far to say:"Abortion, its been called disgusting, murder, sometimes even tasty." What. The. ********.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 6:29 am
At first, I thought sarcasm was being used. But, damn, this is a bit much. No tact, no taste and no finnesse(SP?). Nowhere on this post has been shown an open mind, the primary thing we look for. And, even if it were sarcasm, where's the humor?
I disagree with abortion, but "Idiot", "conservative", "Religious group" and/or "Cuntsurveyor" I am not. The "original" point made no real sense, even if he did have some leverage in the death penalty subject. Nay from the Cap'n, access denied.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 8:39 am
Here's another PM interview: Telekant Yuko Yamiyama Telekant Yuko Yamiyama Telekant Yuko Yamiyama Alright, so what are your interests? Anything mathematical, debatable, or whatever I find non boring. Alright, so what do you think of Gov't spending, and what should it be put tpwards, and why? Government spending. A fun question. I think it's pretty much wasted carelessly, trying to support the war in Iraq and all that. It's things like that that puts this country in a National Debt. Here's what it should be focused on: Katrina slaughtered Louisiana and that state (especially New Orleans) needs financial assistance for recovery (and so that people can finally hush up about the catastrophe). Next there are the elderly that complain about medical assistance and how they need medicine and all that, that's one thing that could be focused on. How about national security being another thing that the government should be spending on, since it's the only thing protecting us here and that they are begining to ignore with their slaughter in Iraq. I think that should do it for government spending. And why should they stop spending on the War? For every action, there is an opposite reaction. More spending on the war may continue to hurt us financially. For an example, gas prices increased by an average of a buck per gallon. This can soon become a problem of its own, since for a ten gallon tank car for $3 per gallon is costing $30 overall. Contiuous purchases may increase the prices of it to the extent where gasoline can become a luxury, and those who can't afford it will not be able to move from point A to point B. Jobs are usually at risk with these things and a depression is just knocking at our door. Now, another thing they need to stop paying is the price of sacrafices. They just place troops there just to watch the citizens, making them open targets for car bombings and such. Now, Bush is saying that he has an idea to do something, but that can go downhill quickly. Besides, we have had no reason to be there except for some claim about how Sudam may have weapons of mass destruction, which experts can proove wrong now. Whatever happened to Afghanistan. If it wasn't for morals, I should say just finish off the problems for good and nuke it. Why cut off limbs of the problem when you can just cut down the whole thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:57 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 6:45 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 9:14 pm
KitsyTheFoxDemon Thanks, here goes. My Essay is to be about Abortion. I believe that abortion is disgusting. It is definately murder of innocent and helpless babies, no, fetuses, which makes it even worse than just murder. I think abortion should be outlawed for so many reasons. The only time when abortion should be legal is in the case of sexual assault or rape. Hundreds of unborn children are slaughtered every year. Not for the reason that most people would think. Its not because some sicko is out there killing pregnant women, no, its because some slut thinks, 'Oh no. I'm pregnant because I was sleeping around when I shouldn't have been. I think I'll get an abortion and kill the baby because I was stupid.' The practice of abortion is disgusting and I find it against everything that so many people stand for. Everyone is disgusted when someone kills a baby. They see it on the news, and go into an outrage. Yet so many women get abortions every year, and nobody really knows. Just because a doctor does it, does that make it right? Does it? The best thing if you don't want to get pregnant is abstinence, but condoms and birth control are almost as good. Please don't end a life before it begins. Don't support abortion, don't get pregnant until you're ready. Thanks, and I hope it wasn't too long or repetative. KitsyTheFoxDemon Hmm...seems a bit too closed minded for my liking. Doesn't really show the other options someone has besides abortion, she just seems to be saying its wrong and disgusting. I wouldn't let her in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2005 9:20 pm
Bleh. Closed minded conservatives are NOT what the IPG needs. Nay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2005 4:55 am
I agree, there's more to it than just it being disgustng. I disagree, but I have no say in it, being a man and all. Abortions sadden me, but, hey, I'm not going to call somebody a murderer. If they did it with a clean conscience, well that's that. Telekant gets my approval, though. Access granted for telekant. Does Kitsy have two nays or is Yuko directly giving a nay?
On a side note, PeachyKeenTastic will be let in without the processes, since Stevothehuman is vouching for her. Is that ok?
That is fine. If a member can vouch for another, then its all good. And yes, Yuko did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
