|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2005 4:18 pm
Meh, I enjoy being a hypocrite. It's easier that way. xp
But alas, I will look into this when I'm actually up to writing. Though, PETA would be my group at the moment, since there's too many Right-Wing Christian's that get way into a tizzy, and they get their mention in my next article on not having the right to impose your ethics on others. Besides, PETA sprays people's coats. Then again, I could add the Sierra Club. I thourghly get annoyed by their constant mailings. Especially their latest send our hate to Bush campaign.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2005 7:50 pm
Jahoclave Meh, I enjoy being a hypocrite. It's easier that way. xp But alas, I will look into this when I'm actually up to writing. Though, PETA would be my group at the moment, since there's too many Right-Wing Christian's that get way into a tizzy, and they get their mention in my next article on not having the right to impose your ethics on others. Besides, PETA sprays people's coats. Then again, I could add the Sierra Club. I thourghly get annoyed by their constant mailings. Especially their latest send our hate to Bush campaign. Hahaha, you lazy bum. That's fine though, lol. I think what you have right now is already publish-worthy - it's just my job to be super snarky as the editor, alas - so anyway! Thanks for being so prompt with your columns! wink In the meantime, we'll be looking forward to your next installment. *salutes*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 3:22 pm
Well hopefully I'll have both the edit and the new column done tonight. Though it's funny how my newest column goes right along with the recent happenings over at keenspot. I've always been amased at how pissed off people get when somebody does something that has absolutly no effect on them. Hell, I'd remove a picture of two guys kissing simply because I don't like to look at things like that. It'd be the same as if it were two ugly people.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 6:44 pm
[ Message temporarily off-line ]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:11 pm
The revision looks great! The ending is much better. Just the right amount of preach and cheek, lol. And I'll get around to reading your newest column after the second issue is released. wink Hehe, you're just a regular mean, green, writing machine. I love it, lol! *hands out gold star*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:16 pm
Yeah, something like that...
Ooohh, shiny gold star. *follows around*
Other than that, I'll be taking my leave for my little visit up to Drake tommorow. Though, most of my school projects are done, or near done. And hopefully I'll place calculus on that placement test next week, otherwise I'll be pissed to hell. (Lets just say our school's calc teacher can't teach worth s**t, and I'd actually like to learn calculus) After that I should be good to go on my writing. Unless some stupid teacher decides I need yet another project to waste my life with.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:15 pm
Just thought this read like soemthing you'd be interested in. Quote: From Harry Frankfurt's "On Bullshit" essay. One of the most salient features of our culture is that there is so much bullshit. Everyone knows this. Each of us contributes his share. But we tend to take the situation for granted. Most people are rather confident of their ability to recognize bullshit and to avoid being taken in by it. So the phenomenon has not aroused much deliberate concern, or attracted much sustained inquiry. In consequence, we have no clear understanding of what bullshit is, why there is so much of it, or what functions it serves. Telling a lie is an act with a sharp focus. It is designed to insert a particular falsehood at a specific point in a set or system of beliefs, in order to avoid the consequences of having that point occupied by the truth. In order to invent a lie at all, he must think he knows what is true. And in order to invent an effective lie, he must design his falsehood under the guidance of that truth. On the other hand, a person who undertakes to bullshit his way through has much more freedom. His focus is panoramic rather than particular. He does not limit himself to inserting a certain falsehood at a specific point, and thus he is not constrained by the truths surrounding that point or intersecting it. It is impossible for someone to lie unless he thinks he knows the truth. Producing bullshit requires no such conviction. A person who lies is thereby responding to the truth, and he is to that extent respectful of it. When an honest man speaks, he says only what he believes to be true; and for the liar, it is correspondingly indispensable that he considers his statements to be false. For the bullshitter, however, all these bets are off: he is neither on the side of the true nor on the side of the false. His eye is not on the facts at all, as the eyes of the honest man and of the liar are, except insofar as they may be pertinent to his interest in getting away with what he says. Bullshitting is not exactly lying, and bullshit remains bullshit whether it's true or false. The difference lies in the bullshitter's complete disregard for whether what he's saying corresponds to facts in the physical world. He does not reject the authority of the truth, as the liar does, and oppose himself to it. He pays no attention to it at all. By virtue of this, bullshit is a greater enemy of the truth than lies are.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 8:28 pm
Was there something in here that you would like me to look through for grammar and punctuation errors? Which one(s)?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 9:22 pm
Well, the last two haven't been used yet. So those two are still up for fair game. Which reminds me, I really do need to finish my literary criticism of See Spot Run for the next column.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:01 pm
Bethany Hodgins Well, the last two haven't been used yet. So those two are still up for fair game. Which reminds me, I really do need to finish my literary criticism of See Spot Run for the next column. No way! Jahoclave??? Ahahaha, you have pink hair! heart heart heart I LOVE IT!!! *huggles The Clave*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 3:50 pm
thepress Bethany Hodgins Well, the last two haven't been used yet. So those two are still up for fair game. Which reminds me, I really do need to finish my literary criticism of See Spot Run for the next column. No way! Jahoclave??? Ahahaha, you have pink hair! heart heart heart I LOVE IT!!! *huggles The Clave* I have what now? You're color blind right?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:17 pm
[ Message temporarily off-line ]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:08 pm
[ Message temporarily off-line ]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:17 pm
Sorry for the symbols in place of the apostophys. I didn't use word this time. I actualy edited it in the reply post. My comp hates me.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 2:02 pm
Gypsy_Hart Sorry for the symbols in place of the apostophys. I didn't use word this time. I actualy edited it in the reply post. My comp hates me. Don't worry, changing character encoding takes all of two seconds. But if you want something really sad. All those little explanations you gave... That's more explaining than I've had in 11 years of school.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|