|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 2:38 pm
Well, I apologized for attacking her just for her siggy icon.... >.>
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 2:48 pm
I agree with twilight_is_for_idiots on this one, and I praise his moderate take regarding this. Though yes, it's blasphemous, we should probably simmer down some. It's free speech, it's her stupid fandom-influenced opinion, and we're in no place to do anything about it. God willing she'll grow out of it on her own, yes? Just like how twitard's jeers fail to influence us at all, no amount of witty insults is gonna change that kid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 2:56 pm
koolkitty752 I agree with twilight_is_for_idiots on this one, and I praise his moderate take regarding this. Though yes, it's blasphemous, we should probably simmer down some. It's free speech, it's her stupid fandom-influenced opinion, and we're in no place to do anything about it. God willing she'll grow out of it on her own, yes? Just like how twitard's jeers fail to influence us at all, no amount of witty insults is gonna change that kid. The behavior of the guild members in this situation only harms us as a whole. Because of a few self-entitled twits we now look as rabid and narrow-minded as a fangirls we are against. How do WE feel when a Twitard tells us to go die, or that they hope we get beaten up, or that they as a Twilight fan believe their are entitled to push their Pro-Twilight beliefs on us? Not very good I imagine. So why would we sink to their level?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:00 pm
She changed her signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:08 pm
Jerba She changed her signature. Damn shame too. As much as I dislike Twilight, she should have the right to express herself without fearing attack. How much do you want to bet this ugly story gets back to one of the Twilight guilds? They're already oh-so fond of us. -_-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 7:26 pm
Jerba She changed her signature. I missed it. What did her signature say before?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 10:04 pm
kat__NiSS - - x Jerba She changed her signature. I missed it. What did her signature say before? Something about comparing the Twilight series to the bible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 12:43 am
You seem to be taking a comment too personally. It wasn't directed at her at all, I was just speaking my own opinion on it.
I guess it was wrong, but really she was suggesting it to someone who most likely wouldn't be interested in it at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 7:39 am
Jerba She changed her signature. The icon in question is in her profil though. It's way on the side, but still.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 7:20 pm
twilight_is_for_idiots kat__NiSS - - x Jerba She changed her signature. I missed it. What did her signature say before? Something about comparing the Twilight series to the bible. Why would she even bother? I've never read the bible before but I bet it's a hell of a lot better than Twilight. And I like how she adds about how the anti's were whining in her profile. I didn't see any whining. Typical Twitard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 7:45 pm
 stare stare stare gonk gonk gonk scream scream scream mad mad mad talk2hand talk2hand talk2hand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 9:44 pm
_Loyal-Lilly_ stare stare stare gonk gonk gonk scream scream scream mad mad mad talk2hand talk2hand talk2hand And she didn't think people would be offended by this? You'd have to be a ******** nuts Twitard to have that in your sig though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 10:20 pm
As an atheist, I really don't care if a Twitard compares the Twifail series to the bible. They both consist of stories that could never realistically happen but I digres. I suppose it was stupid on her part, seeing as how there's no way she could have put it there without considering the consequences. If she really wants to compare Twifail to a religion, then she should just cut out the middle man and "convert" to their Cullenism bs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 10:49 pm
Ugh... Just my luck to go to another atheist site right before visiting. Did you know that the Bible is far more sexist than Twilight? Still, Twilight is pretty bad. People actually read it... and LIKE it. And take it seriously. The Bible? It's been reworded and twisted so much it doesn't make sense anymore. So anyway, I guess the Bible in some ways can be just as damaging if not more than Twilight. So would I say they're comparable? In some degree, yes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 11:22 pm
Jerba Ugh... Just my luck to go to another atheist site right before visiting. Did you know that the Bible is far more sexist than Twilight? Still, Twilight is pretty bad. People actually read it... and LIKE it. And take it seriously. The Bible? It's been reworded and twisted so much it doesn't make sense anymore. So anyway, I guess the Bible in some ways can be just as damaging if not more than Twilight. So would I say they're comparable? In some degree, yes. I find that offensive as well.. as bad as it is to try to bring Twilight up to the Bible's level, its worse to bring the Bible down to Twilight's level. D: A person who has been raised in a Christian environment like myself would be highly offended by that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
