|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:55 pm
Tiger of the Fire Ipoleta_Esperanza This is disgusting, even for the "pro-choicers'. Next they'll be thinking, "Hey, my kid has the flu, lets kill them!" This is just sad. There are contires that already do somethign similer. I beilive norway. If you are below 12 years old, and are severly ill, your parents or a doctor have the power to euthinize you. That is so horribly wrong. For one thing, many do get better and two- what if they want to live? What happened to choice? Everyone but the child (and father at times) get a say in their life and that child is born. Soon alot of populations will be destoryed cause of selfishness.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:05 am
ryokomayuka They did something similar in Sparta Greece and over time they practical destory their population. yep, they used to take any child, especially male, that they didn't see as "perfect" to a mountain and left them to die You'd THINK we would be more civilized thousands of years later stare
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:14 am
Lady_Amalthea ryokomayuka They did something similar in Sparta Greece and over time they practical destory their population. yep, they used to take any child, especially male, that they didn't see as "perfect" to a mountain and left them to die You'd THINK we would be more civilized thousands of years later stare As i said, man is a predictable creature of habit. History will always repeatiself...even if we learn from it. We learn form it, but tyr and tell out selves "sure...its the same thing on a basic level, but what we're doing is far more regulated, is being done for science, and will even help people" Its funny though. Our programs are really no more scientific, no more regulated and monitered, and no more helping people then what the spartan, germans, and many other civilisations have done in the past and will do in the future. We can learn form history, but th eonly way it will stop repeating itself is when we stop fooling our selves into thinking we can do the same thing but do better.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 9:37 am
I like the one comment on the page "Who didn't see this coming?"
I'm so worried for the future. I know that this was an article in the UK, but I could just as easy see it happening here in the states.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 5:01 am
The church of england allows preemies to be killed.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:09 pm
kasumi_ocada I like the one comment on the page "Who didn't see this coming?" I'm so worried for the future. I know that this was an article in the UK, but I could just as easy see it happening here in the states. I don't think it should matter where it's happening because if a child gets killed across the Atlantic it's the same as if they get killed here cry
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:24 pm
ryokomayuka The church of england allows preemies to be killed. The Anglican church condones abortion?! Now I know why Søren Kierkegaard had such a contempt of churches and their becoming secular based, and he said that over 100 years ago! You can not teach the Bible mixed with your opinions; the Bible says a life begins in the womb and that murder is wrong, therefore, the church has no right to twist the Bible to suit the secular so they can stay "in business" talk2hand
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:31 am
Tiger of the Fire Fushigi na Butterfly WTF??? I thought choosing the sex of your baby was going too far. Now we'll just kill them off if they aren't the way we like them. -.- We'll just keep pushing it a step further and a step further. Next it'll be "let's wait until they're five years old and if we don't like the way they are by then, let's kill them" and soon there'll be mass murders in the name of "sameness." Why is the real world turning more into a science fiction novel everyday?? Because human nature is predicatable. Name any evil or whatis no precieved as an evil and I can guarantee, given enough time, it will be either legal or recognized as just another part of life. Well yeah, what do you think the point of the neo-left's post-mod deconstructionism and absolute relativism is.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:33 am
James_xeno Tiger of the Fire Fushigi na Butterfly WTF??? I thought choosing the sex of your baby was going too far. Now we'll just kill them off if they aren't the way we like them. -.- We'll just keep pushing it a step further and a step further. Next it'll be "let's wait until they're five years old and if we don't like the way they are by then, let's kill them" and soon there'll be mass murders in the name of "sameness." Why is the real world turning more into a science fiction novel everyday?? Because human nature is predicatable. Name any evil or whatis no precieved as an evil and I can guarantee, given enough time, it will be either legal or recognized as just another part of life. Well yeah, what do you think the point of the neo-left's post-mod deconstructionism and absolute relativism is. I did my last english midterm on those two ideas and how they may be affecting our children and people in general.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:11 pm
is it just me or is this strongly reminiscent of Nazi Germany?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:56 pm
i like burnination is it just me or is this strongly reminiscent of Nazi Germany? History will repeat it's self so long as man is fool enough to think he can do the same things, claiming it's diffrent
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:53 pm
i like burnination is it just me or is this strongly reminiscent of Nazi Germany? It's not just you. That is what it seems like. I think it's the same thing they done.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 2:14 pm
Tiger of the Fire I am tempted to say that God is on His way out of the picutre and we're on our way into the Tribulation... At one time it was said we would never see abortion at the level we do today. They were wrong. It is said we would never see somthign liek this. I guarantee as long as people think about it, people will fight for it. "Don't liek euthinasia, don't do it." Sadly, when things liek this are thought about, the idea of a doctor mackign the desicion (not the family) is looked at as well. Bring on the Trials and Tribulation... woo hoo
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 3:31 am
Broorel So a few weeks ago we talked about how born alive infants would not be issued birth certificates if the RCOBG got it's way. Well, now they want to take it a step further and "euthenize" children based on disablility and "other factors for babies, such as being wanted by their parents or other carers and having the potential to make some, even if small, contribution to wider society" Yep, you read that correctly. We have finally moved into the rhelm of post-birth abortion. The argument that abortion is for bodily integrity issues has flown straight out the window, and we are left with blatant infanticide. May God have mercy on our souls. Quote: http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23373401-details/We+must+debate+mercy+killing+of+disabled+babies,+say+top+doctors/article.do First off, the thing about not issuing birth certificates was a suggestion. Don't get your knickers in such a twist. Second, the euthanisation of disabled babies thing is a 'call for debate'. The group of doctors wants to discuss it. These are serious issues, but please, hold the dramatics? I'm not sure how I stand on euthanising disabled babies. I think that if they know for sure that the child is going to die, and die in pain, euthanisation should be an option. There's always the problem of doctors getting it wrong though. Hell, when I was born, they thought I'd be blind, unable to walk, with learning difficulties, and not live very long. All I am now is partially sighted. I suppose I know all too well that doctors can get it wrong. So that's why I'm not entirely sure.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 9:00 am
Quote: The college also raised the question of "whether there should be other factors for babies, such as being wanted by their parents or other carers and having the potential to make some, even if small, contribution to wider society". That is what disturbs me. The very thought that they want to decide who lives and who dies based on things like that makes me ill. It's not that I think it'll happen, it's that there are people out there who want it, and I'm afraid of them gaining a following. It's social engineering, and it's disgusting. "You get to live because WE think you can do some good. But you don't because WE think you won't be worth much. You're not as valuable as the other guy." I'm sorry. Killing people in order to achieve your agenda isn't something that should even be discussed in a sane world.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|