|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 12:58 am
Anara_xx JACKAL! JACKAL! JACKAL!? IT'S A JACKAL! JACKAL! JACKAL! <3
It wasn't right the first time, so why the hell would it be right the next hundred times?! O:<
I don't think they look too bad. Then again, I've never liked the starters much. I literally HATE the one of the bottom right - some sort of fat pig-snorlax-beaver thing? - but I like the idea of a starter with a curly tail, even if it does look like the b*****d child of Cyndaquil and Bayleef.
The one on the right doesn't interest me much. Perhaps some sort of duck? Meh...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 1:23 am
x6LivexFree9x I have a feeling many people are going to be very disappointed when these games come out. I'm already upset with that fact that the pokemon no longer follow you in the game. WHHHHHAAAATTTTTT i declare boycott
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 2:04 am
I actually don't mind the silhouettes. o.o But then, I also don't dislike a majority of the Pokemon already in existence. The only two would be Slaking and then Zoroark.
I'm really disappointed they took the walking feature out. :/ So I'm just going to hold out and hope the Pokemon and plot of the new games will make up for that. >->
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 2:15 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 12:55 pm
I'll pass judgement when I learn more about it...besides, half the starters I don't even like...I transfer over a charizard, breed it and run around with a charmander in pretty much every game.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 9:59 am
Well after finally seeing the new pokemon starters all I have to say is......FAIL =/
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 10:28 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 10:35 am
Sadly I think its safe to say I wont be getting the new games...good job nintendo
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 10:50 am
You shouldn't judge a book, or a pokemon in this case, by it's cover. The starters my look strange but their evolved forms my look pretty cool. I mean look at mudkip to swampert, spoink to grumpig, or gligar to gliscor. Personally I think the generations after Gold got stranger and stranger.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 10:58 am
I'll get the games just to see if its terrible or not. If this new game fails me, that mite be the final pokemon I ever buy. 3nodding But who knows, maybe it'll be good? Maybe the starters are the only lame things in it? xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 11:47 am
They look... different?
I think I'll be going with the otter looking one.. The one on the bottom right..
Dissmissing the entire game based on the starters is a bit rash. I'm hoping the evolved forms look better.. I mean.. I hate how Turtwig looks.. but Torterra looks pretty cool. Not my kinda pokemon but he doesn't make me rage.
I hope there are more evolutions of older pokemon :3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 11:52 am
I'll definitely buy the game - the starter pokemon is just the tip of the iceberg, guys. It could be incredible. Besides, I always tend to get attached to another pokemon anyway =3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 11:56 am
If anything I hope the grass thing at least has a dragon evolution or something...idk maybe they'll grow on me or something
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:03 pm
That snowman/penguin makes me giggle everytime. xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 12:04 pm
They look horrible... they are really round haha
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|