|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 4:36 pm
My side on this matter: "Blah Blah Blah. Just blow up already! GOSH!"
So as you can see...
1. I accept evolution being that all religions say God is all powerful and works in mysterious ways.
2. I really don't care much and neither should you. XD
and 3. Religion is already integrated into our government: Our Pledge of Allegiance. Our Currency. Our country pride phrases. Hell, even our Constitution has religion in it.
So truly, It's too late to actually give a damn about anything anymore.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 4:58 pm
God Emperor Akhenaton I have a theory that evolution is constantly descriminated against in order for the religious right to integrate itself into the US government.
Only difference is that Evolution is dressed up with fancy science.
Imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 6:22 pm
evolution holds more evidence than religion
1. humans are 96 percent monkey fact
2 humans and chimpanzees can and have been able to mate and create offspring
3 in the womb EVERY human grows and sheds a monkeys tail
4 there are some humans that are still born with their tails
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:19 am
fatalblues crimson fang evolution holds more evidence than religion 1. humans are 96 percent monkey fact 2 humans and chimpanzees can and have been able to mate and create offspring 3 in the womb EVERY human grows and sheds a monkeys tail 4 there are some humans that are still born with their tails sigh... 1) that 4% or w/e that separates us from monkeys is huge when your talking about DNA. We are a really high % like dogs too. 2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanzee "no specimen has ever been confirmed" well duh, I doubt a humanzee is even possible or we'd have seen one by now, as they've been trying with no success. 3) the tail is our tailbone, and it is not shed, we just grow into it. we also don't have gills or a egg yolk sack. http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/cfol/ch1-development.asp 4) yea we're absolutely full of genetic mutations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 10:16 am
God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf Even though I am a very religious person, I openly accept the idea of evolution. God said that he created the world in 6 days, but it could be that it was in his time 6 days, but certainly not in our time 6 days. 3nodding Hmmm, but it is pretty much right. Fruiting trees did come after the arrival of land animals, WAAAAAY after. Like, 20 million years ago after. It is funny how it mentioned monsters. You can only think 'dinosaurs'. Dude, give it a rest. The bible is full of stories, stories that teach us how to be better human beings. You don't have to be a Christian to read the bible and maybe take a few lessons from it. It is only the first few sentences of Genesis that gets people to go "This entire thing is BS!", when really there are historical evidence that supports events that have taken place in the past. Then there is Revelations. I believe that we are right in the middle of the Apocalypse, because there are things in the past that support it, particularly within the last century and this one. Whoever had that vision saw all the events at once, but I don't think he could tell how much time it took for all the events to take place. Just food for thought for your Atheism. Oh ya, there is one little problem with stating that your an Atheist. If you are an Atheist, you are denying EVERYTHING supernatural, thus this includes the spirit. Are you saying that there is no such thing as a soul? The Bible has historical accuracy from Abraham to the death of Jesus. Anything after that is unverified. And as it said, light would have came just after the beginning, not on the third day. Sea creatures came before plants as opposed to the bible's claim, Stars came before the earth as opposed to the bible. There are many things wrong with the order. Not to mention that the flood is one big pile of incorrect. Actually if you really think about it there are several legends and myths that tell of a massive flood, not just in Christianity. And if you really think about it in terms of reality, they didn't know the world as we know it today. It could be that they thought it covered the whole world, but actually it may have just covered the world they knew. At that time they didn't know about any other continents, or oceans. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 10:54 am
TrutherMay fatalblues crimson fang evolution holds more evidence than religion 1. humans are 96 percent monkey fact 2 humans and chimpanzees can and have been able to mate and create offspring 3 in the womb EVERY human grows and sheds a monkeys tail 4 there are some humans that are still born with their tails sigh... 1) that 4% or w/e that separates us from monkeys is huge when your talking about DNA. We are a really high % like dogs too. 2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanzee "no specimen has ever been confirmed" well duh, I doubt a humanzee is even possible or we'd have seen one by now, as they've been trying with no success. 3) the tail is our tailbone, and it is not shed, we just grow into it. we also don't have gills or a egg yolk sack. http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/cfol/ch1-development.asp 4) yea we're absolutely full of genetic mutations. aww...I wanted a monkey-human-hybrid as a pet. ...and to go swimming with the fishes in a less "death involved" way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:42 pm
The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf Even though I am a very religious person, I openly accept the idea of evolution. God said that he created the world in 6 days, but it could be that it was in his time 6 days, but certainly not in our time 6 days. 3nodding Hmmm, but it is pretty much right. Fruiting trees did come after the arrival of land animals, WAAAAAY after. Like, 20 million years ago after. It is funny how it mentioned monsters. You can only think 'dinosaurs'. Dude, give it a rest. The bible is full of stories, stories that teach us how to be better human beings. You don't have to be a Christian to read the bible and maybe take a few lessons from it. It is only the first few sentences of Genesis that gets people to go "This entire thing is BS!", when really there are historical evidence that supports events that have taken place in the past. Then there is Revelations. I believe that we are right in the middle of the Apocalypse, because there are things in the past that support it, particularly within the last century and this one. Whoever had that vision saw all the events at once, but I don't think he could tell how much time it took for all the events to take place. Just food for thought for your Atheism. Oh ya, there is one little problem with stating that your an Atheist. If you are an Atheist, you are denying EVERYTHING supernatural, thus this includes the spirit. Are you saying that there is no such thing as a soul? The Bible has historical accuracy from Abraham to the death of Jesus. Anything after that is unverified. And as it said, light would have came just after the beginning, not on the third day. Sea creatures came before plants as opposed to the bible's claim, Stars came before the earth as opposed to the bible. There are many things wrong with the order. Not to mention that the flood is one big pile of incorrect. Actually if you really think about it there are several legends and myths that tell of a massive flood, not just in Christianity. And if you really think about it in terms of reality, they didn't know the world as we know it today. It could be that they thought it covered the whole world, but actually it may have just covered the world they knew. At that time they didn't know about any other continents, or oceans. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:25 pm
God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf Even though I am a very religious person, I openly accept the idea of evolution. God said that he created the world in 6 days, but it could be that it was in his time 6 days, but certainly not in our time 6 days. 3nodding Hmmm, but it is pretty much right. Fruiting trees did come after the arrival of land animals, WAAAAAY after. Like, 20 million years ago after. It is funny how it mentioned monsters. You can only think 'dinosaurs'. Dude, give it a rest. The bible is full of stories, stories that teach us how to be better human beings. You don't have to be a Christian to read the bible and maybe take a few lessons from it. It is only the first few sentences of Genesis that gets people to go "This entire thing is BS!", when really there are historical evidence that supports events that have taken place in the past. Then there is Revelations. I believe that we are right in the middle of the Apocalypse, because there are things in the past that support it, particularly within the last century and this one. Whoever had that vision saw all the events at once, but I don't think he could tell how much time it took for all the events to take place. Just food for thought for your Atheism. Oh ya, there is one little problem with stating that your an Atheist. If you are an Atheist, you are denying EVERYTHING supernatural, thus this includes the spirit. Are you saying that there is no such thing as a soul? The Bible has historical accuracy from Abraham to the death of Jesus. Anything after that is unverified. And as it said, light would have came just after the beginning, not on the third day. Sea creatures came before plants as opposed to the bible's claim, Stars came before the earth as opposed to the bible. There are many things wrong with the order. Not to mention that the flood is one big pile of incorrect. Actually if you really think about it there are several legends and myths that tell of a massive flood, not just in Christianity. And if you really think about it in terms of reality, they didn't know the world as we know it today. It could be that they thought it covered the whole world, but actually it may have just covered the world they knew. At that time they didn't know about any other continents, or oceans. xd How about you actually provide your own evidence instead of posting just links. Hm?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 4:52 pm
The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf Hmmm, but it is pretty much right. Fruiting trees did come after the arrival of land animals, WAAAAAY after. Like, 20 million years ago after. It is funny how it mentioned monsters. You can only think 'dinosaurs'. Dude, give it a rest. The bible is full of stories, stories that teach us how to be better human beings. You don't have to be a Christian to read the bible and maybe take a few lessons from it. It is only the first few sentences of Genesis that gets people to go "This entire thing is BS!", when really there are historical evidence that supports events that have taken place in the past. Then there is Revelations. I believe that we are right in the middle of the Apocalypse, because there are things in the past that support it, particularly within the last century and this one. Whoever had that vision saw all the events at once, but I don't think he could tell how much time it took for all the events to take place. Just food for thought for your Atheism. Oh ya, there is one little problem with stating that your an Atheist. If you are an Atheist, you are denying EVERYTHING supernatural, thus this includes the spirit. Are you saying that there is no such thing as a soul? The Bible has historical accuracy from Abraham to the death of Jesus. Anything after that is unverified. And as it said, light would have came just after the beginning, not on the third day. Sea creatures came before plants as opposed to the bible's claim, Stars came before the earth as opposed to the bible. There are many things wrong with the order. Not to mention that the flood is one big pile of incorrect. Actually if you really think about it there are several legends and myths that tell of a massive flood, not just in Christianity. And if you really think about it in terms of reality, they didn't know the world as we know it today. It could be that they thought it covered the whole world, but actually it may have just covered the world they knew. At that time they didn't know about any other continents, or oceans. xd How about you actually provide your own evidence instead of posting just links. Hm? That site is the most trusted site on the internet. But beside the point, I'll play your game. Let me educate you about flood stories. Flood stories can only be told today because they were recorded and written down. This means that they came from a decent population. Writing serves little to no use for societies with a small population since words don't travel far. In order for a population to be steady, they have to have farms and since they were written down, that means that they were in a city with large amounts of people which means that the farms either were near a big body of water like a river or a lake or in a place where high precipitation occurs. That means that floods are very likely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:48 pm
God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf Hmmm, but it is pretty much right. Fruiting trees did come after the arrival of land animals, WAAAAAY after. Like, 20 million years ago after. It is funny how it mentioned monsters. You can only think 'dinosaurs'. Dude, give it a rest. The bible is full of stories, stories that teach us how to be better human beings. You don't have to be a Christian to read the bible and maybe take a few lessons from it. It is only the first few sentences of Genesis that gets people to go "This entire thing is BS!", when really there are historical evidence that supports events that have taken place in the past. Then there is Revelations. I believe that we are right in the middle of the Apocalypse, because there are things in the past that support it, particularly within the last century and this one. Whoever had that vision saw all the events at once, but I don't think he could tell how much time it took for all the events to take place. Just food for thought for your Atheism. Oh ya, there is one little problem with stating that your an Atheist. If you are an Atheist, you are denying EVERYTHING supernatural, thus this includes the spirit. Are you saying that there is no such thing as a soul? The Bible has historical accuracy from Abraham to the death of Jesus. Anything after that is unverified. And as it said, light would have came just after the beginning, not on the third day. Sea creatures came before plants as opposed to the bible's claim, Stars came before the earth as opposed to the bible. There are many things wrong with the order. Not to mention that the flood is one big pile of incorrect. Actually if you really think about it there are several legends and myths that tell of a massive flood, not just in Christianity. And if you really think about it in terms of reality, they didn't know the world as we know it today. It could be that they thought it covered the whole world, but actually it may have just covered the world they knew. At that time they didn't know about any other continents, or oceans. xd How about you actually provide your own evidence instead of posting just links. Hm? That site is the most trusted site on the internet. But beside the point, I'll play your game. Let me educate you about flood stories. Flood stories can only be told today because they were recorded and written down. This means that they came from a decent population. Writing serves little to no use for societies with a small population since words don't travel far. In order for a population to be steady, they have to have farms and since they were written down, that means that they were in a city with large amounts of people which means that the farms either were near a big body of water like a river or a lake or in a place where high precipitation occurs. That means that floods are very likely. So what exactly is your point that your trying to get across? Yes it is known that large populations live near water. Yes it is known that floods were likely. Yes, it is known that missionaries could possibly influence myths. Yes, it is known that if people did not write down their myths, they didn't get as far because they were orally told. But what is your point in all of this? What exactly are you trying to prove? You've got the facts, now form the statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 7:12 pm
The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf Actually if you really think about it there are several legends and myths that tell of a massive flood, not just in Christianity. And if you really think about it in terms of reality, they didn't know the world as we know it today. It could be that they thought it covered the whole world, but actually it may have just covered the world they knew. At that time they didn't know about any other continents, or oceans. xd How about you actually provide your own evidence instead of posting just links. Hm? That site is the most trusted site on the internet. But beside the point, I'll play your game. Let me educate you about flood stories. Flood stories can only be told today because they were recorded and written down. This means that they came from a decent population. Writing serves little to no use for societies with a small population since words don't travel far. In order for a population to be steady, they have to have farms and since they were written down, that means that they were in a city with large amounts of people which means that the farms either were near a big body of water like a river or a lake or in a place where high precipitation occurs. That means that floods are very likely. So what exactly is your point that your trying to get across? Yes it is known that large populations live near water. Yes it is known that floods were likely. Yes, it is known that missionaries could possibly influence myths. Yes, it is known that if people did not write down their myths, they didn't get as far because they were orally told. But what is your point in all of this? What exactly are you trying to prove? You've got the facts, now form the statement. My point is that just because other societies have flood stories, does not mean they stem from the same great flood mentioned by the Hebrews (Who took it from the Mesopotamians anyway)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:48 pm
God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf Actually if you really think about it there are several legends and myths that tell of a massive flood, not just in Christianity. And if you really think about it in terms of reality, they didn't know the world as we know it today. It could be that they thought it covered the whole world, but actually it may have just covered the world they knew. At that time they didn't know about any other continents, or oceans. xd How about you actually provide your own evidence instead of posting just links. Hm? That site is the most trusted site on the internet. But beside the point, I'll play your game. Let me educate you about flood stories. Flood stories can only be told today because they were recorded and written down. This means that they came from a decent population. Writing serves little to no use for societies with a small population since words don't travel far. In order for a population to be steady, they have to have farms and since they were written down, that means that they were in a city with large amounts of people which means that the farms either were near a big body of water like a river or a lake or in a place where high precipitation occurs. That means that floods are very likely. So what exactly is your point that your trying to get across? Yes it is known that large populations live near water. Yes it is known that floods were likely. Yes, it is known that missionaries could possibly influence myths. Yes, it is known that if people did not write down their myths, they didn't get as far because they were orally told. But what is your point in all of this? What exactly are you trying to prove? You've got the facts, now form the statement. My point is that just because other societies have flood stories, does not mean they stem from the same great flood mentioned by the Hebrews (Who took it from the Mesopotamians anyway) Finally! You state your point! And it has a strong backing too. Now, let us see who else wants to put their input on this matter, then we can agree on common things concerning ancient floods, and possibly form a theory. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 10:00 pm
The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf How about you actually provide your own evidence instead of posting just links. Hm? That site is the most trusted site on the internet. But beside the point, I'll play your game. Let me educate you about flood stories. Flood stories can only be told today because they were recorded and written down. This means that they came from a decent population. Writing serves little to no use for societies with a small population since words don't travel far. In order for a population to be steady, they have to have farms and since they were written down, that means that they were in a city with large amounts of people which means that the farms either were near a big body of water like a river or a lake or in a place where high precipitation occurs. That means that floods are very likely. So what exactly is your point that your trying to get across? Yes it is known that large populations live near water. Yes it is known that floods were likely. Yes, it is known that missionaries could possibly influence myths. Yes, it is known that if people did not write down their myths, they didn't get as far because they were orally told. But what is your point in all of this? What exactly are you trying to prove? You've got the facts, now form the statement. My point is that just because other societies have flood stories, does not mean they stem from the same great flood mentioned by the Hebrews (Who took it from the Mesopotamians anyway) Finally! You state your point! And it has a strong backing too. Now, let us see who else wants to put their input on this matter, then we can agree on common things concerning ancient floods, and possibly form a theory. 3nodding I stated it long ago, you just didn't listen!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 12:21 am
God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf How about you actually provide your own evidence instead of posting just links. Hm? That site is the most trusted site on the internet. But beside the point, I'll play your game. Let me educate you about flood stories. Flood stories can only be told today because they were recorded and written down. This means that they came from a decent population. Writing serves little to no use for societies with a small population since words don't travel far. In order for a population to be steady, they have to have farms and since they were written down, that means that they were in a city with large amounts of people which means that the farms either were near a big body of water like a river or a lake or in a place where high precipitation occurs. That means that floods are very likely. So what exactly is your point that your trying to get across? Yes it is known that large populations live near water. Yes it is known that floods were likely. Yes, it is known that missionaries could possibly influence myths. Yes, it is known that if people did not write down their myths, they didn't get as far because they were orally told. But what is your point in all of this? What exactly are you trying to prove? You've got the facts, now form the statement. My point is that just because other societies have flood stories, does not mean they stem from the same great flood mentioned by the Hebrews (Who took it from the Mesopotamians anyway) Finally! You state your point! And it has a strong backing too. Now, let us see who else wants to put their input on this matter, then we can agree on common things concerning ancient floods, and possibly form a theory. 3nodding I stated it long ago, you just didn't listen! Blame me for my infatuation with the song "You Spin Me Right 'Round." xp Joking, blame the government for screwing up my head with vaccines at a very early age. I still haven't fully got rid of my Autism. -_-''
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2010 3:02 pm
The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf God Emperor Akhenaton The White Gale Dragonwolf So what exactly is your point that your trying to get across? Yes it is known that large populations live near water. Yes it is known that floods were likely. Yes, it is known that missionaries could possibly influence myths. Yes, it is known that if people did not write down their myths, they didn't get as far because they were orally told. But what is your point in all of this? What exactly are you trying to prove? You've got the facts, now form the statement. My point is that just because other societies have flood stories, does not mean they stem from the same great flood mentioned by the Hebrews (Who took it from the Mesopotamians anyway) Finally! You state your point! And it has a strong backing too. Now, let us see who else wants to put their input on this matter, then we can agree on common things concerning ancient floods, and possibly form a theory. 3nodding I stated it long ago, you just didn't listen! Blame me for my infatuation with the song "You Spin Me Right 'Round." xp Joking, blame the government for screwing up my head with vaccines at a very early age. I still haven't fully got rid of my Autism. -_-'' You can't get rid of Autism. You will have it until you die.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
