|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 4:40 am
Have you ever thought that the heads of the Islamic terrorist organizations could be working with the US government and secret service?
Think of this, US the head of the world, the tower of power who could trample anyone in their path cannot find a couple of people who live on mountains? They did, however, find Sadam Hussein who was planted in a well hidden well in the most remote place anyone can ever think of.
Doesn't that sound a bit tad illogical and irrational even amusing to some extent?
The US is able to find a person when they want to, they just don't let us know that. Conclusion: Osama Bin Laden is secretly working with the US.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 4:26 pm
Yep of course he was working for the US. I believe he is already dead (Egypt reported his funeral), and has been dead for years. Yet they wont let the people know that because they still need a boogie man.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 4:39 pm
I believe they were funded by the US. That was documented. But I believe that Islam is a religion with too many extremists. Whether Bin Laden is dead is unknown to me. It's possible though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 1:51 am
Maybe he is dead but yes, the boogieman has to live so that the nation be under an iron fist without even knowing it. If you ever have doubts about Bin Laden working for the US government, just think of this and repeat it 10 times: "Bin Laden was once a C.I.A. agent". As much of a shock that may come (or not) that is the truth, he once DID work for the US, question is, what guarantees us that he still isn't working for them?
P.S. Islam is being perverted for personal reasons by people. If you are a Muslim you will know that killing is forbidden, especially innocent civilians. I know this for I too was born and raised a Muslim before I turned to atheism that is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 4:26 pm
The media has done a great job at convincing the sheep that Islam is a horrible religion all about terror and killing. Yet it's the fastest growing religion on earth! What the sheep don't understand is that it's NOT about killing at all, that's a total misconception by the uneducated and brainwashed. Based on the Quran verses, it is unlawful to murder anyone who is innocent of any crime. That being said, it is possible that some people pervert the interpretations of the Quran and brainwash others to do killing. But a LOT of the labels of "Jihads" we give the Islamic murders is unjust and incorrect. These people do such acts NOT because of the Quran (they are not trying to be martyrs!), but because of life issues. They are an occupied and demoralized people, they lose their homes and family etc. They do such acts out of desperation and as REVENGE. I think it would be safe to say most of the suicide bombers DON'T believe in the Quran full heartily, or they wouldn't do such a thing because suicide is haram (prohibited) and would send them straight to HELL!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 6:48 pm
TrutherMay The media has done a great job at convincing the sheep that Islam is a horrible religion all about terror and killing. Yet it's the fastest growing religion on earth! What the sheep don't understand is that it's NOT about killing at all, that's a total misconception by the uneducated and brainwashed. Based on the Quran verses, it is unlawful to murder anyone who is innocent of any crime. That being said, it is possible that some people pervert the interpretations of the Quran and brainwash others to do killing. But a LOT of the labels of "Jihads" we give the Islamic murders is unjust and incorrect. These people do such acts NOT because of the Quran (they are not trying to be martyrs!), but because of life issues. They are an occupied and demoralized people, they lose their homes and family etc. They do such acts out of desperation and as REVENGE. I think it would be safe to say most of the suicide bombers DON'T believe in the Quran full heartily, or they wouldn't do such a thing because suicide is haram (prohibited) and would send them straight to HELL! Most of those people only know what the imam tells them. It doesn't matter whether Islam is a violent religion or not; the violence comes from people identifying as Muslim. Christianity isn't a violent religion either, on paper, but all we have to do is look back at history to see that it doesn't always work out that way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 1:05 am
Obscurus TrutherMay The media has done a great job at convincing the sheep that Islam is a horrible religion all about terror and killing. Yet it's the fastest growing religion on earth! What the sheep don't understand is that it's NOT about killing at all, that's a total misconception by the uneducated and brainwashed. Based on the Quran verses, it is unlawful to murder anyone who is innocent of any crime. That being said, it is possible that some people pervert the interpretations of the Quran and brainwash others to do killing. But a LOT of the labels of "Jihads" we give the Islamic murders is unjust and incorrect. These people do such acts NOT because of the Quran (they are not trying to be martyrs!), but because of life issues. They are an occupied and demoralized people, they lose their homes and family etc. They do such acts out of desperation and as REVENGE. I think it would be safe to say most of the suicide bombers DON'T believe in the Quran full heartily, or they wouldn't do such a thing because suicide is haram (prohibited) and would send them straight to HELL! Most of those people only know what the imam tells them. It doesn't matter whether Islam is a violent religion or not; the violence comes from people identifying as Muslim. Christianity isn't a violent religion either, on paper, but all we have to do is look back at history to see that it doesn't always work out that way. Or they could be people payed by the government or The Masons, or the Knight Templars to give Islam a bad reputation?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 10:09 pm
Fiddle Playing Johnny Obscurus TrutherMay The media has done a great job at convincing the sheep that Islam is a horrible religion all about terror and killing. Yet it's the fastest growing religion on earth! What the sheep don't understand is that it's NOT about killing at all, that's a total misconception by the uneducated and brainwashed. Based on the Quran verses, it is unlawful to murder anyone who is innocent of any crime. That being said, it is possible that some people pervert the interpretations of the Quran and brainwash others to do killing. But a LOT of the labels of "Jihads" we give the Islamic murders is unjust and incorrect. These people do such acts NOT because of the Quran (they are not trying to be martyrs!), but because of life issues. They are an occupied and demoralized people, they lose their homes and family etc. They do such acts out of desperation and as REVENGE. I think it would be safe to say most of the suicide bombers DON'T believe in the Quran full heartily, or they wouldn't do such a thing because suicide is haram (prohibited) and would send them straight to HELL! Most of those people only know what the imam tells them. It doesn't matter whether Islam is a violent religion or not; the violence comes from people identifying as Muslim. Christianity isn't a violent religion either, on paper, but all we have to do is look back at history to see that it doesn't always work out that way. Or they could be people payed by the government or The Masons, or the Knight Templars to give Islam a bad reputation? I guess that's possible too. I think it's more likely the crusade mentality though. Doesn't mean those people aren't pawns themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 12:37 pm
All I can say about Terrorism is that it does NOT exist. When a small army goes against a larger army, the smaller army uses a tactic known as Geurilla Warfare. Thats all it really is. There isn't even a definition for terrorism that is agreed upon by the United Nations, and at the current rate, a Terrorist will be anyone aposed to the US.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 9:14 pm
Mordeckai All I can say about Terrorism is that it does NOT exist. When a small army goes against a larger army, the smaller army uses a tactic known as Geurilla Warfare. Thats all it really is. There isn't even a definition for terrorism that is agreed upon by the United Nations, and at the current rate, a Terrorist will be anyone aposed to the US. Killing non-combatants with the intent to cause fear is terrorism. The workers in the WTC were not an army. I'm not going to get into the quagmire of what actually happened that day, but everyone can agree that a lot of people died that day and none of them were waving guns, invading the Middle East. In short, terrorism does exist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 12:02 pm
Obscurus Mordeckai All I can say about Terrorism is that it does NOT exist. When a small army goes against a larger army, the smaller army uses a tactic known as Geurilla Warfare. Thats all it really is. There isn't even a definition for terrorism that is agreed upon by the United Nations, and at the current rate, a Terrorist will be anyone aposed to the US. Killing non-combatants with the intent to cause fear is terrorism. The workers in the WTC were not an army. I'm not going to get into the quagmire of what actually happened that day, but everyone can agree that a lot of people died that day and none of them were waving guns, invading the Middle East. In short, terrorism does exist. Find me the official definition of terrorism then, and not the american webster's definition, but the United Nations definition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 9:53 pm
Mordeckai Obscurus Mordeckai All I can say about Terrorism is that it does NOT exist. When a small army goes against a larger army, the smaller army uses a tactic known as Geurilla Warfare. Thats all it really is. There isn't even a definition for terrorism that is agreed upon by the United Nations, and at the current rate, a Terrorist will be anyone aposed to the US. Killing non-combatants with the intent to cause fear is terrorism. The workers in the WTC were not an army. I'm not going to get into the quagmire of what actually happened that day, but everyone can agree that a lot of people died that day and none of them were waving guns, invading the Middle East. In short, terrorism does exist. Find me the official definition of terrorism then, and not the american webster's definition, but the United Nations definition. Just because the United Nations doesn't define what it is (it makes it easy for them to demonize people that way) doesn't mean that terroristic acts, and hence terrorism, doesn't exist. In our legal system, the act of threatening harm to someone is called "terroristic threatening". What is it when you perform an act to intentionally instill fear in a person or population? A small scale might be stuffing a severed dog's head in a mailbox. A large scale would be a suicide bomber. I understand what you're getting at, that "terrorism" is an arbitrary term that can be applied when they want to turn opinion against someone and loosen some of the restrictions on doing certain things. Just because the United Nations doesn't seem to be interested in defining what terrorism is doesn't mean that terroristic acts (acts designed to instill terror) do not exist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 12:04 pm
All I'm trying to say is that if there is terrorism, then not only is the United States a terrorist country (Remember Hiroshima and Nakasaki?), but everyone is a terrorist, since everyone has caused fear or threatened someone before (all except Kayla).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 4:11 pm
Shuyajin Tourniquet Static I couldn't even watch through that bullshit. 'Expand the criteria for terrorists' Ya, your one of them guy! Freakin' news reporting terrorizor! Permision to lol? lol Its my opinion that you don't need to strap on a bomb and blow yourself up to terrorize the s**t out of people. True but it's effective. The fact that someone is willing to die just to kill another is quite terrifying. How are you suppose to threaten that? Let alone stop it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 10:28 pm
Mordeckai All I'm trying to say is that if there is terrorism, then not only is the United States a terrorist country (Remember Hiroshima and Nakasaki?), but everyone is a terrorist, since everyone has caused fear or threatened someone before (all except Kayla). The use of fear to get what you want is essentially terrorism, even if fear is all that you want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
