|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 1:43 am
did you know NASA does NOT have to answer to the US government? it can do w/e the hell it wants without telling them or asking them.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 2:38 am
You do know nasa is run by the goverment.
And the technology they have will probably be used for the so called '2012 ufo attack false flag' ....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 4:31 am
well yea, hense nasa.gov lol. ok i take back what i said. i heard in some video that nasa could legally refuse to surrender information to the president, but i can't verify it and all search results are coming back completely opposite of that.
yea, they could very easily go forth with project blue beam and put on a holographic display for all to see and use voice to skull technology to convince us of a fake alien invasion or Jesus Christ's second coming.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 8:49 pm
NASA is still a civilian space agency. The military most likely has it's own space program that we don't know about. Our public human space flight program has been killed, but I very much doubt the shuttle missions will be the end of human space flight for the US.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 11:55 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 1:09 pm
Saltwater fuel: Allegedly, a certain type of radio wave causes salt water to burn. But how much energy does it take to produce said wave? If you're using five AA batteries to create the energy of four AA batteries (just an example,) you are not gaining the energy of four AA batteries. Quote: Curious, Kanzius and colleagues decided to ignite the water with a match. The water lit and kept burning as long as it remained in the radio frequency field. Meaning that you have to keep the radio frequency field going or else the flame goes kaput. Essentially, this is just another method of separating Hydrogen from water.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 9:09 pm
Sciamancer Saltwater fuel: Allegedly, a certain type of radio wave causes salt water to burn. But how much energy does it take to produce said wave? If you're using five AA batteries to create the energy of four AA batteries (just an example,) you are not gaining the energy of four AA batteries. Quote: Curious, Kanzius and colleagues decided to ignite the water with a match. The water lit and kept burning as long as it remained in the radio frequency field. Meaning that you have to keep the radio frequency field going or else the flame goes kaput. Essentially, this is just another method of separating Hydrogen from water. In fairness though, no method that we've come up with is as efficient as we'd like. I think the feasibility of this would depend on how much energy is actually required for the radio waves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 8:13 am
Obscurus I think the feasibility of this would depend on how much energy is actually required for the radio waves. ...which is conveniently left out of all of the optimistic articles, heralding seawater-burning as the fuel source that will get us out of the energy crisis... That little bit of information is what we need. We need to see exactly how much energy it takes to make the radiowaves, and exactly how much energy burning the hydrogen in the sea water produces, and how much energy is lost in our energy collection technique. (Ie, how the hell we convert that heat energy into electrical energy or whatever kind of energy we need.) So... P - L - R = G Where P = energy Produced by burning the hydrogen, L = energy Lost in our conversion techniques, R = energy neeeded to produce the Radiowaves, and G = energy Gained. The larger "G" is, the better, but if "G" is a negative number, this source of energy is pretty ********, unless we can lower "L" or "R."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 9:47 pm
Sciamancer Obscurus I think the feasibility of this would depend on how much energy is actually required for the radio waves. ...which is conveniently left out of all of the optimistic articles, heralding seawater-burning as the fuel source that will get us out of the energy crisis... That little bit of information is what we need. We need to see exactly how much energy it takes to make the radiowaves, and exactly how much energy burning the hydrogen in the sea water produces, and how much energy is lost in our energy collection technique. (Ie, how the hell we convert that heat energy into electrical energy or whatever kind of energy we need.) So... P - L - R = G Where P = energy Produced by burning the hydrogen, L = energy Lost in our conversion techniques, R = energy neeeded to produce the Radiowaves, and G = energy Gained. The larger "G" is, the better, but if "G" is a negative number, this source of energy is pretty ********, unless we can lower "L" or "R." Exactly. Which is why, even though I find it interesting to burn seawater, I don't really have much optimism for it replacing petroleum anytime soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:24 pm
Doper Skiller Yeah. Nasa Supposedly has technology 20 years ahead of this time.. NASA, doesn't. Oh no, no, no. IF THEY DID, everyone would. Its the operations behind the operations that have tech (far) beyond the public mainstream. NASA is like the president, the front man, to the secret America. Your giving too much power to beliefs if you think they use such a loose end like NASA(to incorporate advanced tech).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:30 pm
TrutherMei Almost Poetic "Voice-to-Skull Technology"?
Damnit, May. >.> Now we have to make tinfoil hats. haha~ you might be right lol. Have you ever felt depressed randomly? Attacking yourself mentally? Or just have voices that won't shut up? Then try a tin foil hat! You'd be surprised the comfort, even the idea of wearing one, it provides. That is until somebody sees you.. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:32 pm
Obscurus For anyone looking for more information on psychotronic devices, I would suggest a book called Mind Machines You Can Build by G. Harry Stine. It's out of print and, the last I saw, a used copy was $40. That said, I know for a fact it can be acquired online in digital form for no cost if your Google-fu is strong enough. This book shows you amazing mind machines that you can build; everything from "pyramid power" devices to the Hieronymous machine and "wishing" machine. The best part is that they're all relatively cheap to make and test for yourself. ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 9:23 pm
Shuyajin Obscurus For anyone looking for more information on psychotronic devices, I would suggest a book called Mind Machines You Can Build by G. Harry Stine. It's out of print and, the last I saw, a used copy was $40. That said, I know for a fact it can be acquired online in digital form for no cost if your Google-fu is strong enough. This book shows you amazing mind machines that you can build; everything from "pyramid power" devices to the Hieronymous machine and "wishing" machine. The best part is that they're all relatively cheap to make and test for yourself. ? There's not really much connection between the book I mentioned and the devices on that website. The book talks about things like the Hieronymous machine and energy wheels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:06 pm
Quickly. We must retaliate before they start to read our thoughts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 10:04 am
Rolan Gray Quickly. We must retaliate before they start to read our thoughts. Knowing our society, they're probably just going to use the info they get from our thoughts for targeted advertising.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
