|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:20 pm
goddess_oraorchid I focus on the TV timeline but with the books and such I see some of them as part of the same timeline other's are time divergences, other reality's where something diverged from the main Doctor Who universe timeline Now history's mutable and up-for-grabs that's probably how we should consider almost everything we saw pre-Time War. wink
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 6:40 am
Okay, so my list is a lot more simple since I haven't seen many of the little things like annuals and so on so I'll leave them out. They can be in an alternate annual universe.
IN! The Original TV series.
Obviously - it's the bit I love best!
IN! K9 & Company.
(it's silly but it fits)
OUT! The 'original' Target novels
OUT! The New Adventures novels
OUT! The Missing Adventures novels
OUT! The BBC Eighth Doctor Novels
OUT! The BBC Past Doctor novels
This is probably a pretty insane move... and I know it's really unfair of me since I've only scratched the surface on reading them... but I really have to chuck out the books for my own sanity. There are just too many little things that annoy me and too much reminds me of the worser parts of fanfiction without the fan-based charm, not to mention messing around with the timelines to the point of insanity. NB: There are some really good books out there but I'd rather lose them than gain the bad ones.
IN! Bernice Summerfield's Audio Adventures
IN! The Eighth Doctor telemovie
IN! Iris Wildthyme Audios
IN! Big Finish's Doctor Who Audios
IN! Big Finish's BBC7 Doctor Who radio plays
(even though I don't like the companions I'm letting them in...)
IN! Big Finish's spin-off audios
IN! The Scream of the Shalka.
Ok, bit complicated here but I absolutely love and adore and worship Richard E. Grant's alt. 9th Doctor and I would kill to have him be the 11th Doctor. So purely for selfish reasons I keep him in and view him (depending on the weather) as either an alternative 9th Doctor from a different dimension (one without the Time War(s)) or the future 11th Doctor (if for some bizarre reason the Timelords returned).
OUT! The Curse of Fatal Death
I love it but I don't believe it.
IN! Torchwood
I hate it but it hasn't actually given me a reason to chuck it out yet.
IN! The Sarah-Jane Adventures
IN! The Current TV series.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:28 am
Yay! Someone else is prepared to be as geeky as me. biggrin
Thanks for playing! It feels fun doesn't it, deciding what to keep and what not? Like sorting out an attic.
Interesting too, seeing how differently they turn out depending on your perspective. My 'expanded' Doctor Who universe sort of has the novels as its spine and grafts the audios and comics to it where best they fit, while yours is very Big Finish-centric. smile
Hope some more people chip in with thiers.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:57 pm
Okay then... I haven't read many Doctor Who novels nor listened to any Audio adventures, but I don't think they should be strictly canonical, simply because they're just going to be flatly contradicted in the TV series. In my opinion, the only things that should be canonical should be the original series, the new series, Torchwood and Sarah Jane Adventures (even though I haven't seen any of the last one. I hate living in Australia...)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 3:24 pm
Richard_Swift goddess_oraorchid I focus on the TV timeline but with the books and such I see some of them as part of the same timeline other's are time divergences, other reality's where something diverged from the main Doctor Who universe timeline Now history's mutable and up-for-grabs that's probably how we should consider almost everything we saw pre-Time War. wink lol your probably right but I like to keep things relativly consistant from the first episode to the newest mrgreen
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 3:30 am
Travis III I haven't read many Doctor Who novels nor listened to any Audio adventures, but I don't think they should be strictly canonical, simply because they're just going to be flatly contradicted in the TV series. Well, they (like everything else) can't be considered 'strictly canonical' because Doctor Who has no strict canon. smile So while your opinion is as correct as everyone else's, there's a couple of things I'd say to the logic by which you arrive at it. Yes, the new series has contradicted the novels. Though not as often as it's referenced them.
'Contradiction' doesn't work as a guide to 'what counts' in Doctor Who. Season Two of the classic series contradicts Season One, that doesn't mean it was throwing it out of canon. Season Twenty contradicts the entire UNIT era. Season Fourteen contradicts almost everything that came before it. Nobody ever argues that the classic series was constantly throwing its earlier stories out of canon.
The New Series contradicts the original television series unashamedly from its second episode on. And from its third episode on it spells out that it's now got a good reason to. History gets altered during Time Wars and, with the Time Lords gone then history is now mutable...
The Unquiet Dead "Time's in flux. It's changing every second. Your cozy little world could be rewritten like that" History's changing every second. Just ask the Fourth Bountiful Human Empire if you can find them. So just because something's completely and flatly contradicted doesn't mean it didn't happen. It just means it happened and then unhappened. smile goddess_oraorchid lol your probably right but I like to keep things relativly consistant from the first episode to the newest mrgreen Good luck with that. wink
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 10:52 pm
I have to say that if it isn't the TV series it isn't canon, because the TV series can ignore &/or contradict the novels & audios as they please. This isn't to say I don't sometimes enjoy the novels (& what few audios I've heard), even wish they could be official sometimes, but bottom line, they're just really good fanfic that was lucky enough to get paid. RTD needs to get his act together better though & be more professional, because there's too much of the series that has heavy fanfic overtones now, & it's getting harder & harder for me to even see the show as canon. There can be drawbacks to fans taking full possession of their fandom.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:29 am
Eirwyn I have to say that if it isn't the TV series it isn't canon, because the TV series can ignore &/or contradict the novels & audios as they please. Again, as I rather feel I've shown in the post directly above, that line of arguement doesn't work because the TV series can ignore and/or contradict itself as it pleases. And it does. It always has, and it always will. Logical arguements to show what is and isn't officially canon will always fail, because the official policy is that There Is No Official Canon. The new series has gone even further by, rather wonderfully and rather paradoxically, putting it in canon that there is no canon. twisted There's no right answer. There's no meaningful or logical way of saying, "This is official because..." All you can say is "This is what feels to me like the True History of the Doctor." And if that's just the TV series then fine, popular choice. But that's all it is. A choice. There's no 'bottom line' to be drawn.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 1:39 pm
I hear you--but it IS my choice that only the show is official. It's too big a confusing mess otherwise.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:34 pm
All's good then. smile
It just didn't sound to me like you were stating your personal choice because you were using the word 'official', which means sort of the opposite. Oh, except here on Gaia where it means almost anything. I must try to remember that!
Anyway, now that's cleared up, then I completely agree with you. Including the books, comics and audios does make the Doctor Who universe a big confusing mess. Making it, for my tastes, the perfect habitat for an unknowable trickster god like the Doctor. wink
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:52 pm
Some more thoughts on this sort of thing from Russ in this month's DWM that open up a new angle.
You know how back in Season One of NewWho then the Doctor says Harriet Jones will serve three terms?
And you know how The Christmas Invaision flatly contradicted that* by having her forced out after only one term?
Well, it turns out Russell had been planning for two years that the change the Doctor makes to history with "Don't you think she looks tired?" is what allows the Saxon administration to come into existence.
The scenes that revealed this were to be "a glorious moral victory for the Master, tying up complex events across three seasons, making the whole thing look oh, so bloody planned!"
Problem is, he never wrote them. As of the two episodes in which they could have gone one was already too dark and one was already too exposition heavy.
So the speeches in which it's revealed that the historical domino pushed over before Season Two lead to Season Three's finale never made it on screen.
Which sets Russ to wondering...
"Are those speeches still true? Do they stand? Are they valid? Are they real?"
What do you all think?
* - Presumably making the first season non-canonical for some. twisted
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 5:12 pm
Oh, some of us had been saying that something was up there & that the Doctor had clearly messed up what was supposed to be a really good period of history in a snit at Harriet. For crying out loud, would he be happier having someone with that power who would use it without qualms such as she definately had? She didn't want to shoot down that spacecraft, she did what she saw as being necessary for the safety of Earth. Some politicians in her shoes at that moment wouldn't care a bit to blow away some aliens, and could go right on using that power to abusive lengths. The Doctor was a real idiot for getting rid of Harriet whether you believe it was responsible for the Saxon term or not.
Oh, and I used "official" because that's how I'm used to talking about it. I'm a geezery old school fan in her 40's. This however-you-like-it type continuity just annoys me. I don't even read any of the new novels--I want them to bring back the Classic Series novels, and in paperback! I'm not paying $13 for a Who novel!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:50 pm
Eirwyn I'm a geezery old school fan in her 40's. This however-you-like-it type continuity just annoys me.Geezery old fan in his 30's here, but I'm not sure I can go with your implication that this approach to continuity is anything new. The BBC have never issued a statement on canon. It's not like there used to be one and now it's been taken back. This isn't some crazy new innovation. It's the way it's always been, just made explicit. Why would it annoy you though? What does your Doctor Who loose from having other people's Doctor Whos be equally correct? Eirwyn I don't even read any of the new novels--I want them to bring back the Classic Series novels, and in paperback! I'm not paying $13 for a Who novel! If you're talking about something equivalent to the NAs/MAs/EDAs/PDAs instead of the current kiddy hardbacks then I'm firmly with you on that one. The impression I get from that recent interview with the line's editor though is that we might be getting some good news there soon.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 10:32 am
I don't know--it just feels a lot more random now that nobody's trying to keep any of it straight. If this is supposed to be due to the Time War, I'm quite ready for some of this randomness to ricochet back on the War and cause it NOT to have ever happened. I want Gallifrey and the stuffy, boring, insular Time Lords and a Doctor that is just a carefree wanderer again. This "Last of the Time Lords" & "Lonely Angel" stuff is getting boring.
As to books, I'd be happy if they'd at least print the Short Trips in paperback. Sometimes those have been OK--but getting the Past Doctors Novels back would be even better. Don't they realize the new fans are discovering and enjoying the Classic Series now?
Oh, yeah--something that occured to me last night about Harriet....Suppose she'd still been in office when the Master decided he wanted to ruin the Doctor's favorite planet. Would he really have just said, "oh, fudge, no election!" & gone on his way? More likely he would have caused her to disappear, & then gotten himself elected.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:57 am
Of what I have seen:
OUT! Love and Monsters. What the hell was that.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|