[Gothic_Lolita]
I don't know; I'm not willing to attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by stupidity.
Oh I don't think anyone really thinks it's malice instead of stupidity. The issue is that Hollywood traditionally has a habit of appropriating roles with originally Asian characters and casting them as white.
21 was a recent famous example. Their belief is, as ever, that the viewers just wouldn't be able to identify with non-white non-male leads. I don't think it's because they hate Asians. I think it's because culturally that ethnicity has been relegated to a very specific set of rolls and no executive wants to buck trend in case it doesn't make enough money.
But,
just because it's caused by stupidity instead of malice doesn't mean it's not wrong.The casting calls for the leads in Airbender all called for caucasian actors. There are in reality plenty of non-white actors and I'm willing to bet lots of them are ethnically appropriate to the rolls. Are there are a lot of Inuits in Hollywood? Probably not. Are there people a lot more ethnically close than "white person who we're going to pretend is Inuit?" Hell yes. And having the actor say "well I'll just get a tan and no one will no the difference" is so against the point as to be rendered a farse.
Dev Patel was only cast after
two things happened: the blow up over the racebending issue, and the original actor was going to unable to meet the schedule demands. And
after that all the villains were cast as ethnically Indian, presumably to "match."
Watching the show, it's very clear which cultures are expressed and which real-world-parallels they have. Put it this way: if someone were going to make a movie about Black Panther, a character who looks black, comes from Africa, lives in an African culture and has African traditions up the wazoo....would you cast him with a white actor and say, "well we'll just give him a tan?"